Misplaced Pages

User talk:Jacurek: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 15:08, 28 June 2011 view sourceJacurek (talk | contribs)9,609 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 15:13, 28 June 2011 view source Jacurek (talk | contribs)9,609 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 25: Line 25:


This is how one dishonest administrator ({{admin|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}) and few nationalistic trolls can turn a good editor into a Misplaced Pages worst nightmare. GOOD LUCK--] (]) 22:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC) This is how one dishonest administrator ({{admin|Future Perfect at Sunrise}}) and few nationalistic trolls can turn a good editor into a Misplaced Pages worst nightmare. GOOD LUCK--] (]) 22:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


::::<big>..AND JACUREK KEEPS ON PLAYING GOLF</big>] ] LOL

Revision as of 15:13, 28 June 2011

June 2011

To enforce an arbitration decision, you have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the guide to appealing arbitration enforcement blocks and follow the instructions there to appeal your block. T. Canens (talk) 17:24, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Notice to administrators: In a March 2010 decision, the Committee held that "Administrators are prohibited from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page. Any administrator that overturns an enforcement action outside of these circumstances shall be subject to appropriate sanctions, up to and including desysopping, at the discretion of the Committee."

Blocked indefinitely for sock puppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Jacurek. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not.

If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. T. Canens (talk) 17:27, 14 June 2011 (UTC)
The first year of the block is made under the authority of WP:DIGWUREN#Discretionary sanctions and subject to the normal protections accorded to AE blocks specified in this motion of the Arbitration Committee. T. Canens (talk) 17:29, 14 June 2011 (UTC)


UGLY DOGS ARE BARKING

(check ALL fucking IP's this is not me "The ugly dogs" did it all)

("The ugly dogs" are on the move also most the socks listed in the report are not mine and were created by "the ugly dogs". Future Perfect at Sunrise you have opportunity to investigate and show that you have no bias but will you?.....he he he...)--Jacurek (talk) 15:07, 28 June 2011 (UTC)


..AND JACUREK KEEPS PLAYING GOLF LOL

This is how one dishonest administrator (Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA)) and few nationalistic trolls can turn a good editor into a Misplaced Pages worst nightmare. GOOD LUCK--Jacurek (talk) 22:28, 27 June 2011 (UTC)


..AND JACUREK KEEPS ON PLAYING GOLF LOL
User talk:Jacurek: Difference between revisions Add topic