| Revision as of 16:39, 27 September 2009 editDentren (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers37,577 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:44, 27 September 2009 edit undoMarshalN20 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers15,094 edits →Sourcing: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
| ::Bolivia may be perhaps the country where the Daiblada has most signifation for the country as whole, but the claim of exclusivity is just a recent political claim. Any polemical statement of exclusivity, origin, or something simmilar should be removed from that artcile of not properly sourced. This article seems to need permanent watching. ] | ] 16:39, 27 September 2009 (UTC) | ::Bolivia may be perhaps the country where the Daiblada has most signifation for the country as whole, but the claim of exclusivity is just a recent political claim. Any polemical statement of exclusivity, origin, or something simmilar should be removed from that artcile of not properly sourced. This article seems to need permanent watching. ] | ] 16:39, 27 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| == Sourcing == | |||
| I'll try to find more sources about the dance. I don't really care much about it, but I don't agree with the random IP editors who vandalize the page and take advantage of the lack of reliable sources. My position is the same: The Diablada is a dance of Peru, Chile, and Bolivia. It's an important part of these 3 nation, and not one nation can claim exclusivity of this dance. Of course, if any other editor wishes to bring in other sources in order to build up on the article, they can feel free to do so.--] (]) 17:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 17:44, 27 September 2009
Just From One Country?
Recently i have been seeing many changes of this page. Some changes that say that the dance Belongs to Bolivia. If you edit this page then please leave out Patriotism and put in only facts.
Not Everything Is Born To Be Known 20:45, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
Ive heard that the dance is Bolivian, UNESCO has recogniced as Bolivian, dont know why Perubian still say that its theirs, here in NY i know many of them and they dont even know what the dance is like, anyway just a thought.
23 sept 2009
- Your toughts are incorrect. Peru claims that the dance belongs to all nations whose culture is associated with it. In other words, Peru claims that they, Chile, and Bolivia have equal rights upon the dance. However, it's only the idiotic government of Bolivia, and several ignorants from said nation, that claim the dance as their own. UNESCO has recognized the "Carnaval de Oruro" as an important patrimony of humanity, but has not said anything about who holds the ownership of the dances or music.--$%MarshalN20%$ (talk) 16:04, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
- Bolivia may be perhaps the country where the Daiblada has most signifation for the country as whole, but the claim of exclusivity is just a recent political claim. Any polemical statement of exclusivity, origin, or something simmilar should be removed from that artcile of not properly sourced. This article seems to need permanent watching. Dentren | 16:39, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
Sourcing
I'll try to find more sources about the dance. I don't really care much about it, but I don't agree with the random IP editors who vandalize the page and take advantage of the lack of reliable sources. My position is the same: The Diablada is a dance of Peru, Chile, and Bolivia. It's an important part of these 3 nation, and not one nation can claim exclusivity of this dance. Of course, if any other editor wishes to bring in other sources in order to build up on the article, they can feel free to do so.--$%MarshalN20%$ (talk) 17:44, 27 September 2009 (UTC)