| Revision as of 02:31, 14 October 2010 editMoabdave (talk | contribs)Edit filter managers, Administrators12,664 edits →Mind giving an article a review?: thx← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:46, 21 October 2010 edit undoThelmadatter (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,943 edits →scorpian mezcal???????: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
| :Yeah I'll see what I can do for it. I'm so tired right now I can't even muster up small talk... so I will see you later! --<span style="font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black">]•]•]</span> 00:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC) | :Yeah I'll see what I can do for it. I'm so tired right now I can't even muster up small talk... so I will see you later! --<span style="font-family:Verdana;border:1px dotted black">]•]•]</span> 00:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| ::Thanks. There's no hurry. Get some rest! ] (]) 02:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC) | ::Thanks. There's no hurry. Get some rest! ] (]) 02:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC) | ||
| == scorpian mezcal??????? == | |||
| uuuuuuuu iiiiiiii!... scary] (]) 01:46, 21 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 01:46, 21 October 2010
 | If you leave me a message, I will respond here so please:
|
Template:Archive box collapsible
Thanks
Thanks for all your hard work on the Federal Bridge Gross Weight Formula. It is a random, but interesting topic. Remember (talk) 13:29, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
- Congratulations - I remember this one from peer review, great to see it on the Main Page! Ruhrfisch ><>° 17:07, 16 April 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Misplaced Pages:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Karanacs (talk) 17:28, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Mind giving an article a review?
Ergosum, How's life? Long time no talk. When you have some time, could you review Thistle, Utah? I honestly thought I had everything worked out, but it failed FAC with 1 oppose vote for "needs a copyedit". Which is fair, I'm the first to admit I'm a sloppy writer. Anyways, the FAC is over and done with, so no rush. I was just hoping to get some extra eyes so I could re-submit in a few months.
Thanks much Dave (talk) 20:23, 10 October 2010 (UTC)
- Yeah I'll see what I can do for it. I'm so tired right now I can't even muster up small talk... so I will see you later! --ErgoSum•talk•trib 00:06, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks. There's no hurry. Get some rest! Dave (talk) 02:31, 14 October 2010 (UTC)
scorpian mezcal???????
uuuuuuuu iiiiiiii!... scaryThelmadatter (talk) 01:46, 21 October 2010 (UTC)