Revision as of 16:11, 23 February 2010 editUltraexactzz (talk | contribs)26,830 edits also← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:40, 24 February 2010 edit undo12056 (talk | contribs)340 edits Requesting speedy deletion (CSD U1). (TW)Next edit → | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{db-userreq|rationale=I want my account to be deleted and all information associated with it!}} | |||
{{unblock-auto reviewed|172.190.105.236|]|Caknuck|decline=You have been blocked directly. Please use the plain old {{tl|unblock}} templatate, providing a reason. — <small>(] · ]) · ] · </small> 03:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)}} | {{unblock-auto reviewed|172.190.105.236|]|Caknuck|decline=You have been blocked directly. Please use the plain old {{tl|unblock}} templatate, providing a reason. — <small>(] · ]) · ] · </small> 03:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)}} | ||
{{unblock reviewed|1=original unblock reason|decline=I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that | {{unblock reviewed|1=original unblock reason|decline=I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that |
Revision as of 23:40, 24 February 2010
This talk page may meet Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion as a user page or subpage requested to be deleted by its user. Note that in some cases such pages may need to be retained for administrative purposes. Before deleting, administrators are advised to check the contribution history of such pages to be sure they are not deleting a user talk page that has been moved. See CSD U1.%5B%5BWP%3ACSD%23U1%7CU1%5D%5D%3A+User+request+to+delete+page+in+own+userspace+%E2%80%93+If+you+wish+to+retrieve+it%2C+please+see+%5B%5BWP%3AREFUND%5D%5DU1 I want my account to be deleted and all information associated with it!
If this talk page does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, please remove this notice. This page was last edited by 12056 (contribs | logs) at 23:40, 24 February 2010 (UTC) (14 years ago) |
- 12056 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
- 172.190.105.236 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)
Block message:
Decline reason: You have been blocked directly. Please use the plain old {{unblock}} templatate, providing a reason. — (X! · talk) · @197 · 03:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).12056 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
original unblock reason
Decline reason:
I am declining your request for unblock because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Misplaced Pages, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read our guide to appealing blocks for more information. (X! · talk) · @197 · 03:44, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
After your block expires
Please, please, please read WP:PROTECT before making any more requests to RFPP. Your excessive requests are getting to be a bit disruptive. Thank you. Connormah (talk | contribs) 04:46, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
- Also, you're going to want to have a look at WP:PROD; if an article is already proposed for deletion, it is disruptive to nominate it for deletion via AFD, especially if you don't actually say why. When your block expires, please stop. Thank you. UltraExactZZ ~ Did 16:11, 23 February 2010 (UTC)