| Revision as of 10:42, 29 September 2009 editThryduulf (talk | contribs)Oversighters, Administrators99,025 edits delete. deletion sorting← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:54, 29 September 2009 edit undoDustFormsWords (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers8,471 edits change voteNext edit → | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
| :({{findsources|Coolsmile}}) | :({{findsources|Coolsmile}}) | ||
| '''DELETE'''. Frankly, I feel that this is a speedy deletion candidate as no notability is asserted, but in any case it lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third parties. This entire category really needs to go save for one or two articles. :-( ] (]) 07:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | '''DELETE'''. Frankly, I feel that this is a speedy deletion candidate as no notability is asserted, but in any case it lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third parties. This entire category really needs to go save for one or two articles. :-( ] (]) 07:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy Delete''' (A7) article does not assert notability. |
*<s>'''Speedy Delete''' (A7) article does not assert notability.</s> '''Delete''' - article does not assert notability and therefore is unable to meet ]. - ] (]) 08:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Delete''' - while it meets the spirit of ] in that it makes not assertions of importance or notability at all, the CSD criteria are meant to be interpreted strictly and they don't include products so I am not not comfortable speedy deleting it myself. ] (]) 10:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | *'''Delete''' - while it meets the spirit of ] in that it makes not assertions of importance or notability at all, the CSD criteria are meant to be interpreted strictly and they don't include products so I am not not comfortable speedy deleting it myself. ] (]) 10:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 10:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)<!--Template:Delsort--></small> | *<small class="delsort-notice">'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. ] (]) 10:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)<!--Template:Delsort--></small> | ||
Revision as of 10:54, 29 September 2009
Coolsmile
- Coolsmile (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
DELETE. Frankly, I feel that this is a speedy deletion candidate as no notability is asserted, but in any case it lacks non-trivial coverage from reliable third parties. This entire category really needs to go save for one or two articles. :-( JBsupreme (talk) 07:58, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
Speedy Delete (A7) article does not assert notability.Delete - article does not assert notability and therefore is unable to meet WP:N. - DustFormsWords (talk) 08:06, 29 September 2009 (UTC)- Delete - while it meets the spirit of WP:CSD#A7 in that it makes not assertions of importance or notability at all, the CSD criteria are meant to be interpreted strictly and they don't include products so I am not not comfortable speedy deleting it myself. Thryduulf (talk) 10:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 10:42, 29 September 2009 (UTC)