| Revision as of 23:11, 7 November 2010 view sourcePrinceJP (talk | contribs)4 edits cleared per WP:UP on behalf of blocked account← Previous edit | Revision as of 06:34, 8 November 2010 view source MuZemike (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users71,098 editsm Reverted edits by PrinceJP (talk) to last version by ChaserNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ] This is the '''only warning''' you will receive regarding your disruptive comments. <br> The next time you make a ] as you did at ], you may be '''] without further notice'''. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. <!-- Template:uw-npa4im --> <span id="sig" style="background:#FFFFC0">''']''' </font>]]</span> 22:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Blocked == | |||
| I have blocked your account indefinitely, as it seems clear that you have no intention of constructively helping to build an encyclopedia. You may appeal this block by placing the template {{tlx|unblock|your reason here}} <!-- without tlx| --> below. ] <sup>(]/]/])</sup> 23:16, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| {{unblock reviewed|1=I have the right to protect my user space under ]. There is no rule that says I can't redirect my talk page to my user page. I have already removed any personal attack from the template on my user page and I expect to be able to defend myself from return attacks until such time as they are sorted. This is not disruptive editing as I have not done any article editing and don't intend to. This account will be retired once people leave my user space alone. Oh, and calling the SITE Xenophobic is an attack on the content. Basically what I have done is; # Solidified the SPA result that got my previous block (I'm not going to argue over ] because he's decided not to fight it because he was being penalised for using my computer) and took out NO sock templates on the user pages of identified socks. I call that a positive contribution that had no reason for reversion. # Another reason for the block was a "blatant NPA violation". I took that on board and fixed it, directing it to content. I am entitled to my opinion aren't I?|decline=Seeing as how you're leaving Misplaced Pages, your need to use your userpages is at an end. Misplaced Pages has user and user talk pages for the advancement of the project, not for soapboxing or to help you insult the project as you make your exit.--] (]) 00:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)}} | |||
| :Can you please try to address the actual reasons for the block, in your unblock request? Ie demonstrate why unblocking this account would help improve Misplaced Pages? Otherwise, to appeal, you could ]. Thanks, <small><span style="border:1px solid;background:#00008B">]]</span></small> 23:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :: I thought I did. Are you saying I'm not allowed to protect my user space just because I'm leaving once that's sorted? (moved rest to unblock request) | |||
| ::Let's discuss this instead of jumping to conclusions. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 23:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::*Being as he doesn't intend to do any editing, I don't see any point in unblocking. This is what we call a self-solving problem: he's 'quitting', so why does he need an unblock? If anything, this should prevent the creation of 'like-thinking individuals' if you catch my drift. ]] 23:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::: I've explained why the unblock should occur. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 23:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::: Oh and that comment was rude. <span style="border: 2px green solid;background-color:#FFFF99">'''''<font color="blue">!!</font> ]<font color="red">a</font> ] <font color="blue">!!</font>'''''</span> 23:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 06:34, 8 November 2010
This is the only warning you will receive regarding your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User:Justa Punk, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. GiftigerWunsch 22:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Blocked
I have blocked your account indefinitely, as it seems clear that you have no intention of constructively helping to build an encyclopedia. You may appeal this block by placing the template {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Hersfold 23:16, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
Justa Punk (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I have the right to protect my user space under WP:UP. There is no rule that says I can't redirect my talk page to my user page. I have already removed any personal attack from the template on my user page and I expect to be able to defend myself from return attacks until such time as they are sorted. This is not disruptive editing as I have not done any article editing and don't intend to. This account will be retired once people leave my user space alone. Oh, and calling the SITE Xenophobic is an attack on the content. Basically what I have done is; # Solidified the SPA result that got my previous block (I'm not going to argue over User:Mal Case because he's decided not to fight it because he was being penalised for using my computer) and took out NO sock templates on the user pages of identified socks. I call that a positive contribution that had no reason for reversion. # Another reason for the block was a "blatant NPA violation". I took that on board and fixed it, directing it to content. I am entitled to my opinion aren't I?
Decline reason:
Seeing as how you're leaving Misplaced Pages, your need to use your userpages is at an end. Misplaced Pages has user and user talk pages for the advancement of the project, not for soapboxing or to help you insult the project as you make your exit.--Chaser (talk) 00:40, 5 September 2010 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Can you please try to address the actual reasons for the block, in your unblock request? Ie demonstrate why unblocking this account would help improve Misplaced Pages? Otherwise, to appeal, you could send an email. Thanks, Chzz ► 23:34, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- I thought I did. Are you saying I'm not allowed to protect my user space just because I'm leaving once that's sorted? (moved rest to unblock request)
- Let's discuss this instead of jumping to conclusions. !! Justa Punk !! 23:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- Being as he doesn't intend to do any editing, I don't see any point in unblocking. This is what we call a self-solving problem: he's 'quitting', so why does he need an unblock? If anything, this should prevent the creation of 'like-thinking individuals' if you catch my drift. HalfShadow 23:38, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- I've explained why the unblock should occur. !! Justa Punk !! 23:41, 4 September 2010 (UTC)
- Oh and that comment was rude. !! Justa Punk !! 23:46, 4 September 2010 (UTC)