| Revision as of 17:03, 26 September 2009 editBejnar (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers53,407 edits →Dawn chorus: missing footnote← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:06, 11 October 2009 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 3 thread(s) (older than 31d) to User talk:GRBerry/Archive 11.Next edit → | ||
| Line 37: | Line 37: | ||
| ;New sections belong at the bottom, not here. | ;New sections belong at the bottom, not here. | ||
| == USer:Ewen == | |||
| I have added an IP sock to the complaint and a link thet shows how Ewen is connected to it. You can see in his edits how he redirected the cyberanth a+ccount using it. Prima Facie evidence as well as the IP from his work.--] (]) 18:16, 27 August 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == FYI == | |||
| I quoted you in a comment I made at ]. ''']''' (]) 15:40, 8 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == Renaming SBC resurge/takeover article == | |||
| The article currently titled "]" will soon change its name. An early straw poll narrowed the choices to six alternatives, listed at: | |||
| ] | |||
| (once this thread is archived, see .) | |||
| If you wish to rank the names suggested there, please do so soon. Please put other comments BELOW rather than interpersed among suggested names. Thanks. --] (]) 18:27, 9 September 2009 (UTC) | |||
| == RSN thread == | == RSN thread == | ||
| Line 58: | Line 42: | ||
| Could you please take another look at ]? ''']''' (]) 15:02, 16 September 2009 (UTC) | Could you please take another look at ]? ''']''' (]) 15:02, 16 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
| ==Dawn chorus== | == Dawn chorus == | ||
| I realize that this was a long time ago, but in your to the ] article, in the edit summary you said,in part, "expand from ''Smithsonian'', April 2006, page 18." You did not put in a footnote giving the article's title and citation. I used the and looked at April 2006, but I did not find the article. Unfortunately, the electronic archive does not use page numbers. I was able to find another source that talked about the same Ecuadorian study. I assume, that at this point, your editing skills have improved, so that were you to make that same edit today, you would provide the full citation in a note. Thanks. --] (]) 17:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC) | I realize that this was a long time ago, but in your to the ] article, in the edit summary you said,in part, "expand from ''Smithsonian'', April 2006, page 18." You did not put in a footnote giving the article's title and citation. I used the and looked at April 2006, but I did not find the article. Unfortunately, the electronic archive does not use page numbers. I was able to find another source that talked about the same Ecuadorian study. I assume, that at this point, your editing skills have improved, so that were you to make that same edit today, you would provide the full citation in a note. Thanks. --] (]) 17:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:06, 11 October 2009
Template:WPChristianity sidebar • {{ChristianityWikiProject}} • Category:Unassessed-Class Christianity articles
Christianity Recognized Content • AFD results by nominator
I am also user GRBerry on Commons, Wikispecies, Meta, and (although I speak no German) de.Misplaced Pages. Messages intended for me on any of those projects may be left here, in which case I ask the poster to indicate which project they are talking about. GRBerry diffmeta diff I've also signed up for single user login.
| This talk page is automatically archived by User:MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 31 days are automatically archived to User talk:GRBerry/Archive 11. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
Email advice: When able to be active on Misplaced Pages, I am more likely to read this talk page than I am to read email, as the email goes to my work email. So please reserve email for items requiring 1) confidentiality, 2) the format (forwarding other emails), or 3) some other really good reason for using email. Also, to help it get through my spam filters and to my attention, have the email subject line begin with "Misplaced Pages". If at all possible, I will respond on Misplaced Pages, because I believe that transparency is important, and each user I email lessens my privacy. GRBerry
- Archive 1: April 20 to June 26, 2006
- Archive 2: June 27 to September 10, 2006
- Archive 3: September 11 to December 30, 2006
At this point I became an admin. Subsequent archives are by bot in the order conversations became stale rather than the order they were created.
- Archive 4: December 31, 2006 to January 27, 2007
- Archive 5: January 31, 2007 to May 31, 2007
- Archive 6: June 1, 2007 to September 1, 2007
- Archive 7: September 2, 2007 to October 29, 2007
- Archive 8: October 30, 2007 to December 31, 2007
- Archive 9: January 1, 2008 to March 31, 2008
- Archive 10: April 1, 2008 to August 31, 2008
- Archive 11: September 1, 2008 to ongoing
Early in period I voluntarily resigned as an admin. I do not currently have access to the administrative tools.
- New sections belong at the bottom, not here.
RSN thread
Could you please take another look at Misplaced Pages:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#60_Minutes_and_the_Assassination_of_Werner_Erhard? Cirt (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2009 (UTC)
Dawn chorus
I realize that this was a long time ago, but in your 00:46, 23 August 2006 edit to the Dawn chorus (birds) article, in the edit summary you said,in part, "expand from Smithsonian, April 2006, page 18." You did not put in a footnote giving the article's title and citation. I used the Smithsonian Magazine archive and looked at April 2006, but I did not find the article. Unfortunately, the electronic archive does not use page numbers. I was able to find another source that talked about the same Ecuadorian study. I assume, that at this point, your editing skills have improved, so that were you to make that same edit today, you would provide the full citation in a note. Thanks. --Bejnar (talk) 17:03, 26 September 2009 (UTC)