Misplaced Pages

User talk:Sourside21: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 01:47, 12 February 2010 view sourceSourside21 (talk | contribs)388 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 02:24, 12 February 2010 view source Scorpion0422 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers68,507 edits OnLiveNext edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


Dude, I happen to agree with you about the ] edit, it's uncited speculation. However, you are doing yourself no favours by failing to explain your reasons for the edit and continuously blanking your comments page. You have nothing to hide, and your edit makes sense. The issue is one of explanation and openness. Cheers ] (]) 07:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC) Dude, I happen to agree with you about the ] edit, it's uncited speculation. However, you are doing yourself no favours by failing to explain your reasons for the edit and continuously blanking your comments page. You have nothing to hide, and your edit makes sense. The issue is one of explanation and openness. Cheers ] (]) 07:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

==3RR warning==
You've actually violated it already, but here's the warning anyway:

]
Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly{{#if:World Wrestling Entertainment|, as you are doing at ]}}. If you continue, you may be ] from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for ], even if they do not technically violate the ]. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.<!-- Template:3RR -->

And please do not accuse me of being a sock/meat puppet. I noticed your accusation of Wrestlinglover on my watchlist and was curious. -- ]<sup>]</sup> 02:24, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:24, 12 February 2010

OnLive

Dude, I happen to agree with you about the OnLive edit, it's uncited speculation. However, you are doing yourself no favours by failing to explain your reasons for the edit and continuously blanking your comments page. You have nothing to hide, and your edit makes sense. The issue is one of explanation and openness. Cheers MrMarmite (talk) 07:52, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

3RR warning

You've actually violated it already, but here's the warning anyway:

Warning
Warning

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing at World Wrestling Entertainment. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.

And please do not accuse me of being a sock/meat puppet. I noticed your accusation of Wrestlinglover on my watchlist and was curious. -- Scorpion 02:24, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Sourside21: Difference between revisions Add topic