| Revision as of 03:23, 28 February 2010 editBuickCenturyDriver (talk | contribs)11,314 edits →Re: Closing RFAs: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:30, 28 February 2010 edit undoFruit.Smoothie (talk | contribs)380 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
| I only closed because it expired and was clearly not going to succeed but then again if it's a problem to you, I'll leave it to the user. –]] 03:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC) | I only closed because it expired and was clearly not going to succeed but then again if it's a problem to you, I'll leave it to the user. –]] 03:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC) | ||
| so i herd u liek 4chan? ] (]) 06:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:30, 28 February 2010
I hold the SUL account for NuclearWarfare
| |||||||||||||||||
| This is NuclearWarfare's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
|
Wait! Are you here because your article was speedy deleted? Click here before leaving a message to find out why. |
 Archives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Vandals get off far too easily - Join the discussion
Do you believe that vandals get off far too easily? I'm thinking about proposing a change to the blocking policy, but I would be interested in hearing others' opinions first. Please feel free to leave your thoughts at User:NuclearWarfare/Vandal Warnings, and invite anyone you wish to the discussion. NW (Talk) 00:52, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
Re: Closing RFAs
I only closed because it expired and was clearly not going to succeed but then again if it's a problem to you, I'll leave it to the user. –BuickCenturyDriver 03:23, 28 February 2010 (UTC)
so i herd u liek 4chan? Fruit.Smoothie (talk) 06:30, 28 February 2010 (UTC)