| Revision as of 04:22, 23 July 2011 editSammi Brie (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Page movers, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers, Template editors151,556 edits →Solas nua← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:38, 24 July 2011 edit undoRon Ritzman (talk | contribs)75,721 edits Relisting debateNext edit → | ||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}} | {{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD|M}} | ||
| :{{la|Solas nua}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) | :{{la|Solas nua}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>) | ||
| :({{Find sources|Solas nua}}) | :({{Find sources|Solas nua}}) | ||
| Doesn't meet the ]. Also significant conflict of interest with creator listed as "social media manager" on given external link - the tone is bad. ] (] • ]) 06:32, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | Doesn't meet the ]. Also significant conflict of interest with creator listed as "social media manager" on given external link - the tone is bad. ] (] • ]) 06:32, 17 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| :*Added links to profiles by ] & ] ] (]) 23:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC) | :*Added links to profiles by ] & ] ] (]) 23:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| ::*IP editor is new and has only contributed to the article and this debate. ] (] • ]) 04:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC) | ::*IP editor is new and has only contributed to the article and this debate. ] (] • ]) 04:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC) | ||
| <hr style="width:55%;" /> | |||
| :<span style="color:#FF4F00;">'''] to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.'''</span><br /> | |||
| :<small>Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ] (]) 23:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)</small><!-- from Template:Relist -->] | |||
| <hr style="width:55%;" /> | |||
Revision as of 23:38, 24 July 2011
Solas nua
- Solas nua (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet the GNG. Also significant conflict of interest with creator listed as "social media manager" on given external link - the tone is bad. Raymie (t • c) 06:32, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep I have given the article a serious going-over and removed 90% of the puffery that was there, together with adding links and corrections. What is left is brief but I would consider this an established and notable arts organisation - there are quite a number of hits on an internet search. asnac (talk) 08:21, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 20:16, 17 July 2011 (UTC)
- Keep Significant coverage in WaPo, productions reviewed in NYT, won DC Mayor's Arts Award 86.44.35.99 (talk) 23:21, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- Added links to profiles by The Irish Times & NPR 86.44.35.99 (talk) 23:31, 19 July 2011 (UTC)
- IP editor is new and has only contributed to the article and this debate. Raymie (t • c) 04:22, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:38, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
Categories: