Revision as of 01:39, 2 September 2011 editJimbo Wales (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Founder14,543 edits →Alexa bot idea: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:34, 2 September 2011 edit undoOsamaK (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers19,183 edits →Alexa bot ideaNext edit → | ||
Line 32: | Line 32: | ||
In the Internet industry, almost no one gives Alexa rankings credibility any more. Quantcast is the defacto standard in terms of publicly-available rankings. How hard would it be to have your bot take on the task of changing the articles it looks at over to Quantcast?--] (]) 01:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC) | In the Internet industry, almost no one gives Alexa rankings credibility any more. Quantcast is the defacto standard in terms of publicly-available rankings. How hard would it be to have your bot take on the task of changing the articles it looks at over to Quantcast?--] (]) 01:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC) | ||
: I think it will be easy to adapt the code to any ranking services but it seems that Quantcast only provides US-based rankings. If this is actually true, I wonder if we should adopt it and be US-centric. What do you think?--] (]) 16:34, 2 September 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:34, 2 September 2011
Archives | ||
Index
| ||
|
||
This page has archives. Sections older than 5 days may be automatically archived by ClueBot III. |
Alexa bot idea
In the Internet industry, almost no one gives Alexa rankings credibility any more. Quantcast is the defacto standard in terms of publicly-available rankings. How hard would it be to have your bot take on the task of changing the articles it looks at over to Quantcast?--Jimbo Wales (talk) 01:39, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
- I think it will be easy to adapt the code to any ranking services but it seems that Quantcast only provides US-based rankings. If this is actually true, I wonder if we should adopt it and be US-centric. What do you think?--OsamaK (talk) 16:34, 2 September 2011 (UTC)