Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 01:18, 9 December 2009

Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute.

I can see you are familiar with Misplaced Pages, so don't jump the gun at Crucifixion and end up in trouble. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 20:13, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Blocked

Template:Z9

You have been blocked for edit warring with this edit. In addition, please mind your personal attacks with edits such as this aren't welcome. Your grudge against Tryptofish is clear, but please don't let it keep you from being civil. tedder (talk) 00:30, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Zengar Zombolt (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Notes:

• In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
• Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Once again, the other party is edit warring, I am attempting to uphold the consensus. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Once again, the other party is edit warring, I am attempting to uphold the consensus. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Once again, the other party is edit warring, I am attempting to uphold the consensus. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}

Unblocking admin, please see the rule I established at: Talk:Crucifixion in art#full protection.2C edit warring.2C consensus. Yzak, you know that, but keep in mind you can't simply exclude individuals and call it a consensus. tedder (talk) 00:55, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

When that individual has WP:Own issues and refuses to attempt to come to consensus with the 20+ people who disagree with him, I think it's the only way to continue constructive editing.Yzak Jule (talk)

(edit conflict) Read up the page from that section and one will see another 4 or so editors supporting the retention of a section covering this (possibly not with this current wording), with a recommendation to include further material. There was a clear consensus to remove the material from Crucifixion, but some editors seem to assume this means there is a consensus to remove the material from Misplaced Pages. This is not the case - this article was created to contain material which it was eventually agreed had no business being in Crucifixion. Elen of the Roads (talk) 01:05, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

I hesitate to comment here, and apologize if it is not appropriate, but I note that the editor states in his request for unblocking that I am edit warring. This is not true. I have been arguing my case on the talk page, but I have not been reverting on the page (other than one non-controversial reversion of vandalism). --Tryptofish (talk) 01:15, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

• Requests for unblock