Misplaced Pages

User talk:Omirocksthisworld: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 09:25, 27 January 2010 editNJA (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators30,514 editsm You have been blocked for edit-warring.← Previous edit Revision as of 09:30, 27 January 2010 edit undoOmirocksthisworld (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,673 editsmNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 116: Line 116:


<div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' to prevent further ] caused by your engagement in an ]&#32;at ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. ] <small> ]]'''</small> 09:25, 27 January 2010 (UTC)</div>{{z9}}<!-- Template:uw-ewblock --> <div class="user-block"> ] You have been ''']''' from editing for a period of '''31 hours''' to prevent further ] caused by your engagement in an ]&#32;at ]. During a dispute, you should first try to ] and seek ]. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may ] by adding the text <!-- Copy the text as it appears on your page, not as it appears in this edit area. Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --><nowiki>{{</nowiki>unblock|''your reason here''<nowiki>}}</nowiki><!-- Do not include the "nowiki" tags. --> below. ] <small> ]]'''</small> 09:25, 27 January 2010 (UTC)</div>{{z9}}<!-- Template:uw-ewblock -->
{{unblock|Although I understand that in recent days I have been involved in edit wars with IP addresses, I have tried with the IP addresses to first reach an agreement (see ] and ]), however they have proved unresponsive to my attempts to explain my reverts and have instead ignored my requests for discussion. I feel that I should not be blocked from editing, as I have tried to assume good faith with the editors and reason with them.}}

Revision as of 09:30, 27 January 2010

Hello, Omirocksthisworld! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! — Scientizzle 04:13, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines
The community
Writing articles
Miscellaneous



File:Divine Signs (HA).png

You put a invalid license on File:Divine Signs (HA).png. Only for use in Misplaced Pages is not a license we can accept here. It may be possible to justify the image under fair use, as long as write about the poster, not just the concept the poster illustrates. But you will need a fair use rationale. The same applies to the other posters. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:45, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Okay thanks for the info. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 23:34, 4 October 2009 (UTC))

Younus AlGohar

Hi, I've moved Younus algohar to Younus AlGohar ϢereSpielChequers 12:37, 1 October 2009 (UTC)


Fair use rationale for File:MFIatIranianEmbassy.JPG

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:MFIatIranianEmbassy.JPG. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Misplaced Pages constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:17, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. I have reduced the resolution of the image and added more information about why I think its suitable to keep. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 01:17, 2 January 2010 (UTC))

Edit War!!!

  • You don't belong to His Holiness Gohar Shahi, you dirty soul belongs to younas harami & Let me tell you that you are not working for the cause of His Holiness, but you are a group of opportunists. Don't mess up with us, otherwise we would open your reality to all.--116.71.2.18 (talk) 07:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
  • I hope you understand that in Misplaced Pages, we assume good faith with other editors, and do not automatically become hostile with other editors. Please understand that no edits done by myself to any of the Younus AlGohar, Messiah Foundation International or Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi articles were done as a personal attack. They are rather what I perceived to be constructive edits. I was merely pointing out to you editing this article to include"Son of a ......" as part of said person's name is vandalism. If you wish to add information or have any other objections, I would advise you to discuss it in the talk pages. Thanks for your cooperation. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 07:34, 11 January 2010 (UTC))
  • I've semi-protected both articles without the NPOV tag. If the edit war continues it will be met with by longer periods of protection and longer blocks for the IPs. I've asked that any issues be raised on the relevant talk pages. Mjroots (talk) 15:32, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Misplaced Pages pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:47, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Sorry I always forget about that. I'll try to remember from now on. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 07:18, 13 January 2010 (UTC))

January 2010: Sufism

There is an ongoing edit war in the article Sufism in the Sufi Sheikhs -> Riaz Ahmed Gohar Shahi sub-section of the article. Could we please discuss this issue on the talk page? See Misplaced Pages:Edit war. Thanks. Esowteric+Talk 10:35, 26 January 2010 (UTC)

  • Once again, please at the very least, attempt to be cooperative in improving the articles instead of re-pasting the same edit summary with every revert, as you have done here and here and here. Please stop the vandalism, and instead discuss why you believe the changes need to be made on the talk pages. Thank you —Preceding unsigned comment added by 116.71.15.61 (talk) 08:12, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Is there a reason for re-posting my own notice to you? (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 09:24, 27 January 2010 (UTC))

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Shirik (Questions or Comments?) 08:16, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for bringing it to the attention of those who can help. (Omirocksthisworld (talk) 09:22, 27 January 2010 (UTC))

Minor edits

"A check to the minor edit box signifies that only superficial differences exist between the current and previous versions: typographical corrections, formatting and presentational changes, rearrangement of text without modification of content, etc. A minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. An edit of this kind is marked in its page's revision history with a lower case, bolded "m" character (m)." Could you please be sure that you follow this guidelines? Odd, you're the 2nd person in about 5 minutes where I've posted this. Maybe it's catching? :-) Dougweller (talk) 08:53, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war at Messiah Foundation International. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. NJA (t/c) 09:25, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Template:Z9

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Omirocksthisworld (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Although I understand that in recent days I have been involved in edit wars with IP addresses, I have tried with the IP addresses to first reach an agreement (see Talk: Messiah Foundation International and Talk: Younus AlGohar), however they have proved unresponsive to my attempts to explain my reverts and have instead ignored my requests for discussion. I feel that I should not be blocked from editing, as I have tried to assume good faith with the editors and reason with them.

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Although I understand that in recent days I have been involved in edit wars with IP addresses, I have tried with the IP addresses to first reach an agreement (see ] and ]), however they have proved unresponsive to my attempts to explain my reverts and have instead ignored my requests for discussion. I feel that I should not be blocked from editing, as I have tried to assume good faith with the editors and reason with them. |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Although I understand that in recent days I have been involved in edit wars with IP addresses, I have tried with the IP addresses to first reach an agreement (see ] and ]), however they have proved unresponsive to my attempts to explain my reverts and have instead ignored my requests for discussion. I feel that I should not be blocked from editing, as I have tried to assume good faith with the editors and reason with them. |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Although I understand that in recent days I have been involved in edit wars with IP addresses, I have tried with the IP addresses to first reach an agreement (see ] and ]), however they have proved unresponsive to my attempts to explain my reverts and have instead ignored my requests for discussion. I feel that I should not be blocked from editing, as I have tried to assume good faith with the editors and reason with them. |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}
Category:
User talk:Omirocksthisworld: Difference between revisions Add topic