| Revision as of 14:40, 12 January 2011 editIridescent (talk | contribs)Administrators402,683 edits →Julian of Norwich....: belated reply← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:07, 13 January 2011 edit undoMiszaBot III (talk | contribs)597,462 editsm Archiving 1 thread(s) (older than 7d) to User talk:Iridescent/Archive 15.Next edit → | ||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| :: No worries. The books will still be at the uni library when you're done with arbcom ... ] - ] 20:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | :: No worries. The books will still be at the uni library when you're done with arbcom ... ] - ] 20:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| :::I do want to do more on Norwich in general at some point—for various reasons, Norfolk is poorly covered on Misplaced Pages despite its significance—but there'll probably be quite a long delay. I still need to finish the Metropolitan Railway series, which is likely to take a long time. At some point I also want to do justice to ]; the current stubby article doesn't do justice to what is one of the oddest places I've ever been. (Russian Orthodox monks venerating the Anglo-Saxon nobility? A graveyard with its own railway system for shifting corpses? The empty tomb of Dodi Al-Fayed, from which he's since been exhumed? Yup, all present and correct.) – ] 14:40, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | :::I do want to do more on Norwich in general at some point—for various reasons, Norfolk is poorly covered on Misplaced Pages despite its significance—but there'll probably be quite a long delay. I still need to finish the Metropolitan Railway series, which is likely to take a long time. At some point I also want to do justice to ]; the current stubby article doesn't do justice to what is one of the oddest places I've ever been. (Russian Orthodox monks venerating the Anglo-Saxon nobility? A graveyard with its own railway system for shifting corpses? The empty tomb of Dodi Al-Fayed, from which he's since been exhumed? Yup, all present and correct.) – ] 14:40, 12 January 2011 (UTC) | ||
| == January Metro == | |||
| {{Misplaced Pages:WikiProject London Transport/The Metropolitan/Issue 30}} | |||
| Please also see ]. ] (]) and their ] 23:19, 5 January 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:07, 13 January 2011
| Archives |
Julian of Norwich....
Was it you, Iri, that was interested in Julian? I can't remember anymore... if you are, I've turned up some possible book sources... Ealdgyth - Talk 00:48, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- It was, but it's something I'm unlikely to return to for the foreseeable. At the moment I'm taking a piece of sensible advice, and cutting back everything I do here to the bare minimum of maintenance, until I can assess how much time this Arbcom business is going to consume. (To put things in perspective, I just returned after a four day absence to find 292 mails in my inbox, and that's despite none of the usual suspects knowing my new email address yet.) Besides, "controversial religious figure" and "Misplaced Pages" don't mix well. – iridescent 19:55, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- No worries. The books will still be at the uni library when you're done with arbcom ... Ealdgyth - Talk 20:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC)
- I do want to do more on Norwich in general at some point—for various reasons, Norfolk is poorly covered on Misplaced Pages despite its significance—but there'll probably be quite a long delay. I still need to finish the Metropolitan Railway series, which is likely to take a long time. At some point I also want to do justice to Brookwood Cemetery; the current stubby article doesn't do justice to what is one of the oddest places I've ever been. (Russian Orthodox monks venerating the Anglo-Saxon nobility? A graveyard with its own railway system for shifting corpses? The empty tomb of Dodi Al-Fayed, from which he's since been exhumed? Yup, all present and correct.) – iridescent 14:40, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
- No worries. The books will still be at the uni library when you're done with arbcom ... Ealdgyth - Talk 20:00, 4 January 2011 (UTC)