Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 12:46, 7 July 2010

File:Animalibrí.gifFile:Animalibrí.gifFile:Animalibrí.gifFile:Animalibrí.gifFile:Animalibrí.gifFile:Animalibrí.gifFile:Animalibrí.gifFile:Animalibrí.gifFile:Animalibrí.gifFile:Animalibrí.gifFile:Animalibrí.gifFile:Animalibrí.gif

Poetic justice

Because you created this, I feel the compulsion to point out this. All the best, rebound, and get well soon! Sluzzelin talk 21:55, 28 May 2010 (UTC)---

Hehe. But mine is the list of lists! I can not credit that it hasn't been deleted yet. Last time I voted Delete myself. No go. Bishonen | talk 22:59, 28 May 2010 (UTC).

Bishes Still Sick?

Little Gooch bring get well messages for all the Bishes! Feel better now? Gooch (talk) 17:07, 3 June 2010 (UTC)

Bishsocks feel some better perhaps! Great Zilla tear down hospital, keep plenty maggot cheese in pocket! Gooch got some nice seafood for trusty User:Frutti di Mare also ? Bishonen | talk 17:44, 8 June 2010 (UTC).

Hope your health probs aren't too serious. GoodDay (talk) 23:25, 7 June 2010 (UTC)

Oh, nothing. Head fall off, is all. Bishonen | talk 17:44, 8 June 2010 (UTC).

Glue! We have glue! And high quality duct tape! Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 18:05, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Zilla jocularly wrap self all over in duck tape. Fear the mummy! Eat the crawdads! bishzilla _ROARR!!

It's duct tape, and gaffa tape works better... for all sorts of things. See my usepage at certain times for a message about this ;)

Have a hot lemon at Dewa Warung, Ibu Dewa is kewl. Best wishes, Jack Merridew 19:00, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Have Duck tape in Dino-land. Mmmmm roast duck make Bishes better? T-RexxS (talk) 19:22, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Snapped polar-roid of rampaging Duck Zilla Mummy. See!

Great photo. Not capture flaming Tokyo so well, though. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 19:27, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you fearsome Dino for beautiful portrait of best-looking wikipedian ! For folk etymology and quack etymology, read Talk:Duck tape ! bishzilla _ROARR!! 20:19, 8 June 2010 (UTC).

The rosy paths of FAC lead inexorably to FAR and the dreaded "fact" templates

And why pray have you deleted this User Bishonen/Bang? - I was quite enjoying its leisurely production. You can't go arownd deleting things just because silly old Ottava is talking rot on WR and the FA crowd here seem of a similar pursuasion. Take a leaf out of my book and go for the stress-free FA and GA - you write them, but don't bother to go through the lamentable process of getting them FAd - then they are safe because those who dedicate their lives to "improving" the project only look and improve the already accepted good pages, they think all the rest are rubbish and beneath their great talents and leave them alone. My way, you still churn good stuff out and no one tells you that you are crap - simple! By the way, have a look at my new page; it has great photos (I took them myself said with no modesty at all and even edited out a horrible dog pissing up a tree - even Durova has never done that - I think) I am currently working on one of my "dolls' houses" to illustrate it, it's going to be my best page ever ('cos I actually like the house and its got a nice story - like your Bang - a nice old lady completely restored it with love - actually it's nothing like your Bang) but you will see what I mean, you just write an "NFA" (NottaFeaturedArticle) instead of an FA. Hope all is well! Love  Giacomo  08:26, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Love the nice old lady, but please tell Ottava he's not supposed to practise his "pissing up trees" skills in public, Giacomo! Bishonen | talk 23:23, 23 June 2010 (UTC).

Why not startle someone?

