| Revision as of 04:18, 5 May 2010 editHerostratus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers53,314 edits →Is there a need for this project?: well← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:27, 5 May 2010 edit undoHerostratus (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers53,314 edits →moved from main page, re topic mentorship: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| :::I would be interested helping revive this project. It's a little discouraging that the project page does not list any active participants. - ] (]) 16:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | :::I would be interested helping revive this project. It's a little discouraging that the project page does not list any active participants. - ] (]) 16:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::::Well, you are certainly very welcome to contribute to project-related articles, simply by doing so individually. The project itself would need to be revived only if there were a need to coordinate and to disseminate information to a group, I guess. Anyway, the project should be revivified if and only if there is a person/people, dedicated to the original intent of the project, willing to attend to the project pages, as this subject tends to accumulate trollery if unattended. ] (]) 04:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC) | ::::Well, you are certainly very welcome to contribute to project-related articles, simply by doing so individually. The project itself would need to be revived only if there were a need to coordinate and to disseminate information to a group, I guess. Anyway, the project should be revivified if and only if there is a person/people, dedicated to the original intent of the project, willing to attend to the project pages, as this subject tends to accumulate trollery if unattended. ] (]) 04:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == moved from main page, re topic mentorship == | |||
| The following comment was removed from the main page. It belongs on a talk page: | |||
| :''It is not my impression that Misplaced Pages:Pedophile topic mentorship is inactive, on the contrary, it seems to have superseded the current WikiProject in a way so that the articles which it surveils aren't tagged with this project's signature. __] (]) 21:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)'' | |||
| (My response is, this may have been my error, and if so, sorry, and anyone who wants to can restore the topic mentorship to its correct place. ] (]) 04:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC)) | |||
Revision as of 04:27, 5 May 2010
|
This miscellaneous page was nominated for deletion on 7 Feb 2006. The result of the discussion was No consensus to delete. An archived record of this discussion can be found here. |
 Archives |
| 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 |
|
Talk page archive of obsoleted subpage "Terminology" - circa 2006 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Is there a need for this project?
Is this project really needed? Isn't this topic covered pretty well by wp:SEX and wp:PORN? Please contact me on my talk page for a reply. - Stillwaterising (talk) 14:28, 13 April 2010 (UTC)
- I haven't quite understood what happened to this WikiProject. I think it used to be very active, and there certainly has been a lot of heated controversy related to the articles that are within the scope of this project. I think there is still some activity at Misplaced Pages:Pedophile topic mentorship which started as a subpage of this project (i.e. Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Pedophilia Article Watch/Pedophile topic mentorship). It's been my impression that a number of purported childlove advocates have been run off Misplaced Pages and banned from editing, and this project or perhaps more accurately a portion of its members may have been instrumental in those procedings. __meco (talk) 22:03, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, this project does still serve a purpose. It helps coordinate editing of pedophilia-related articles. Will Beback talk 23:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
- I would be interested helping revive this project. It's a little discouraging that the project page does not list any active participants. - Stillwaterising (talk) 16:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Well, you are certainly very welcome to contribute to project-related articles, simply by doing so individually. The project itself would need to be revived only if there were a need to coordinate and to disseminate information to a group, I guess. Anyway, the project should be revivified if and only if there is a person/people, dedicated to the original intent of the project, willing to attend to the project pages, as this subject tends to accumulate trollery if unattended. Herostratus (talk) 04:18, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- I would be interested helping revive this project. It's a little discouraging that the project page does not list any active participants. - Stillwaterising (talk) 16:53, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, this project does still serve a purpose. It helps coordinate editing of pedophilia-related articles. Will Beback talk 23:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
moved from main page, re topic mentorship
The following comment was removed from the main page. It belongs on a talk page:
- It is not my impression that Misplaced Pages:Pedophile topic mentorship is inactive, on the contrary, it seems to have superseded the current WikiProject in a way so that the articles which it surveils aren't tagged with this project's signature. __meco (talk) 21:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
(My response is, this may have been my error, and if so, sorry, and anyone who wants to can restore the topic mentorship to its correct place. Herostratus (talk) 04:27, 5 May 2010 (UTC))