| Revision as of 01:34, 7 October 2009 editManning Bartlett (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users8,107 edits clerk fix - add MBisanz← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:10, 11 October 2009 edit undoCarcharoth (talk | contribs)Administrators73,579 edits →Advice to the parties: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{RFARcasenav|case name=Socionics|clerk1=MBisanz|clerk2=Lankiveil|draft arb=Carcharoth|draft arb2=}} | {{RFARcasenav|case name=Socionics|clerk1=MBisanz|clerk2=Lankiveil|draft arb=Carcharoth|draft arb2=}} | ||
| == Advice to the parties == | |||
| Leaving a brief note here to remind the parties of what I have said ]. The same point about content versus conduct applies to this workshop page. Please limit your proposals to those that focus on conduct and ways to remedy inappropriate conduct. Principles can cover content matters, but only in the broadest sense. Please don't turn this workshop page into a rehashing of the content dispute, with long threaded arguments. The aim here is to look for ways to resolve the dispute. When I have an idea of the shape of the case, I will post my proposed decision here for comments from other arbitrators and parties before moving to the voting stage. But that won't be for at least another week yet. ] (]) 22:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:10, 11 October 2009
|
Main case page (Talk) — Evidence (Talk) — Workshop (Talk) — Proposed decision (Talk) Case clerks: MBisanz (Talk) & Lankiveil (Talk) Drafting arbitrator: Carcharoth (Talk) |
Advice to the parties
Leaving a brief note here to remind the parties of what I have said here. The same point about content versus conduct applies to this workshop page. Please limit your proposals to those that focus on conduct and ways to remedy inappropriate conduct. Principles can cover content matters, but only in the broadest sense. Please don't turn this workshop page into a rehashing of the content dispute, with long threaded arguments. The aim here is to look for ways to resolve the dispute. When I have an idea of the shape of the case, I will post my proposed decision here for comments from other arbitrators and parties before moving to the voting stage. But that won't be for at least another week yet. Carcharoth (talk) 22:10, 11 October 2009 (UTC)