		The Half Barnstar
		You get to choose who receives the adroit half; best if it is someone who least expects it! LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:16, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Two things, it is the left edit button for this section... and 'Zilla will not be startled, even if you close your eyes while making the suggestion. Thirdly, ignore on page pleadings to be considered (unless you really want to...) LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:24, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

... Daedalus... Elonka... Chillum's sock... No, I wouldn't know what page to put that one on. Oh dear, there are so many surprising choices. Hmm. Oh, it'll come to me in a dream. Tomorrow, the little Less may check it out and be startled. (Jimbo! He wouldn't half be startled!) And can I give the person a crapload of halves of my flutterers from up top, too? Bishonen | talk 22:04, 24 June 2010 (UTC).

Careful, they may be watching this page... which means Jimbo is still in the running. You can wrap it however you like, but I shall deliver the other half barnstar - the messenger hopefully being part of the "surprise". LessHeard vanU (talk) 22:08, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

• I expect you will want to give the other half to me, considering the miles I have walked whilst exercising your bizarre menagerie around Hyde Park every morning throughout your indisposition. Have you any idea of the looks one receives, well, when I say one, I mean Oleg, my new under footman, who actually does the walking (I am forced to supervise from my bedroom window) as Stansilas (my Lithuanian plumber) hates to be woken early by a cold bed. Oleg returns each morning a shivering wreck from the stares of the leather-clad, long haired weirdos and perverts who inhabit the park in the early morning - at one time one only met guardsmen doing their duty there at 6am. However, I am full of suggestions for suitable recipients - do just call if you need any further advice. Lady Catherine de Burgh (the Late) (talk) 22:25, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

• Yes, dear lady.. soon.. Less Heard, er, they may be watching? Que? I hope so; what's the use of my remarks if they're not? Meanwhile, please go amaze Ohconfucius ! Oh, and I'd better give Little Stupid a star of his own soon, he's looking quite green with envy. As indeed is Lady Catherine. Thank you for your fine scheme, Little Less! Bishonen | talk 10:13, 25 June 2010 (UTC).

• Two and a half pointed thing duly delivered. ;~) LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:35, 25 June 2010 (UTC)

• There seems to be a small-circle discussion going on here, which resulted in me being given the other half of the barnstar for which I am thankful but not sure I deserve it. How far do I have to delve before I understand what's going on, I wonder? Ohconfucius 02:05, 26 June 2010 (UTC)
  • Oh, the Little Less Heard will enjoy explaining the whole thing to you, especially Lady Catherine. Sure you deserve it! Bishonen | talk 02:54, 26 June 2010 (UTC).
    • I try not to explain my motivations, because I do not care to join the bewildered throng when it comes to understanding (or indeed caring) why I do the things I do. I should suggest that I did what I did because I could - and it amused me to do so. LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:10, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Spanko!

Re "Pushing bad taste"? You should go for FAC" – is Featured article candidates/Tarrare not scraping the bottom (sic) enough for you? I'd say Tom and his bum-whacking ways are positively mild in comparison. (I'm sure if they added this kind of thing to the curriculum, a lot more kids would pay attention to 18th century history lessons.) – iridescent 09:02, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Even more if they added handsome dinosaurs! Little cartoon join Bishzilla harem? Come cavort and disport in pocket! bishzilla _ROARR!! 18:32, 2 July 2010 (UTC).

Personally, I think "Oh Spanko" sound like the name of an amusing parlour game. I wish I could find someone to play it with me.  Giacomo  18:36, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps we could play it by email, a sort of "Postal Spanko"? Is "Rod to Buttocks4" a legal opening move? --RexxS (talk) 18:43, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

I suspect that may not be quite the riotous fun I had in mind.  Giacomo  18:44, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

No, but your version is probably only legal on the Cayman Islands. Bishonen | talk 19:03, 2 July 2010 (UTC).

Forget the spanko - This is far more scintillating!

