| Revision as of 23:10, 4 November 2010 editSupertouch (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers16,288 edits Moved comments to article talk page← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:17, 9 November 2010 edit undoSupertouch (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers16,288 edits ←Blanked the pageNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == Re: == | |||
| I restored sources that had been removed, but I failed to realize that someone had some new sources in-between the edits. That said, it's funny how you supposedly watch ] for every edit, yet you did not notice an earlier blatant vandalism by an anon . What do we call this? Selective amnesia? ] (]) 06:57, 11 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Abu Bakr == | |||
| Dear friend, | |||
| Please have a look at the article ], and on its last couple of edits. Someone is trying to make the article reflect shia view more than sunni view and is removing any comment citing neutral or sunni reference. Thanks.] (]) 05:43, 13 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | |||
| Hi Supertouch. You previously renamed the above article. The name of the article is being discussed ] as I felt that that was outside the article's scope. Your input is kindly requested. Thanks. ] (]) 22:16, 20 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| == Defender of the Wiki Barnstar == | |||
| {| style="border: 1px solid gray; background-color: #fdffe7;" | |||
| |rowspan="2" valign="middle" | ] | |||
| |rowspan="2" | | |||
| |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em;" | '''The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar''' | |||
| |- | |||
| |style="vertical-align: middle; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | I award you this barnstar for reverting , a major copyright violation. ]] 08:05, 24 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| |} | |||
| {{talkback|CharlieEchoTango}} | |||
| == Everyone on vacation, perhaps? == | |||
| Hi S -- has nobody seen fit to start an article on the Yemen-Chicago cargo bombing attempt? I would have thought we would have had one up by now, but cannot seem to find one. Best.--] (]) 06:15, 31 October 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :Out of curiosity, would you happen to know whether AA referenced either of the addressee "historical figures" mentioned in his tapes or writings? Just wondering ...--] (]) 06:23, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::I never listened to AA, but would not at all be surprised if he did mention something of that nature. In general, low-level proselytizers, such as AA, are not very original or well informed in the facts they cite in their speeches and simply parrot what a higher level person has said. ] (]) | |||
| :::Tx.--] (]) 15:48, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Considering that this article has only a single line of text in the main body, was there really a point to adding a inline cites needed template? If you want to be consistent, please go through my recent contributions and add it to all the other stubs that I've built in the last day or two.--] (]) 20:25, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :I did that because there was a "reference improve" template on the page which was inappropriate as the page had a number of references. Replacing that original template with another to remind the editor who began the page is hardly offensive. ] (]) 20:36, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::It wasn't offensive at all, but just seemed pointless. Considering I'd just created the article a few hours ago I'm surprised that anybody bothered to do anything like that at all. I hadn't noticed that any other notices were placed on the article; I'll have to check out the history and see who did that in the first place and why.--] (]) 20:42, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| :::It was added in this edit: by ] who is a relatively new editor. ] (]) 20:47, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||
| ::::Yeah, I've dropped him a line advising him to be more careful and to wait a bit longer before tagging new articles.--] (]) 20:49, 3 November 2010 (UTC) | |||