| Revision as of 07:14, 14 August 2010 editMandarax (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers388,559 editsm →Match Summary: Typo patrol, typos fixed: inthe → in the, excecuted → executed, oppurtunities → opportunities using AWB (6984)← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:41, 19 August 2010 edit undoBeeshoney (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers1,536 edits Requesting speedy deletion (CSD G1). (TW)Next edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| {{db-nonsense}} | |||
| {{Unreferenced|date=July 2010}} | {{Unreferenced|date=July 2010}} | ||
| {{Cleanup-rewrite|date=July 2010}} | {{Cleanup-rewrite|date=July 2010}} | ||
Revision as of 15:41, 19 August 2010
| This article may meet Misplaced Pages's criteria for speedy deletion as a page that is patent nonsense, consisting purely of incoherent text or gibberish with no meaningful content or history. This does not include poor writing, coherent vandalism and hoaxes (G3), coherent material not written in English, badly translated material, etc. This criterion also does not apply to pages in the user namespace. See CSD G1.%5B%5BWP%3ACSD%23G1%7CG1%5D%5D%3A+%5B%5BWP%3APN%7CPatent+nonsense%5D%5D%2C+meaningless%2C+or+incomprehensibleG1
If this article does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, or you intend to fix it, please remove this notice, but do not remove this notice from pages that you have created yourself. If you created this page and you disagree with the given reason for deletion, you can click the button below and leave a message explaining why you believe it should not be deleted. You can also visit the talk page to check if you have received a response to your message. Note that this article may be deleted at any time if it unquestionably meets the speedy deletion criteria, or if an explanation posted to the talk page is found to be insufficient.
Note to administrators: this article has content on its talk page which should be checked before deletion. Administrators: check links, talk, history (last), and logs before deletion. Consider checking Google.This page was last edited by Beeshoney (contribs | logs) at 15:41, 19 August 2010 (UTC) (14 years ago) |
 | This article does not cite any sources. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: "2009 WAFL Grand Final" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (July 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
 | This article may need to be rewritten to comply with Misplaced Pages's quality standards. You can help. The talk page may contain suggestions. (July 2010) |
 | The article's lead section may need to be rewritten. Please help improve the lead and read the lead layout guide. (July 2010) (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Build Up
Much curiosity from football fans preceded the contest. South Fremantle had finished on top of the ladder in season 2009, two games clear of Subiaco who had finished in second place. However Subiaco had won the previous three Premierships and this would be there fourth consecutive Grand Final appearance (and there sixth in seven years). Between them the two combatants had won every WAFL Premiership since 2004.
Match Summary
Early on South Fremantle had the bulk of the scoring opportunities, however of all these were not executed in effective manner, despite this the Bulldogs held a firm elevn point lead at the end of the first quarter.
Subiaco opened the second term in much better fashion and at one stage even looked like snatching the lead, South Fremantle steadied though to win the quarter and open a three goal lead by the main break.
Whatever chances the Lions had of getting back into the conteste were quickly dashed in the third quarter as South Fremantle ran rampant and opened up a match winning lead by the last change, with a resounding seven goal to two quarter.
The match was effectively over early in the final term, when the Bulldogs opened up a 53 point margin, save for a strong last ten minutes from Subiaco, South Fremantle had controlled virtually the entire match and deservedly went on to claim the flag.
| QT | HT | TQT | Final | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| South Fremantle | 5.3(33) | 8.8(56) | 15.10(100) | 17.11(113) |
| Subiaco | 3.4(22) | 5.8(38) | 7.11(53) | 13.17(95) |
Aftermath
The win ensured South Fremantle's thirteenth WAFL Premiership and ended Subiaco's Premiership winning streak.
Category: