Misplaced Pages

:Featured picture candidates/raspberries: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:10, 3 March 2006 editChowells (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,196 edits []: sup← Previous edit Revision as of 17:11, 3 March 2006 edit undoGracenotes (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers18,359 edits []Next edit →
Line 26: Line 26:
*'''Support''' original, the darker ones look over-ripe. --<font color="#FF0000">]</font>] (])<small><sup>]</sup></small> 09:47, 3 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Support''' original, the darker ones look over-ripe. --<font color="#FF0000">]</font>] (])<small><sup>]</sup></small> 09:47, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Support''' original, the others are much too saturated. ] 12:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC) *'''Support''' original, the others are much too saturated. ] 12:10, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
*'''Support''' Why not? If a picture is deftly aesthetic enough to incite the most subtle idiosyncrasies of the human taste buds, then... uh... never mind. I'm just really hungry. I support the original, but anything would do. The yellowish rasberry at the top left could be GIMPed out, but then the picture wouldn't be as "natural." ] <sup>]</sup> &#167; 17:11, 3 March 2006 (UTC)
{{breakafterimages}} {{breakafterimages}}

Revision as of 17:11, 3 March 2006

Raspberries

Raspberries
Darker Version
Darker Version
Darker Version

Looks delicious, and everything is the subject (by that I mean there is no b/g because the b/g is the subject as well!)
Alternative Versions: Image:Raspberries02.jpg, Image:Raspberries03.jpg

Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/raspberries: Difference between revisions Add topic