Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 02:01, 22 June 2010

User talk:Ckatz

Ckatz is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.If you have an urgent matter, it may be best to use email. I'll check in when I can, but please understand that circumstances may create a significant delay between when you post and when I am able to respond. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

Archives

Index Page One Page Two Page Three Page Four Page Five Page Six Page Seven Page Eight Page Nine Page Ten

Frequently asked questions

• Where can I learn more about editing Misplaced Pages?
  • The best place to start is at the Help Desk. Other useful links include the style guide, the list of policies and guidelines, and the guide to editing. Please feel free to ask on my talk page if you have any questions.
• Why was the link I added removed from an article?
  • Typically, links are removed because they fail the external links guideline. Although many links are deleted because they were placed by spammers, links to good sites are also removed on a regular basis. This is because Misplaced Pages isn't a directory service; the mere fact a site exists does not mean it warrants a link.
• Why was my article deleted?
  • Pages can be deleted for many reasons; there are very specific criteria that govern the process. Please review this article for more information.
• Why was information relating to my company or organization removed?
  • This is a very common question, based on a misunderstanding of Misplaced Pages's purpose. This project is not a directory, forum, or search engine, and as such it is not a place for you to post advertisements about your company or your product.
• Why were my spelling changes reverted?

Misplaced Pages's Manual of Style recommends the use of regional varieties of English, based on the topic and the article's contribution history. Please avoid changing spellings unless they differ from the appropriate version. Most spell checking software can be configured to use British and American English; some extend this to include other varieties such as Canadian or Australian English.

Reverted changes - please explain

Please let me know why you reverted the changes to:

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Conservative_Party_of_Canada&direction=prev&oldid=337361167

I had posted the following information, directly related to the subject, which has factual evidence supporting it....

The decision has subsequently given rise to a grassroots protest group, created by Christopher White on December 30, 2009, on the Facebook website entitled "Canadians Against Proroguing Parliament" which has been featured in global news headlines and attracted a membership of over 150,000 in its first 12 days of being online.

cmt

Reverting of affective computing and e-mail

The modifications I did to affective computing and e-mail were partly coming from my articles, which cite other sources. Consequently, these ideas are not only mines, and, furthermore, you make a mistake when confounding citing sources and making self-promotion.

Casio Watch Links

Hi,

Sir i am the collector of vintage Casio digital LCD watches, calculator watches and melody alarm chronographs and games watches. i made a site on Casio digital watches CasioDigitalWatches.com, which contain information about vintage Casio digital LCD watches and i also made a site on vintage rare digital LCD Watches RareDigitalWatches.com which also contain pictures of vintage digital watches from Casio Seiko and Citizen. and they both sites contain just information and pictures vintage digital watches to help digital watches collectors. i am not spamming and i just want my both websites will add in the any of Casio watch related article external links on wikipedia, so please allow me add these both sites on Calculator Watches Article. or suggest me any of your article which will be suitable to my sites.

Sorry for my Poor English.

Waiting for your early Positive reply.

Please reply in my messages.

Thanks and Warm Ragards Kashif

Talkback

Tea Studies Index(Non-encyclopedic content.)

Tea Studies Index Can you give me some suggestions on what needs changing(format), also where can I ask for help for others to participate in helping.

Below are some reasons for the need of this article

• 1. On wiki there are many sections on terminology and classification.
• 2. A Tea Studies Index information/article.
• 3. In the Chinese language, there is a very detailed complete tea studies, terminology, and index, yet English has none yet.
• 4. I propose this Tea Studies Index just like other fields have specialized terminology, index, and classification.
• 5. The Tea Studies Index information/article I am the writer/owner, yet I give full permission to the wiki website for use and revisement or such, and give the above information to public domain use. No copyright infringements, any of this article's info, as been derived from posts from my blog (5 years noncommercial and I am the only poster therefore no permission needed)dedicated to tea studies education Where I have posted some of this information about tea studies index. We also will be using this information at Tenfu Tea College and throught the tea studies community.
• "http://en.wikipedia.org/Talk:Tea_Studies_Index some of the above info is from "

External Reference and permission

• Cited from the book.
• “Chinese-English Tea Studies Terminology”,Translators and Editors: Tsai, Rong-Tsang and Steven R. Jones(me)

Lu-Yu Tea Culture Institute, Co., Ltd. (2010), ISBN978-957-9690-06-5《中英文茶學術語》 ( 陸羽茶藝股份有限公司 , 2010, ISBN978-957-9690-06-5) 編譯者：蔡榮章‧瓊斯史迪芬

• Tefu Tea College
• We give Misplaced Pages this article/post Tea Studies Index for usage and public domain.

about your message

Bye for now.

About Alhambra

Hi Ckatz,

I write about your editing in the Alhambra page. I added a couple of sites I think that have the most complete information about the monument.