My Dearest Mrs Bishonen,

One does hope you are recovered. However, I have a problem of some magnitude. My beloved nephew, that so very talented (and rather handsome boy) Giacomo, has exhumed a little known English literary fact, concerning the originality of one Bill Sikes here; apparently, a character in that deathly dull book Oliver Twist. I of course have never read a book by Dickens as I have a spirited, lively and intelligent mind, however, I know that you like to read such jottings. While dearest Giacomo does have some references for Dickens making his friend's (Dickens not Giacomo's) lover's husband the villainous Sikes, I am concerned, Giacomo's eagerness for "sexing up" each of his beautiful architectural pages, may eventually lay him low, by those lesser beings who try to trip him up on reference. You, knowing more than anyone on earth, about English literature will doubtless be able to find a better reference. Can't stop as I'm off to have a rubber with GBS , ATH and the Dowager Empress, I do hope she's not going to try and cheat again, such close and very dear friends. Toodle-pip. Lady Catherine de Burgh (the Late) (talk) 18:56, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Dear Lady C. That's scintillating in your opinion, huh? Apparently you don't expect a lot since your much-lamented demise. Sad, really... I agree with the irresistible Giano you that the reference in question falls a little short of WP:RS. I'll take a look in the library in a day or two—assuming that the oldfashioned "print book" still counts as an acceptable reference. My best regards to Attila the Hun and the rest of the aristocracy of blood and intellect who flock round your table. Á propos of GBS, I assume that despite your reactionary tendencies, you have improved the intelligence of your mind by studying his Intelligent Woman's Guide to Socialism ? Bishonen | talk 21:57, 5 July 2010 (UTC).

I especially recommend chapter IVX, the one subtitled A Preference for "Spooning"; That Neither Party Should Be On Top Or Below. I think Gerald B Smith really achieves Socialist perfection with that technique! LessHeard vanU (talk) 12:41, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

@LessHeard: Why don't you put your smutty remarks directly on Lady C's page where they will be appreciated, LittleHeard? Or, even better, on that of her sister, User:Princess Venetia di Cannoli ? Those sisters, as well as anybody in the Scrotum family, would be your perfect audience. Bishonen | talk 21:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC).

@Giacomo: Here's a better reference: "Daniel Maclise", web article by Nancy Weston, author of Daniel Maclise: Irish Artist in Victorian London (Dublin: Four Courts Press, 2001), 323 pp, ISBN 1-85182-574-6. That may be too much information, but how else are the Lesser Beings going to know Nancy Weston is a Reliable Source? Just pick out any bits you need. Bishonen | talk 21:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC).

@Lady C (the late): Thank you for you confidence in me. Don't be shy about mentioning that I know more than anyone on earth and in heaven about English literature. Bishonen | talk 21:23, 6 July 2010 (UTC).

I suggest, my good Bishonenesse, that smuttiness is in the eye of the beholder; indeed, I have heard of such photographic representations. Anyhoo, perhaps you are not as widely read as I was lead to believe and limit yourself to books that do not largely contain pictures. As for the Princess mentioned, I think I may have once ate her and although largely consummated by the experience found it a little too rich for frequent indulgence. I am uncertain about there needing to be an audience (or is that a term meaning an introduction?) for these matters and am considering retiring from this conversation. LessHeard vanU (talk) 21:52, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

Bishonenessesse to you, if you don't mind. Bishonen | talk 23:11, 6 July 2010 (UTC).

• What an amazing person you are, to have found that reference. Indeed I too have been busy, and here is the whole Sykes family painted by Maclise. I am just awondering what that object is he is carrying? No wonder she left him, poor woman, if he strutted around the house displaying something so horrendous and long as that all day long. One can only dread and wonder what Freud would have made of that not to mention Mr Les Van-Heard and his nasty smutty mind Lady Catherine de Burgh (the Late) (talk) 22:40, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

"Sometimes a lance is just a lance", perhaps? Bishonen | talk 23:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC).

• Well it must have been very dificult carrying something so long and protruding up and down that spiral staircase; that's all I can say. Most odd behaviour. Lady Catherine de Burgh (the Late) (talk) 12:46, 7 July 2010 (UTC)