Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 22:46, 26 February 2006

Thank you for your contributions to Misplaced Pages. As a member of the Misplaced Pages community, I would like to remind you of Misplaced Pages's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. You may also be interested in reading The five pillars of Misplaced Pages, our Help pages, the Tutorial, the policy on citing sources, and our Manual of Style.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (] (]) 03:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Misplaced Pages:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

-- ran (talk) 03:55, 21 February 2006 (UTC)

3rr warning over Inner Mongolia

Hi. Please be careful over excessive reverts, which can get you blocked. Please read WP:3RR carefully; you might want to look at WP:1RR and WP:NPOV too. Regards, William M. Connolley 12:04, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Tell me what is better ways to stop the other guys from keep deleting (and of course reverting too) every change I made and to keep their own.

Make some common sense before warning me, OK?

dugar 19:45, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Please do not make personal attacks on other people. Misplaced Pages has a policy against personal attacks. In some cases, users who engage in personal attacks may be blocked from editing by admins or banned by the arbitration committee. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Please resolve disputes appropriately. Thank you. Mark 17:30, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

What do you mean "personal attack"? Why don't site what my "personal attack" is? dugar 22:09, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

'Racist' and 'arrogant'. Mark 22:24, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Hey this is nonsense. What about the people who're acting out of racism and arrogance? Why don't you block them? What about them never letting me do any edits?

dugar 22:31, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

I've blocked you for 24 hours for your continued persional atacks on Talk:Inner Mongolia. Please contribute civilly on your return. Thanks, Mark 21:40, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

That being said, I'll respond here to the remarks Mark reverted. You're right: I didn't pour through the other fellow's remarks in their entirety. My point isn't in whether or not he's right. It's that his history lesson isn't pertinent. What we're seeing is a longwinded history lesson as to why this territory should be called "Southern Mongolia" in English, but the fact of the matter is that it isn't. Since Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia, not a public debating forum, not a site for neologisms, not a public advocacy forum, we have no business here declaring long-standing usages invalid or inaccurate. Convince the rest of the world to call it "Southern Mongolia" first -- and try to do it with fewer obscenities this time -- and it'll be legitimate to change things here. Not before. RGTraynor 22:03, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

you know you're really messed up. dugar 22:06, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

"American mouths are way too faster than American brain"? You've already been blocked before for personal attacks but I don't think you've quite gotten the point yet. Please take a closer look at our policies. -- ran (talk) 21:17, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

It's amazing that while you ignore my invitation for discussion in more than one place, you're so quick to block me and fan the fires of other. I don't think you're in good faith to do anything but to spread your Chinese chauvinistic fantasy. dugar 21:58, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Please note that POV-pushing, false accusations, personal attacks, and bigoted comments such as "American mouths are way too faster than American brain" are not constructive "invitations for discussion" in Misplaced Pages. -- ran (talk) 22:15, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Amazing! Why would you ignore my invitations posted, even one right on your talk page, long before, all these negative developments? Yes, I admit that I wasn't always acting polite and perfect. I'm not very familiar with all precedures, policies and editing techniques of[REDACTED] and I still am not. But that said, why would you, as an admin, have to till the dispute being escalated to the current degree and/or waiting for me to prompted again and again till I act in the degree for which you blocked and just in order to be able to block me? Isn't all you have done so far, is just keep reverting whatever changes I made? Have you read my comments on your user page and my "initial thoughts" and the willingness expressed about working together to modify the disputed article? Have you responded to them? Why not? Why were you then so quick and so enthusiastic about just blocking me? Do you want me to apologize? I can definitely do that if you'd stop acting biased and abusing your power. dugar 22:37, 26 February 2006 (UTC)