| Revision as of 06:10, 13 February 2010 editNotAnonymous0 (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers6,320 edits →February 2010← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:12, 13 February 2010 edit undoLedgendGamer (talk | contribs)Rollbackers9,575 edits →3RR violation on Loren Legarda: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| ] Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been ]. Please make use of the ] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ] (]) 06:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | ] Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to ], without giving a valid reason for the removal in the ]. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been ]. Please make use of the ] if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.<!-- Template:uw-delete2 --> ] (]) 06:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :Sorry, I thought that the edit was vandalism because it was removal of content without any edit summary. ] (]) 06:10, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | :Sorry, I thought that the edit was vandalism because it was removal of content without any edit summary. ] (]) 06:10, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == 3RR violation on ] == | |||
| ] You currently appear to be engaged in an ''']'''  according to the reverts you have made on ]. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the ]. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to ] to work towards wording and content that gains a ] among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek ], and in some cases it may be appropriate to request ]. Please stop the disruption, otherwise '''you may be ] from editing'''. <!-- Template:uw-3rr --> ''If the two of you continue to edit war over the article, I will personally see to it that both of you are sent to ] and ]. From there, you might see yourself blocked if you do not agree to stop fighting and take the issue to the ]. Although I am an uninvolved editor, the war going on here is ridiculous. Stop edit warring. '''This is your only warning.''''' '''''—<font color="black">]</font>'''<font color="blue">]</font>'' 08:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:12, 13 February 2010
Welcome!
Hi GiannaManiego! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Misplaced Pages community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
Alternatively, the contributing to Misplaced Pages page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
Happy editing! --blue520 07:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Misplaced Pages. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--blue520 07:13, 12 February 2010 (UTC)
February 2010
Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Misplaced Pages, as you did to Loren Legarda, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Notanonymous0 (talk) 06:04, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry, I thought that the edit was vandalism because it was removal of content without any edit summary. Notanonymous0 (talk) 06:10, 13 February 2010 (UTC)
3RR violation on Loren Legarda
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Loren Legarda. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. If the two of you continue to edit war over the article, I will personally see to it that both of you are sent to WP:AIV and WP:AN3RR. From there, you might see yourself blocked if you do not agree to stop fighting and take the issue to the talk page. Although I am an uninvolved editor, the war going on here is ridiculous. Stop edit warring. This is your only warning. —LedgendGamer 08:12, 13 February 2010 (UTC)