Revision as of 13:54, 1 February 2010 editTyw7 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,149 edits →Sockpuppet: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:54, 1 February 2010 edit undoTyw7 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers25,149 edits →SockpuppetNext edit → | ||
Line 34: | Line 34: | ||
== Sockpuppet == | == Sockpuppet == | ||
I would like you to perform a checkuser on {{09jamieboro}} to see if he have created another account to bypass the block as he said he would in his unblock request. Thanks!--<font face="Kristen ITC" color="Green">]</font> (] • ]) ''Changing the world one edit at a time!'' 13:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC) | I would like you to perform a checkuser on {{user|09jamieboro}} to see if he have created another account to bypass the block as he said he would in his unblock request. Thanks!--<font face="Kristen ITC" color="Green">]</font> (] • ]) ''Changing the world one edit at a time!'' 13:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:54, 1 February 2010
Welcome to my talk page. Please sign and date your entries by inserting ~~~~ at the end. Start a new talk topic. |
This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 4 days are automatically archived to Archive 5. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
Archives | ||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||
This page has archives. Sections older than 4 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 1 section is present. |
Verizoon
I commented on Verizoon's snarky comment on Jimbo's talk page, and suspected that the account might be a sock. I am curious about the process that led to the account being indef blocked.—Finell 22:13, 27 January 2010 (UTC) (To preserve the continuity of the conversation, I will watch for your reply, if any, here on your Talk page)
- I ran a checkuser report while looking into another matter and found this account. KnightLago (talk) 00:48, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for answering. However, don't you think that this should be explained somewhere? On the account's talk page, perhaps, or in a template on the talk or user page explaining the action and the reason for it? If the account is a sock, shouldn't that be logged someplace and the puppet master identified? Forgive me if I'm ignorant of how these things work.—Finell 06:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- It is a matter of preference. The person who was controlling this account is a banned user. Sometimes such accounts are tagged, and other times they are not in order to deny recognition. In this case, I chose the latter course of action. My block was identified as a checkuser block in the block log. That tells administrators not to unblock without either consulting me, or another checkuser. I hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks! KnightLago (talk) 17:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your thorough explanation. I was just trying to understand the process. I am not questioning your judgment.—Finell 00:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- No worries. KnightLago (talk) 00:42, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for your thorough explanation. I was just trying to understand the process. I am not questioning your judgment.—Finell 00:41, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- It is a matter of preference. The person who was controlling this account is a banned user. Sometimes such accounts are tagged, and other times they are not in order to deny recognition. In this case, I chose the latter course of action. My block was identified as a checkuser block in the block log. That tells administrators not to unblock without either consulting me, or another checkuser. I hope this helps. Please let me know if you have any more questions. Thanks! KnightLago (talk) 17:43, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for answering. However, don't you think that this should be explained somewhere? On the account's talk page, perhaps, or in a template on the talk or user page explaining the action and the reason for it? If the account is a sock, shouldn't that be logged someplace and the puppet master identified? Forgive me if I'm ignorant of how these things work.—Finell 06:47, 28 January 2010 (UTC)
Awaiting your reply
Hi KnightLago. I'm still awaiting a reply to my 02:09, 26 January 2010 (UTC) post here: Misplaced Pages talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/MZMcBride 2. I may propose some findings and remedies based on your responses. Thanks! --MZMcBride (talk) 00:17, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Done. KnightLago (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
- Awesome. Thanks. :-) --MZMcBride (talk) 21:05, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
Sockpuppet
I would like you to perform a checkuser on 09jamieboro (talk · contribs) to see if he have created another account to bypass the block as he said he would in his unblock request. Thanks!--Tyw7 (Talk • Contributions) Changing the world one edit at a time! 13:54, 1 February 2010 (UTC)