| Revision as of 09:01, 1 September 2011 editSineBot (talk | contribs)Bots2,556,609 editsm Signing comment by 122.176.161.4 - "→Topic ban: Very bad decision"← Previous edit | Revision as of 10:17, 1 September 2011 edit undoBlack Kite (talk | contribs)Administrators85,335 edits →Topic ban: spNext edit → | ||
| Line 60: | Line 60: | ||
| * You are topic banned from all Indian, Religion, and Hinduism topics, broadly construed and interpreted in all namespaces, including but not limited to mentions of India or Hinduism in any article even if outside the topic area of India, Religion and Hinduism. | * You are topic banned from all Indian, Religion, and Hinduism topics, broadly construed and interpreted in all namespaces, including but not limited to mentions of India or Hinduism in any article even if outside the topic area of India, Religion and Hinduism. | ||
| *During this period, a volunteer editor or admin in good standing, with significant experience as an editor and in DR, will mentor and help the user work towards a better editing style, and a more collegial editing behavior. At this mentor's recommendation, and in consultation with the community, the topic ban period can be reduced or extended as seen fit. | *During this period, a volunteer editor or admin in good standing, with significant experience as an editor and in DR, will mentor and help the user work towards a better editing style, and a more collegial editing behavior. At this mentor's recommendation, and in consultation with the community, the topic ban period can be reduced or extended as seen fit. | ||
| *Any violation of these sanctions can result |
*Any violation of these sanctions can result in any uninvolved admin blocking the user indefinitely. | ||
| *I have informed volunteer mentors of this sanction. | *I have informed the volunteer mentors of this sanction. They are ], ], and ]. | ||
| * Volunteer mentors are ], ], and ]. | |||
| *This sanction will expire on March 1, 2012 at 00.00UTC. | *This sanction will expire on March 1, 2012 at 00.00UTC. | ||
| ] ] 23:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC) | ] ] 23:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 10:17, 1 September 2011
| This talk page is automatically archived by MiszaBot III. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived. Sections without timestamps are not archived. |
| This is Thisthat2011's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 7 days  |
 Archives |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Bharat
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Unfinished Business
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talkpage
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Your return
Hello and welcome back to contributing here. It had been hoped by some who contributed at the recent ANI discussion that you would take the duration of the topic ban as an opportunity to become involved in areas of Misplaced Pages other than those related to India. It is clear that you chose not to do this, which is a course of action that is entirely within your rights but perhaps was not the cleverest of decisions.
Anyway, leaving that aside you have returned to contributing in the India-related sphere and are already displaying signs of tendentiousness. At Talk:2008 Mumbai attacks you have unnecessarily re-visited a discussion regarding the article title which had closed during your absence. Although much of your input is very garbled, your choice of words here could be construed as yet another personal attack. Especially, "Please keep your filth in your mind before vomiting it out. It stinks.". Please be careful because you will recall that the recent topic ban could be extended considerably, up to and including a total ban from English Misplaced Pages - WP:ROPE was mentioned and you should probably take heed of this. Best wishes. - Sitush (talk) 01:16, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- "you have unnecessarily re-visited a discussion regarding the article title which had closed during your absence."
- Read the mail again. I have clarified why I have said so. It is not unnecessary, especially when the editor is asking arbitrary questions in my absence. You have disregarded that he had asked some jumbled up question in my absence and then you have concluded that my mail was unnecessary.
- Why have you overlooked that he asked a very personal question in the first place? Please desist on presenting half-truths. If you want to discuss this, goto talk page, don't mess up people's talk pages, while you yourself are touchy about your own talk page http://en.wikipedia.org/User_talk:Thisthat2011/Archive_1#Regarding_User_talk:Sitush.23Warning_on_term_Shudra_.26_repeated_insistance_on_keeping_it_on_prominant_places_in_articles_on_Hindu_communities.
- Admins please come in and see what this guy is up to. How is this a personal attack?इति इतिUAनॆति नॆति Humour Thisthat2011 06:53, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- The discussion is ongoing at the talk page. The editor has asked a loaded question as if I support saffron terror directly. Why have you, or any other admin, not sent any message to him? Answer that on the talk page please.इति इतिUAनॆति नॆति Humour Thisthat2011 06:56, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Ok, since it seems that you have not understood what I said, the reason why I said it here is because it is a warning of sorts. The correct place for warnings, be they by use of templates or otherwise, is the user's talk page. Your comment about filth/vomit/stinks seems excessive to me. There are other ways in which you could have worded your disagreement. Or you could have just ignored what you appear to think was baiting, which may have been a sensible option given the thin-ness of the ice upon which you are currently treading. I will say no more because this thread has been referred to Salvio & doubtless you'll get some input from them. If I am wrong then I am wrong and will apologise. - Sitush (talk) 07:14, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- I understand that the user is experienced, though this time he has gone on an ego trip according to me. He has connected a few random things during an ongoing vote-discussion to make a point and pre-judged that a title including "terrorist" in title is non-neutral. I agree that it could be non-neutral as per his own understanding, but he should desist from assuming his views as already-divisive and then pre-judging others and connecting saffron attacks and then asking 'how do you feel', and then agains pre-judging my response, and so on. The user should take a chill pill and stop this pre-judging circus when in this 'community where I have to rebuild trust' it is the others like me who have to pay for his overt already-assumed-self-connectedness during an ongoing vote.
- By the way, have you warned him for his ongoing personal attacks against me?इति इतिUAनॆति नॆति Humour Thisthat2011 07:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:2008 Mumbai attacks. Thank you. Cerejota (talk) 07:22, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- Please desist from personal attacks and then give advice on AGF. By the way, I assume good faith for everyone by default, FYI.इति इतिUAनॆति नॆति Humour Thisthat2011 07:25, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Lets stop the drama
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--Cerejota (talk) 12:20, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
- I want to stop this roller too that has started in my absence.इति इतिUAनॆति नॆति Humour Thisthat2011 12:24, 25 August 2011 (UTC)
Topic ban
Per the community discussion at WP:ANI, the following restriction on your edits is enacted;
- You are topic banned from all Indian, Religion, and Hinduism topics, broadly construed and interpreted in all namespaces, including but not limited to mentions of India or Hinduism in any article even if outside the topic area of India, Religion and Hinduism.
- During this period, a volunteer editor or admin in good standing, with significant experience as an editor and in DR, will mentor and help the user work towards a better editing style, and a more collegial editing behavior. At this mentor's recommendation, and in consultation with the community, the topic ban period can be reduced or extended as seen fit.
- Any violation of these sanctions can result in any uninvolved admin blocking the user indefinitely.
- I have informed the volunteer mentors of this sanction. They are User:Nightscream, User:Ebe123, and User:KuduIO.
- This sanction will expire on March 1, 2012 at 00.00UTC.
Black Kite (t) (c) 23:49, 31 August 2011 (UTC)
- Thisthat: You should not take it too hard. Retiring or sitting out is not how you should react to it. Keep editing outside the topic ban. You should see ways to contest this decision, which is to put it simply: Wrong! 14.97.96.91 (talk) 07:49, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- Thisthat2011: This should have never, never, never have happened. Remember that many IPs all over India like the one above have been watching the developments quietly. You have many fans. Please do not retire or sit out or give up. Do not give up this user account. Keep editing in other areas. Read policies like wp:Topic ban, wp:Legal, wp:DRR, Arbitration and similar. You are the guv'nor! Indians, register your protest to the ban and support Thisthat2001 here! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.176.161.4 (talk) 09:00, 1 September 2011 (UTC)