Misplaced Pages

User talk:Rschen7754: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 19:06, 2 August 2010 editPreciseaccuracy (talk | contribs)556 edits →Admin/Noticeboard discussion that you closed: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 19:11, 2 August 2010 edit undoPreciseaccuracy (talk | contribs)556 edits →Admin/Noticeboard discussion that you closedNext edit →
Line 178: Line 178:
In fact, all of these sources unequivocally state that they were Israelis, and mention art students. This is clearly a deliberate lie. Huey has repeatedly misrepresented the content of sources. In fact, all of these sources unequivocally state that they were Israelis, and mention art students. This is clearly a deliberate lie. Huey has repeatedly misrepresented the content of sources.
] (]) 19:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC) ] (]) 19:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

What's even more troubling is that other users didn't challenge huey's statements and instead say that I shouldn't call huey45 a liar even though he is clearly acting in bad faith.] (]) 19:10, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:11, 2 August 2010

Please start new topics at the bottom of the page, even if it is related to a section above. Otherwise it is difficult to find the posting.

Do NOT use {{talkback}} or {{tb}} on this page. I am watching your talkpage and will notice if you have responded.

If you are here to complain about my speedy deletions, please read WP:CSD first before posting.

Notice: I will reply to your posts on this page to keep threading unless requested or unless it is extremely urgent.


SEMI-RETIRED


This user is no longer active on Misplaced Pages - but please see notes on userpage..
Misplaced Pages ad for Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Video games
Misplaced Pages adsfile info – show another – #192

User:Rschen7754/Wikistatus

This is Rschen7754's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments.
Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50Auto-archiving period: 2 months 



The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 31 May 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:39, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 7 June 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 12:19, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 14 June 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:12, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 21 June 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 19:28, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 28 June 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 22:00, 29 June 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 5 July 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:21, 6 July 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 12 July 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 21:22, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

New Zealand State Highway 8

The reason I'd the the browsee link for the next route to 1 on New Zealand State Highway 8 was because it was the last of the National routes according to Template:New Zealand State Highway navbox but if you think that 10 is a better link then I'll leave it at that. -- WOSlinker (talk) 08:03, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, 10 is better - it makes more sense to the reader not familiar with the NZ system, and allows the reader to navigate through all the articles. --Rschen7754 08:05, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 19 July 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 16:35, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

U.S. Routes

Shouldn't U.S. Route 45 be considered a major route? It crosses the entire country and is just as important as others endinag in 0 or 1. Also, U.S. Routes 75, 77, 81, 83, 85, 87, 89, 93, and 95 should all be considered major, as they either do or did cross the whole country. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian1291998 (talk • contribs) 17:36, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

No. Major routes as defined by AASHTO are only ones ending in 0 or 1, with possibly US 2. No exceptions. --Rschen7754 20:20, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Here's the deal, you're calling the second longest and formerly longest U.S. Route unimportant. U.S. Route 6 is an important route and you should know it. It provides a major corridor alternate to Interstate 80 and Interstate 90, but furthermore is a city road. It travels through the Salt Lake City area, Denver, Omaha, Des Moines, Davenport, Moline, Chicago, South Bend, and Erie. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Brian1291998 (talk • contribs) 23:58, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Take it to Template talk:U.S. Routes - we've decided to only highlight routes ending in 0 or 1, with US 2, and while you're welcome to try and get consensus for your changes, it probably won't happen. --Rschen7754 01:56, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 26 July 2010

Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 03:53, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

Geocoding

If you can't tell, I'm all for geocoding roads, but it is imperative that it be done correctly. I took my original thoughts from the other day and expanded how I think it should be done. Check out my sandbox on it to see what I'm talking about. –Fredddie™ 06:32, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

I think that would definitely be doable. --Rschen7754 06:36, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
I totally agree with you that every intersection should not be geocoded. Take I-5 for example. I don't think it would be unreasonable to find an intersection every 150 miles or so and tag it. It would draw a decent line that shows where it is without creating an obscene amount of dots on the GeoHack maps. –Fredddie™ 06:42, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Admin/Noticeboard discussion that you closed

On July 16th you closed this Admin Notice. The charges had not been addressed yet. Could you please address them.

http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=373860895&oldid=373860799

User Huey45 is acting in bad faith

Huey45 says…

“I called it "the fake Israeli thing" because all of the previous sources (yes, you're not the first person to mention this) suggested that the salesmen weren't even Israeli, let alone art students.”

In fact, all of these sources unequivocally state that they were Israelis, and mention art students. This is clearly a deliberate lie. Huey has repeatedly misrepresented the content of sources. Preciseaccuracy (talk) 19:06, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

What's even more troubling is that other users didn't challenge huey's statements and instead say that I shouldn't call huey45 a liar even though he is clearly acting in bad faith.Preciseaccuracy (talk) 19:10, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

User talk:Rschen7754: Difference between revisions Add topic