Misplaced Pages

User talk:Aarem: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 14:01, 8 March 2011 editEdwardsBot (talk | contribs)354,693 edits →The Signpost: 7 March 2011: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 16:26, 8 March 2011 edit undoSamaleks (talk | contribs)825 edits →ALLEGATION OF IP EDIT WARS/SOCK ETC - MARCH 2011Next edit →
Line 121: Line 121:
Why you avoid lower4th and Binoy in block request to admin? Or are you little biased on tvm? --] (]) 10:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC) Why you avoid lower4th and Binoy in block request to admin? Or are you little biased on tvm? --] (]) 10:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
:: Ha Ha.. I reported only those editors who got involved in the current revisions (airport related). The said two users were not involved in this current edit-war. Hence, I did not mention them. Anyways, if they are also involved using anonymous IPs, it could be easily tracked down by the investigating Admin. So, be cool :-) --] ] 12:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC) :: Ha Ha.. I reported only those editors who got involved in the current revisions (airport related). The said two users were not involved in this current edit-war. Hence, I did not mention them. Anyways, if they are also involved using anonymous IPs, it could be easily tracked down by the investigating Admin. So, be cool :-) --] ] 12:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

It is not me, but the users with Di lep KS as the leader, is doing the edit-warring. Mantanwhiskey is the arrogant chap in their team, and Biju kuttan is the ignorant chap. DileepKS (KS seems to be an interesting acronym :-D ) is triggering all these planned edit-wars from behind the curtain. He wants to try to push his POV which is STRONGLY in favor of KOCHI and AGAINST TRIVANDRUM. Hence, he is trying to remove facts (those are holding valid citations). --] (]) 16:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


==Trivandrum Central== ==Trivandrum Central==

Revision as of 16:26, 8 March 2011

Click here for posting a message
Click here to email me.

If you leave me a message, I will respond here and will let you know on your talk page using the {{Talkback}} template.

Template:Archive box collapsible



Nomination of Kinfra Apparel Park for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Kinfra Apparel Park, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Misplaced Pages policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Kinfra Apparel Park until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 13:57, 28 November 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for notifying. I have made my comments in the deletion logs. Cheers, -- Aarem 04:12, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

José Paranhos, Viscount of Rio Branco is now a FAC

Hi, I am the same editor who wrote Pedro II of Brazil and I've nominated another article, José Paranhos, Viscount of Rio Branco, as a FAC. It is about a 19th century Brazilian statesman and is closely related to Pedro II's life. If you enjoyed the Emperor's article I believe you might enjoy this one. Thus, I'd like to see your opinion on whether you would support or oppose its nomination. The link: Misplaced Pages:Featured article candidates/José Paranhos, Viscount of Rio Branco/archive1 --Lecen (talk) 12:38, 24 November 2010 (UTC)

I will review the page. Cheers, -- Aarem 04:14, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kerala uty logo3.JPG

⚠
⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kerala uty logo3.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Misplaced Pages under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Misplaced Pages. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Misplaced Pages (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Misplaced Pages page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Courcelles 03:53, 16 January 2011 (UTC)

Who are you??

Who are you??? Boolyme 10:38, 28 January 2011 (UTC)


created a page

I have created this page http://en.wikipedia.org/Nalacharitham. Which you had previously redirected to Damayanti. This is my first page and first contribution to wikipedia. Please let me know your comments/feedbacks.

thanks. Profpcm (talk) 20:16, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Reply to message on my tallk page

Aarem, I would be glad to correspond with you by e-mail. I couldn't find your email id either. Please use dileepks on the gmail service to reach me.

Unless you want to continue the discussion on talk pages, please delete the message on my talk page.

DileepKS(talk) 09:53, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

DileepKS, You can mail me by clicking the link with text "Click here to email me" on top of my Talk page. -- Aarem 04:43, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Aarem, I get an error message when I clicked the link.


Jump to: navigation, search
This user has not specified a valid e-mail address.
Return to Main Page

Please add your e-mail, or better, email me.

DileepKS(talk) 06:15, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Hello, Aarem. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

The Signpost: 28 February 2011

 Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 00:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Your intervention needed on edit war

Aarem, you are a senior editor, and someone very much involved with the TVM page. Could you please intervene and do something to control the out of control editors?

