Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Mariko Honda: Difference between revisions

< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 03:49, 23 September 2011 editAlpha Quadrant (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, File movers, Rollbackers39,980 edits Closing debate, result was keep← Previous edit		Revision as of 06:25, 23 September 2011 edit undoSandstein (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,615 edits Undid revision 451963656 by Alpha Quadrant (talk): Undoing inappropriate non-admin closureNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	<div class="boilerplate metadata afd vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
	:''The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page.''
	<!--Template:Afd top

	Note: If you are seeing this page as a result of an attempt to re-nominate an article for deletion, you must manually edit the AfD nomination links in order to create a new discussion page using the name format of ]. When you create the new discussion page, please provide a link to this old discussion in your nomination. -->

	The result was '''keep'''. (]) ] ] 03:49, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
	===]===		===]===
			{{REMOVE THIS TEMPLATE WHEN CLOSING THIS AfD\|B}}

	:{{la\|Mariko Honda}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>)		:{{la\|Mariko Honda}} – (<includeonly>]</includeonly><noinclude>]</noinclude>)
Line 35:		Line 29:
	*'''Comment''' ] seiyuu database lists her as having three interviews or articles in anime magazines . I haven't seen those articles (and can't read Japanese, so I couldn't read them anyway), but they might qualify as significant coverage from reliable sources. ] (]) 05:47, 20 September 2011 (UTC)		*'''Comment''' ] seiyuu database lists her as having three interviews or articles in anime magazines . I haven't seen those articles (and can't read Japanese, so I couldn't read them anyway), but they might qualify as significant coverage from reliable sources. ] (]) 05:47, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
	*: I have at least one of those magazines, but likewise I can't read it. If someone is willing to take a look (and I can actually find the issues in question) I can provide photos of the pages in question. ] (]) 13:57, 21 September 2011 (UTC)		*: I have at least one of those magazines, but likewise I can't read it. If someone is willing to take a look (and I can actually find the issues in question) I can provide photos of the pages in question. ] (]) 13:57, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
	:''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify it.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a ]). No further edits should be made to this page. <!--Template:Afd bottom--></div>

Revision as of 06:25, 23 September 2011

Mariko Honda

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested PROD. The subject fails both WP:BIO and WP:GNG. I have been unable to find any reliable sources for the subject. There are plenty of user-edited sources, but nothing reliable. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:21, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Japan-related deletion discussions. —Inks.LWC (talk) 18:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --Inks.LWC (talk) 18:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Inks.LWC (talk) 18:27, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Delete. Not seeing any reliable coverage or sourcing to satisfy notability criteria. --DAJF (talk) 22:54, 15 September 2011 (UTC)

Comment CSE search for 東山奈央. --Malkinann (talk) 05:47, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Keep Passes the guidelines for voice actors at WP:ENTERTAINER. Anime News Network does a good job of stating which were major roles in a series. If you sincerely doubt the information there, it can be confirmed on the person's official website, or in the credits of the products mentioned. Dream Focus 04:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Weak keep. There's enough here to where the characters she portrays are either main characters or notable characters and at least one of the series Omamori Himari has a decent following outside of Japan. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 05:35, 17 September 2011 (UTC)tokyogirl79

Keep. Per Dream Focus Comment and per WP:A&M/ORS.--Ald™ ¬_¬™ 12:39, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Keep. --shikai shaw (talk) 19:45, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Delete: She's a Japanese voice actress and even the Japanese Misplaced Pages doesn't have an article for her. While that in and of itself isn't a reason to delete, she does not appear to be notable. Yes the info is verifiable (although relying solely on ANN's database for a keep when its been shown numerous times to be unreliable is bad form), there is no reason to believe she is notable.陣内 _Jinnai 21:57, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Comment Hitoshi Doi's seiyuu database lists her as having three interviews or articles in anime magazines . I haven't seen those articles (and can't read Japanese, so I couldn't read them anyway), but they might qualify as significant coverage from reliable sources. Calathan (talk) 05:47, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
I have at least one of those magazines, but likewise I can't read it. If someone is willing to take a look (and I can actually find the issues in question) I can provide photos of the pages in question. Shiroi Hane (talk) 13:57, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Categories: