| Revision as of 21:05, 31 January 2010 editKnightLago (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users15,869 edits →Awaiting your reply: reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:05, 31 January 2010 edit undoMZMcBride (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users190,645 edits →Awaiting your reply: +replyNext edit → | ||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
| Hi KnightLago. I'm still awaiting a reply to my 02:09, 2<nowiki/>6 January 2010 (UTC) post here: ]. I may propose some findings and remedies based on your responses. Thanks! --] (]) 00:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | Hi KnightLago. I'm still awaiting a reply to my 02:09, 2<nowiki/>6 January 2010 (UTC) post here: ]. I may propose some findings and remedies based on your responses. Thanks! --] (]) 00:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :Done. ] (]) 21:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | :Done. ] (]) 21:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::Awesome. Thanks. :-) --] (]) 21:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:05, 31 January 2010
| Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
| This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 4 days are automatically archived to Archive 5. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
 Archives | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Verizoon
I commented on Verizoon's snarky comment on Jimbo's talk page, and suspected that the account might be a sock. I am curious about the process that led to the account being indef blocked.—Finell 22:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC) (To preserve the continuity of the conversation, I will watch for your reply, if any, here on your Talk page)
- I ran a checkuser report while looking into another matter and found this account. KnightLago (talk) 00:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for answering. However, don't you think that this should be explained somewhere? On the account's talk page, perhaps, or in a template on the talk or user page explaining the action and the reason for it? If the account is a sock, shouldn't that be logged someplace and the puppet master identified? Forgive me if I'm ignorant of how these things work.—Finell 06:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- It is a matter of preference. The person who was controlling this account is a banned user. Sometimes such accounts are tagged, and other times they are not in order to deny recognition. In this case, I chose the latter course of action. My block was identified as a checkuser block in the block log. That tells administrators not to unblock without either consulting me, or another checkuser. I hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks! KnightLago (talk) 17:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your thorough explanation. I was just trying to understand the process. I am not questioning your judgment.—Finell 00:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- No worries. KnightLago (talk) 00:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your thorough explanation. I was just trying to understand the process. I am not questioning your judgment.—Finell 00:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- It is a matter of preference. The person who was controlling this account is a banned user. Sometimes such accounts are tagged, and other times they are not in order to deny recognition. In this case, I chose the latter course of action. My block was identified as a checkuser block in the block log. That tells administrators not to unblock without either consulting me, or another checkuser. I hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks! KnightLago (talk) 17:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for answering. However, don't you think that this should be explained somewhere? On the account's talk page, perhaps, or in a template on the talk or user page explaining the action and the reason for it? If the account is a sock, shouldn't that be logged someplace and the puppet master identified? Forgive me if I'm ignorant of how these things work.—Finell 06:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Awaiting your reply
Hi KnightLago. I'm still awaiting a reply to my 02:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC) post here: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MZMcBride 2. I may propose some findings and remedies based on your responses. Thanks! --MZMcBride (talk) 00:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done. KnightLago (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Awesome. Thanks. :-) --MZMcBride (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)