Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 21:34, 16 August 2010

User:Russavia/Top

Archives

Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III.

notes to self - nothing to see here

• User_talk:Ezhiki/2008#Hymn_of_the_RF
• User_talk:Ezhiki/2008#WP:RUSSIA_template
• User:Twp - slovar

The Misplaced Pages Signpost: 9 August 2010

• News and notes: FBI requests takedown of seal, Public Policy advisors and ambassadors, Cary Bass leaving, new Research Committee

• In the news: Wikinews interviews Umberto Eco, and more

• Admin stats: RfA drought worsens in 2010—wikigeneration gulf emerging

• Sister projects: Strategic Planning update

• WikiProject report: Chocks away for WikiProject Aviation

• Features and admins: The best of the week

• Arbitration report: Tricky and Lengthy Dispute Resolution

• Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News

I would like to get your opinion on sources on Russia

Hello, I want to ask you on your opinion about some articles on Russia that I think are maybe misleading on Russia's article - superpower vs. non superpower? I have about 93 articles from 2004 to current that are supporting Russa is a superpower, some are very good reading and some are short & simple. Yet one editor has made confusing edits on Russia's article as a questionable superpower. I would send you the articles but I wanted to know if you have an opinion on them or what like to view them for an opinion? Let me know and I will forward them over.--Globalstatus (talk) 23:48, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Your request

Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request#Paris Match article

Dear Russavia! In March 2009 you was on page above looking for an article in the Paris Match magazine. Is it still open or can it be archived? Cheers, Doc Taxon (talk) 05:13, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

• Misplaced Pages:WikiProject_Resource_Exchange/Resource_Request#An Occasional Paper

And this? Is it open, too? Please reply, Doc Taxon (talk) 05:31, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Hi Doc, the first request is still active yes, as it has a lot of info in it (apparently) which would be useful for the Slava Zaitsev article. The second request isn't mine, so I can't answer that one :) Cheers, --Russavia 18:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

I will see, what I can do to provide this article. Doc Taxon (talk) 18:06, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Russian Airplay Chart

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

• I think you're the one who needs a trout-slap for falsely accusing me of disruptive nomination. My concern here is the lack of notability. There's nothing online about these charts besides their own website. I've searched all over in both English and Russian. I strongly suggest you excise your false accusation from the AFD. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • 17:25, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

• Dear Russavia, it is not at all disruptive to nominate an article for deletion. Anyone can do that for any reason, good or bad. Repeated nominations one after another may be disruptive, but it was not in this case. At all. Please do not accuse editors in good standing of disruption. In fact you are likely guilty of disruption simply by making this accusation as now there is a new and disruptive discussion about it. I hope you take care. Basket of Puppies 17:40, 13 August 2010 (UTC)
  • When an editor takes another article to AfD in relation to another article that is at AfD, and which is still active, and when it can be construed that it is done to give their argument in the current AfD stronger weight, and when they obviously have not searched for any results (or actually presented any evidence of searches), and when they call it all a mess, and when it is obvious from a simple viewing of a couple of websites that this is a professional chart, and when there is no evidence of anyone else being asked (who may be in the know) for further information, then I do tend to regard such things as a tad disruptive. And that is all I have to say on the matter. --Russavia 18:01, 13 August 2010 (UTC)

Photos from Dakar

Hi there,

I was told about your list of required pictures and have uploaded the Russian embassy and consular house (as you will see, these aren't particularly notable buildings).

In any case, the files are here:

• File:Russian_embassy_in_Dakar.jpg and
• File:Russian consulate in Dakar.jpg

I leave the task of categorizing properly to you - you may also ask for them to be deleted if they don't suit your needs.

Cheers, Popo le Chien 20:15, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. Responded on your fr.wiki talk page. --Russavia 02:08, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Re

Thank you for informing me, but I removed your comment because it might be interpreted as a violation of interaction ban on your part (what you suggested me to do was not a legitimate dispute resolution, but a violation of ban). No complaints from me, however. You are very welcome to delete or rename whatever I did and keep me informed about this.Biophys (talk) 21:34, 16 August 2010 (UTC)