Revision as of 20:43, 14 February 2006 editTrosk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users564 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:43, 14 February 2006 edit undoTrosk (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users564 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
==Title== | ==Title== | ||
Is there a reason "roster" isn't capitalized on the title of the page? Same thing with the previous roster. | Is there a reason "roster" isn't capitalized on the title of the page? Same thing with the previous roster. ] 20:43, 14 February 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:43, 14 February 2006
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the List of WWE personnel article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 |
Professional wrestling Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
"Red links"
I'd previously removed some of the wikilinks to articles that don't exist. While red links may encourage articles to be written, the thing is, just because someone works for WWE in some capacity doesn't mean we want to encourage articles to be written about that person. --Jtalledo (talk) 23:11, 9 October 2005 (UTC)
Two Comments about WWE Current Superstar Page I Have
I suggest instead of putting Jim Ross under Inactive, should not he be under the administration with the title: Executive Vice President, Business Strategies with a mention to his firing in kayfabe?
Furthermore, Would it be more logic to list the Commentators, Backstage Announcers, Ring Announcers, & GM under there specific Brand or would it be to messy --BionicWilliam 18:56, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- There aren't too many Commenators and such so leaving them with their own sections is better than splitting them up into brands. --Jtalledo (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
Then aleast we should put what brand there affilated with. My reasoning is say a noobie to wrestling came on here and wanted to know who the GM's it would look like that both Bischoff & Long were Co GMs? BionicWilliam 19:46, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
- I marked up some of the commentators and such with their respective brands. Good idea. --Jtalledo (talk) 23:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)
Little note, edited some of the "Inactive" lists. Dupree has a hernia that's got infected, Helms recently returned on Unlimited and Striker's been doing more stuff recently. 212.56.102.74 20:30, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Alphabetizing issues
I see that wrestlers with normal names are alphabetized by last name but people like Super Crazy are as well. For wrestlers like Super Crazy and Super Porky, wouldn't it make more sense to just use the first letter of their name since it's not like we are supposed to believe that Mr. and Mrs. Crazy had a little boy and decided to call him "Super." --Darren Jowalsen 22:14, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
- True. These kinds of entries should be alphabetized by the first letters of their stage names. --Jtalledo (talk) 22:47, 23 October 2005 (UTC)
I suggest we all the workers in order by the first letter of there stage name as on WWE’s Superstar page but not by articals like for example: Undertaker besides The Undetaker, Rock besides the Rock That would get rid of part-time wrestlers and managers/divas but it would also stop reverting wars that has been going on. BionicWilliam 19:49, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
The current alphabetical order listing is fine; no reason to change it. SWD316 23:15, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
About OVW & DSW Roster’s in general
I would suggest we should split their rosters up into development and the exclusive rosters. Seeing as it is hard to believe every one of those stars under those lists are under WWE Superstar or WWE Developmental Superstar Contracts. BionicWilliam 19:49, 6 November 2005 (UTC)
All the people listed here do have developmental contracts, there's no reason to seperate them. SWD316 23:15, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Actually, not all the wrestlers in OVW and DSW have developmental contracts. Since this page is a WWE roster page, I feel only those in OVW and DSW with WWE contracts should be listed. James
WWE Superstars sent to OVW & DSW
Shouldn't the Raw and SmackDown Superstars that were sent to OVW and DSW be on those lists and not the "inactive roster" list? I don't see how they are "inactive". --Wwfanz 00:26, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
He is inactive!
I put Danny basham on the inactive list because on his page he said he had not wresteled since september THATS INACTIVE! But someone took him off the list. take a look at his profile for yourself! DINOMAN 18.25 3 January 2006 (GMT)
- That's not true. Recently, December 18, he competed against Ken Doane at a RAW brand house show. He is active as far as we know. The Misplaced Pages article about him is out dated. SWD316 02:11, 4 January 2006 (UTC)
parisi and dupree
Johnny parisi and rene dupree currently wrestle for OVW and DSW (according to their profiles) so take them of the inactive list and put them on OVW and DSW roster. DINOMAN 20:13, 4 January 2006 (UTC) (UCT) 20:12 JANUARY 4TH
Inactive list
I moved Striker and Kash back too their respective rosters. Striker is still appearing on TV (HEAT) and while even though Kash is injured, he hasn't yet missed ring time. I remember we had this same issue with Edge and Batista about a month ago. Anon. User, 8 January, 2006.
Title
Is there a reason "roster" isn't capitalized on the title of the page? Same thing with the previous roster. Trosk 20:43, 14 February 2006 (UTC)
Categories: