| Revision as of 17:16, 17 July 2011 editBpell (talk | contribs)208 edits ←Blanked the page← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:54, 2 August 2011 edit undoMystichumwipe (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users2,132 edits →9/11 conspiracy theories: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| == 9/11 conspiracy theories == | |||
| Hi | |||
| I see you raised similar thoughts to mine on this article some time back. | |||
| I agree with what you wrote and see that others have made the same observation over time, but to no avail. | |||
| I don't know if this is OK to do (contacting like-minded individuals to reach a consensus on a contentious article) or if you are still interested? But if it is OK, I wonder if I could ask for your involvement on the discussion page under '''Article neutrality and accuracy - the introduction''' ]--] (]) 15:54, 2 August 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 15:54, 2 August 2011
9/11 conspiracy theories
Hi I see you raised similar thoughts to mine on this article some time back. I agree with what you wrote and see that others have made the same observation over time, but to no avail. I don't know if this is OK to do (contacting like-minded individuals to reach a consensus on a contentious article) or if you are still interested? But if it is OK, I wonder if I could ask for your involvement on the discussion page under Article neutrality and accuracy - the introduction ]--Mystichumwipe (talk) 15:54, 2 August 2011 (UTC)