AlhambraDeGranada.org is an old page with very detailed descriptions of the places inside the Alhambra. An exalmple is the Places and spots section (http://www.alhambradegranada.org/en/info/placesandspots.asp).

Alhambra-patronato.es is the official website.

So, I think they should be there.

I wait for your comments. Best regards :)

Javilillo74

Koobits

Hi Ckatz, my article got into some trouble. http://en.wikipedia.org/Koobits Could you please help me?

It says:

This article has multiple issues. Please help improve the article or discuss these issues on the talk page.

   * The notability of this article's subject is in question. If notability cannot be established, it may be listed for deletion or removed. Tagged since April 2010.
   * It is written like an advertisement and needs to be rewritten from a neutral point of view. Tagged since April 2010.
   * It may require general cleanup to meet Misplaced Pages's quality standards. Tagged since April 2010.
   * It may have been edited by a person who has a conflict of interest with the subject matter. Tagged since April 2010.

How to establish notability? The article was written form a neutral point of view, with references showing the facts. Why is it considered not notable?

In http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia:Notability, it says

If an article fails to cite sufficient sources to demonstrate the notability of its subject, look for sources yourself, or:

   * Ask the article's creator or an expert on the subject for advice on where to look for sources.

* Put the

The topic of this article may not meet Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. Find sources: "Ckatz" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (Learn how and when to remove this message)

tag on the article to alert other editors. * If the article is about a specialized field, use the

This article needs attention from an expert on the subject. Please add a reason or a talk parameter to this template to explain the issue with the article. When placing this tag, consider associating this request with a WikiProject.

tag with a specific WikiProject to attract editors knowledgeable about that field, who may have access to reliable sources not available online. I believe there are sufficient coverage in the page reinforcing the validity or notability for that matter. Does the problem lie with the

The topic of this article may not meet Misplaced Pages's general notability guideline. Please help to demonstrate the notability of the topic by citing reliable secondary sources that are independent of the topic and provide significant coverage of it beyond a mere trivial mention. If notability cannot be shown, the article is likely to be merged, redirected, or deleted. Find sources: "Ckatz" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (Learn how and when to remove this message)

tag?

I did not change the content. Why the sudden warning? Will there be future warnings even if there are no changes to the content? Is it possible for other users to sabotage a page by falsely alleging that the page is not ‘notable’, or any other kinds of complaints for that matter?

I use DELL as an example, they seem to have no problem. Why do I have so many problems? =(

I feel so sad when my article gets rejected. Please help me! Thank you!

Night of the Living Dead revert

Hi. I'm just wondering why you reverted my last edit to the Night of the Living Dead page. I thought that the info about the DVD extras for the Reanimated film would be of interest. Good evening.DrJohnnyDiablo (talk) 00:01, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

unreferenced or poorly referenced material

ouch! that was cruel! please help me to improve by citing those articles to which i have erred, rather than leaving me guessing.
i can only think it was either the bbc sourced infomation on the arrest of christian bale, or information on david caruso and kim delaney,as the tabloid which i used as a source i have lost.Richmex2010 (talk) 03:30, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Language and tone

WRT your complaint to Ohconfucius on my talk page: you clearly do take offence at "campaign" etc. I don't want anyone to cause offence to anyone; but please be aware that your language contains words and phrases that might give offence, too; and that you tend to personalise, usually with reference to me. This should stop on both sides, if at all possible. One of the problems I see is that you don't appear to engage in substantive issues; but you take offence even at the last two suggestions, I know. Can you at least acknowledge that these are the appearance to some other editors? If you were more forthcoming in discussion—in terms of the technicalities, the nuts and bolts of the issue, rather than who changed what, when—I think there would be more opportunity for productive engagement. Tony (talk) 03:56, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Tony, you say you wish to have productive engagement. Here's a good starting point: please stop misrepresenting the people who disagree with you. For example, you have repeatedly announced to the community that I want to link everything. I cannot comprehend why you insist on doing that, especially since I've told you that is incorrect many, many times, I've asked you over and over not to keep making such misleading statements, and - perhaps most telling - I do not actually do anything of the sort. I'm sure you would find it very frustrating if I had been repeatedly telling other editors that you hate links and won't rest until articles are completely in plain text. How are we supposed to move forward in such an environment? --Ckatz_spy 04:47, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

hi

can i edit Avatar (2009) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mrjbond007 (talk • contribs) 15:43, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

WP:MOSLINK

Hi, you seem to be rather highly charged at the moment, reverting some wording which has been stable for some months. FYI, the wording you took out has been stable since at least January 2009. I'm not going to participate in the edit-war you seem to have set off, backed by your call-to-arms, unless you decide to escalate. I would remind you that when I made a few small changes to the wording, you advocated discussion for the sake of 'stability'. I hope nothing has changed. I would suggest that this unilateral move to destabilise the guideline be reversed by your own efforts, then discussed (of course). Thanks, Ohconfucius 01:14, 22 June 2010 (UTC)