| Revision as of 23:42, 4 September 2010 view sourceJusta Punk (talk | contribs)1,734 edits →Blocked← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:43, 4 September 2010 view source Justa Punk (talk | contribs)1,734 edits →Blocked: learn to spell, Punk!Next edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| :Can you please try to address the actual reasons for the block, in your unblock request? Ie demonstrate why unblocking this account would help improve Misplaced Pages? Otherwise, to appeal, you could ]. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">]]</span></small> 23:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | :Can you please try to address the actual reasons for the block, in your unblock request? Ie demonstrate why unblocking this account would help improve Misplaced Pages? Otherwise, to appeal, you could ]. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">]]</span></small> 23:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | ||
| :: I thought I did. Are you saying I'm not allowed to protect my user space just because I'm leaving once that's sorted? Basically what I have done is; | :: I thought I did. Are you saying I'm not allowed to protect my user space just because I'm leaving once that's sorted? Basically what I have done is; | ||
| ::# |
::# Solidified the SPA result that got my previous block (I'm not going to argue over ] because he's decided not to fight it because he was being penalised for using my computer) and took out NO sock templates on the user pages of identified socks. I call that a positive contribution that had no reason for reversion. | ||
| ::# Another reason for the block was a "blatant NPA violation". I took that on board and fixed it, directing it to content. I am entitled to my opinion aren't I? | ::# Another reason for the block was a "blatant NPA violation". I took that on board and fixed it, directing it to content. I am entitled to my opinion aren't I? | ||
Revision as of 23:43, 4 September 2010
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User:Justa Punk, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. GiftigerWunsch 22:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
I have blocked your account indefinitely, as it seems clear that you have no intention of constructively helping to build an encyclopedia. You may appeal this block by placing the template {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Hersfold 23:16, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
{{unblock|I have the right to protect my user space under WP:UP. There is no rule that says I can't redirect my talk page to my user page. I have already removed any personal attack from the template on my user page and I expect to be able to defend myself from return attacks until such time as they are sorted. This is not disruptive editing as I have not done any article editing and don't intend to. This account will be retired once people leave my user space alone. Oh, and calling the SITE Xenophobic is an attack on the content.}}
- Can you please try to address the actual reasons for the block, in your unblock request? Ie demonstrate why unblocking this account would help improve Misplaced Pages? Otherwise, to appeal, you could send an email. Thanks, Chzz ► 23:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- I thought I did. Are you saying I'm not allowed to protect my user space just because I'm leaving once that's sorted? Basically what I have done is;
- Solidified the SPA result that got my previous block (I'm not going to argue over User:Mal Case because he's decided not to fight it because he was being penalised for using my computer) and took out NO sock templates on the user pages of identified socks. I call that a positive contribution that had no reason for reversion.
- Another reason for the block was a "blatant NPA violation". I took that on board and fixed it, directing it to content. I am entitled to my opinion aren't I?
- I thought I did. Are you saying I'm not allowed to protect my user space just because I'm leaving once that's sorted? Basically what I have done is;
- Let's discuss this instead of jumping to conclusions. !! Justa Punk !! 23:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- Being as he doesn't intend to do any editing, I don't see any point in unblocking. This is what we call a self-solving problem: he's 'quitting', so why does he need an unblock? If anything, this should prevent the creation of 'like-thinking individuals' if you catch my drift. HalfShadow 23:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- I've explained why the unblock should occur. !! Justa Punk !! 23:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)