| Revision as of 02:36, 2 June 2011 editMbz1 (talk | contribs)22,338 edits →Misplaced Pages:Properly follow a proper policy: speedy← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:43, 2 June 2011 edit undoQrsdogg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers6,586 edits →Misplaced Pages:Properly follow a proper policy: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| * '''Delete''', no real value to WP, and violates AGF. <span style="text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD">--] (])</span> 01:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | * '''Delete''', no real value to WP, and violates AGF. <span style="text-shadow: 0.2em 0.2em 0.1em #DDDDDD">--] (])</span> 01:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Speedy delete''' This essay violates no policy, but because everybody believe it does, let's go ahead and speedy delete it. May I please ask the first admin who sees it to do it for me please?--] (]) 02:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | *'''Speedy delete''' This essay violates no policy, but because everybody believe it does, let's go ahead and speedy delete it. May I please ask the first admin who sees it to do it for me please?--] (]) 02:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Comment''' I had hoped to write an amusing Dante-esque satire of ANI/AE etc with Mbz1, and that was the genesis of this essay. The intent was never to attack anyone, and I'm sorry if it came across that way. Other than Mbz1 recently being topic-banned and the essay referring to topic-banning, at the time we worked on it I didn't think it closely related to her conflicts. My apologies to anyone who was offended. ] (]) 02:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:43, 2 June 2011
Misplaced Pages:Properly follow a proper policy
This is not a regular essay, nor is it a humorous essay. In reality, this is mbz1's crafty, creative retelling of her conflict with another user, Betsythedevine, at the AN/I board, at Improper image added. I am trying to comprehend just what goes on in a person's mind where they think that enshrining some wiki-conflict into project-space is acceptable behavior, but I am at a loss, quite honestly. This "essay" needs to be deleted, and a discussion begun at AN/I if this creation warrants further action. Tarc (talk) 00:17, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
*Keep According to the definition of "Essays are the opinion or advice of an editor or group of editors, for which widespread consensus has not been established. They do not speak for the entire community and may be created and written without approval. " So, this essays expressed my and another editor's opinion. There are definitely no any real user mentioned in this essay. If somebody sees himself as a prototype for this essay so it be, but it not a reason to delete it.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:35, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- I am going to go out on a limb and say that the "essays are the opinion or advice of..." aspect of essay creation refers to opinions that actually have something to do with editing in the Misplaced Pages itself. Your interpretation would essentially turn project-space into a blog. Tarc (talk) 00:51, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- DELETE per the noms reasoning. Serves no useful purpose except to inflame the situation mentioned. Heiro 00:37, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete Serves no useful purpose, other than to clearly indicate why so many other editors have difficulty working with Mbz1. Dayewalker (talk) 00:44, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete as disruptive nonsense, lacking humor. Adding cliches like "any resemblance to persons living or dead is purely coincidental" make the point very clear, while "harpy" is just an attack as we all know the intended victim. Johnuniq (talk) 01:25, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. WP:DR is thataway; this seems to verge on WP:POINT violation. --John (talk) 01:33, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Clearly not a bona fide essay. --Kleinzach 01:40, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Delete, no real value to WP, and violates AGF. --Nuujinn (talk) 01:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Speedy delete This essay violates no policy, but because everybody believe it does, let's go ahead and speedy delete it. May I please ask the first admin who sees it to do it for me please?--Mbz1 (talk) 02:36, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
- Comment I had hoped to write an amusing Dante-esque satire of ANI/AE etc with Mbz1, and that was the genesis of this essay. The intent was never to attack anyone, and I'm sorry if it came across that way. Other than Mbz1 recently being topic-banned and the essay referring to topic-banning, at the time we worked on it I didn't think it closely related to her conflicts. My apologies to anyone who was offended. Qrsdogg (talk) 02:43, 2 June 2011 (UTC)