| Revision as of 01:48, 29 January 2010 editTekaphor (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,291 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:51, 17 February 2010 edit undoSam Weller (talk | contribs)1,022 edits →Problem user(s): new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
| ::Thanks, and sorry for the late reply. I have been keeping a cursory eye on the situation, but I am not able to get deeply involved right now, especially when the issues stretch my interest. - ] (]) 02:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC) | ::Thanks, and sorry for the late reply. I have been keeping a cursory eye on the situation, but I am not able to get deeply involved right now, especially when the issues stretch my interest. - ] (]) 02:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == Problem user(s) == | |||
| Hi Tek | |||
| I noticed you've been working on MUS recently. Given the remarkable way the MUS meme was propagated last year, you might want to be aware of this: | |||
| Recruitment, or reactivation here: followed by: | |||
| *Mass revert at CFS | |||
| *Deletion of other users' comments about KCCO's problematic editing at WPI: | |||
| *Unsubtantiable claim that I attacked her, with a threat of blocking, on my userpage. | |||
| I've asked other recently involved editors with more arbitration savvy than I have (TerryE, Ward20 and StevieNic) to look into this, and I thought you might like to know as well. Thanks, ] (]) 16:51, 17 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:51, 17 February 2010
Click here to start a new message section at the bottom of this talkpage.
TALKPAGE ARCHIVES
General statement at XMRV
Hi, I wrote a little warning for everyone at XMRV. I think going back to the strict sourcing requirements is the only resolution that will bring some peace to the article. Cheers! Keepcalmandcarryon (talk) 15:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)
- OK, thanks. - Tekaphor (TALK) 03:59, 9 January 2010 (UTC)
Whittemore Peterson Institute
We seem to be sliding into an edit war on this one. KCOC is very singular minded, e.g hist latest revert was a reference for funding for the WPI "to serve patients with Neuro-immune diseases such as ME/CFS, atypical MS, Fibromyalgia, Gulf War Illness and Autism, ..." from Congresswoman Berkley's official state website was not an RS since not being a medical expert this is of "secondary relevance" to other RS (e.g the Guardian Newspaper). If I revert I will trigger 3RR. You might want to track this. -- TerryE (talk) 21:46, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
- Please see Request for discussion on triggering Edit War Process. Feel free to contribute to this discussion if you wish. I apologise for contacting all contributors, but I have been asked to be impartial by another editor working on this page. -- TerryE (talk) 01:10, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks, and sorry for the late reply. I have been keeping a cursory eye on the situation, but I am not able to get deeply involved right now, especially when the issues stretch my interest. - Tekaphor (TALK) 02:22, 26 January 2010 (UTC)
Problem user(s)
Hi Tek
I noticed you've been working on MUS recently. Given the remarkable way the MUS meme was propagated last year, you might want to be aware of this:
Recruitment, or reactivation here: followed by:
I've asked other recently involved editors with more arbitration savvy than I have (TerryE, Ward20 and StevieNic) to look into this, and I thought you might like to know as well. Thanks, Sam Weller (talk) 16:51, 17 February 2010 (UTC)