| Revision as of 22:58, 13 February 2006 editPierremenard (talk | contribs)1,093 edits redirect← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:21, 15 February 2006 edit undoJohnleemk (talk | contribs)Administrators20,736 edits Closing debate; result was redirectNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| <div class="boilerplate metadata vfd" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |||
| :''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. '' | |||
| <!-- | |||
| Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. --> | |||
| The result of the debate was '''redirect'''. ] | ] 15:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC) | |||
| ===] (second nom)=== | ===] (second nom)=== | ||
| ]. Failed to meet concensus, but the clear requirement was for it to be expanded. Many doubted that it could be expanded, and indeed the article has hardly been touched since then. I believe it's beyond redemption. '''Delete'''. | ]. Failed to meet concensus, but the clear requirement was for it to be expanded. Many doubted that it could be expanded, and indeed the article has hardly been touched since then. I believe it's beyond redemption. '''Delete'''. | ||
| Line 15: | Line 22: | ||
| *'''Redirect or delete'''. ] 13:31, 9 February 2006 (UTC) | *'''Redirect or delete'''. ] 13:31, 9 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Redirect''' -- ] 22:58, 13 February 2006 (UTC) | *'''Redirect''' -- ] 22:58, 13 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| :''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.</div> | |||
Revision as of 15:21, 15 February 2006
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was redirect. Johnleemk | Talk 15:21, 15 February 2006 (UTC)
Daddy’s girl (second nom)
Previously nominated. Failed to meet concensus, but the clear requirement was for it to be expanded. Many doubted that it could be expanded, and indeed the article has hardly been touched since then. I believe it's beyond redemption. Delete.
I apologise for relisting so soon, but the closing admin encouraged such action if the article showed no signs of useful expansion. --kingboyk 07:17, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom unless someone can come up with a better use for this article. --Kinu 18:12, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete dicdef Ergot 18:30, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
Deleteper pointless article... dicdef that seems to be a vehicle for a linkback to a Tekken character.--Isotope23 18:49, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect per Ruby.--Isotope23 21:35, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Elektra complex Ruby 19:59, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Elektra complex - UtherSRG (talk) 20:58, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Elektra complex. Reasonable search term. --Allen 22:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, dicdef. Elektra complex is an inappropriate redirect, as it implies a completely different power-relation between father and daughter. Ziggurat 23:46, 8 February 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as dicdef - for once, I'm going to have say that a redirect is not appropriate, per Ziggurat. Redirecting to Electra complex would cause confusion and mislead anyone searching for the term "daddy's girl". -- Jonel | Speak 02:38, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect to Elektra complex.--み使い Mitsukai 06:29, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect or delete. Stifle 13:31, 9 February 2006 (UTC)
- Redirect -- Pierremenard 22:58, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.