Yourself, Binoy and LowerFourth have conceded that the Hindu report is inadmissible as ref. Now, war is going on with id and ips, and users are trying to fillibuster the edit. I moved WP:RFC, and am staying off till that is resolved. But people are not taking the RFC process in good faith, and continuing the war. I believe if you intervene, it would stop, since you could not be accused of bias.

DileepKS(talk) 05:50, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Dileep, I have made an edit-warring report. My intervention at this point may not help; as there are lot of anon IPs involved. Hence, I am staying out of the mess. The page will be semi-protected soon, which will not allow non-registered users to edit. Cheers, -- Aarem 06:38, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

You forgot to report Induzcreed and Sudheesh s, who actually started the war after we reached consensus. I believe the IPs belong to them. Could you add those editors as well to your report please?

A semi-protection is good option. Still, the core issue remains, which is some editors filibustering the discussion despite clear evidence. I still believe, after the semi-protect, you could intervene and end the issue. I don't think any of the editors will question your call.

DileepKS(talk) 06:50, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

I have included Induzcreed also. Sudheesh s is a new user, and I believe his IP is 49.14.77.249. Anyways, if he is also involved, that could be tracked. If the article is semi-protected, both un-registered users and new users cannot edit the page. -- Aarem 06:56, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

ALLEGATION OF IP EDIT WARS/SOCK ETC - MARCH 2011

With Reference to your Allegation and Request to BLOCK me and several others on the Admin Page - Let me clarify that I have not used any other ID or IP to participate in the alleged EDIT war on the Thiruvanathapuram page. In fact I was one of the first people to alert User:Toddst1 about the EDIT wars. It is true that there is a difference of opinion but we have all talked openly on the TALK pages and I do not see the need to involve in an anonymous EDIT WAR as you have made it out to be. I think I have learned enough here (the rules) to not involve myself in an anonymous IP edit war. Anyways, let us leave it to the admins to figure out who did what. I hope they have the time and energy to go through the several IPs and what belongs to whom! Cheers and wonder why you do not pop up on the pages especially being a senior editor! :-) - MountainWhiskey (talk) 06:14, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Surprising to know that you are tracking my contributions all the time :-)
I did not tell that it was your sock IPs. I just made a report on the ongoing war, and listed down all the editors who were involved in the topic under dispute. The nature of revisions from all the users and IPs were the same. It is not against you; and it will help you in a positive way, if you are not involved in those frequent revisions. So, please do not take that as an allegation against you.
I am not interested to waste my time in juvenile fights, and that is the reason of not poping up there. -- Aarem 06:29, 8 March 2011 (UTC)


Thanks for the reply, Aarem. No, I am not tracking your contributions :-). But I was checking if you were IDLE coz your intervention is desperately needed on the TRV page. It was in this context that I saw your post on the Admin page. Interestingly, User: Samaleks has made the same allegation against me and others. I must admit I am involved in the discussion and I have only made my opinions and not involved in a war, especially the one that is currently going on. I have made my POV and now there are several people out there who do not believe in the POVs made in the discussions and of course the others who believe in the POVs and they are at war. Ugly and could cause the page to be blocked. I have also put up a request on Toddst's page. Let us see what comes of it. - MountainWhiskey (talk) 06:42, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Why you avoid lower4th and Binoy in block request to admin? Or are you little biased on tvm? --Bijuts (talk) 10:46, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Ha Ha.. I reported only those editors who got involved in the current revisions (airport related). The said two users were not involved in this current edit-war. Hence, I did not mention them. Anyways, if they are also involved using anonymous IPs, it could be easily tracked down by the investigating Admin. So, be cool :-) -- Aarem 12:24, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

It is not me, but the users with Di lep KS as the leader, is doing the edit-warring. Mantanwhiskey is the arrogant chap in their team, and Biju kuttan is the ignorant chap. DileepKS (KS seems to be an interesting acronym :-D ) is triggering all these planned edit-wars from behind the curtain. He wants to try to push his POV which is STRONGLY in favor of KOCHI and AGAINST TRIVANDRUM. Hence, he is trying to remove facts (those are holding valid citations). --Samaleks (talk) 16:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Trivandrum Central

Dear Aarem,

I respect you as a senior editor. I just meant to share, Please dont treat my messages othewise. --Bijuts (talk) 09:31, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

Thank you :-) I am always willing to help. -- Aarem 12:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 7 March 2011

 Read this Signpost in full · Single-page · Unsubscribe · EdwardsBot (talk) 14:01, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

User talk:Aarem: Difference between revisions Add topic