| Revision as of 02:11, 21 November 2011 editJCScaliger (talk | contribs)1,061 edits →Requested move: Emerson← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:18, 21 November 2011 edit undoMike Cline (talk | contribs)Administrators53,120 edits →Requested move: commentNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| ] → {{no redirect|1=Jacob Neusner bibliography}} – This article is an author bibliography, in other words, it is a list of published works by a particular author. In the ], there are 244 entries. ~97% of those articles are entitled ]. Per ] of which '''''Consistency''' – Does the proposed title follow the same pattern as those of similar articles? Many of these patterns are documented in the naming guidelines listed in the Specific-topic naming conventions box above, and ideally indicate titles that are in accordance with the principles behind the above questions.'' is policy and the advice given in ], the proposed title is better from a consistency standpoint. ] (]) 16:30, 20 November 2011 (UTC) | ] → {{no redirect|1=Jacob Neusner bibliography}} – This article is an author bibliography, in other words, it is a list of published works by a particular author. In the ], there are 244 entries. ~97% of those articles are entitled ]. Per ] of which '''''Consistency''' – Does the proposed title follow the same pattern as those of similar articles? Many of these patterns are documented in the naming guidelines listed in the Specific-topic naming conventions box above, and ideally indicate titles that are in accordance with the principles behind the above questions.'' is policy and the advice given in ], the proposed title is better from a consistency standpoint. ] (]) 16:30, 20 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| *'''Strongly oppose''' this hobgoblin. Consistency in error is not desirable; and the same link shows that precision is also valued. The present title describes this article and no other; the proposed title would describe this article, a list of works ''about'' him, or a mixture. ] (]) 02:10, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | *'''Strongly oppose''' this hobgoblin. Consistency in error is not desirable; and the same link shows that precision is also valued. The present title describes this article and no other; the proposed title would describe this article, a list of works ''about'' him, or a mixture. ] (]) 02:10, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Comment''' ~97% of the 246 articles in ] are entited ''Author bibliography''. A bibliography ''About'' someone is properly entitled ''Bibliography of author'', the author being to topic of the bibliography, not the author of the works listed. ] is a good example of this. --] (]) 02:18, 21 November 2011 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:18, 21 November 2011
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 February 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | Judaism List‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
 | Books List‑class | ||||||
| |||||||
 | Bibliographies List‑class | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
VfD
On April 6, 2005, this article was nominated for deletion. The result was keep. See Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Jacob Neusner bibliography for a record of the discussion. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 01:37, 24 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- It was nominated again, and kept: Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Jacob Neusner bibliography 2. Eugene van der Pijll 21:36, 10 August 2005 (UTC)
Why was the conclusion listed as "keep"?
Why was the conclusion listed as "keep"? Looking at the most recent discussion page on the proposal to delete the article, shouldn't it be concluded that the consensus was to trim down the bibliography to a more reasonable level, and merge that into the main Jacob Neusner article? I am concerned that Neusner's massive bibliography page is (a) not an encyclopedia article, (b) a vanity page, (c) Totally out of line when compared to the bibliographies of all other people on this entire encyclopedia, and (d) not even in line with Neusner's own college! They don't bother to place all this info on their website. Given the comments on the discussion page, I hope if no one takes offense at me attempting to edit this bibliography down to a more modest level. RK 21:27, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Please see Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Jacob_Neusner_bibliography_2
- I think that is the best thing one can do with this page. JFW | T@lk 22:06, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Honsetly, This page is ridiculous. I suggest we place all the translations as one entry, (translations of Talmud and Medrash), and similar editing.Wolf2191 15:02, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
I attempted to cut down on entries but it's to much work. I suggest cutting out all translation entries into one main entry. If no complaints over next few days I'll do it. As it is the page is not useful.Wolf2191 15:06, 3 August 2007 (UTC)
Requested move
 | The request to rename this article to Jacob Neusner bibliography has been carried out.
If the page title has consensus, be sure to close this discussion using {{subst:RM top|'''page moved'''.}} and {{subst:RM bottom}} and remove the {{Requested move/dated|…}} tag, or replace it with the {{subst:Requested move/end|…}} tag. |
List of books by Jacob Neusner → Jacob Neusner bibliography – This article is an author bibliography, in other words, it is a list of published works by a particular author. In the Category:Bibliographies by author, there are 244 entries. ~97% of those articles are entitled Author bibliography. Per WP:PRINCIPALNAMINGCRITERIA of which Consistency – Does the proposed title follow the same pattern as those of similar articles? Many of these patterns are documented in the naming guidelines listed in the Specific-topic naming conventions box above, and ideally indicate titles that are in accordance with the principles behind the above questions. is policy and the advice given in WikiProject Bibliographies, the proposed title is better from a consistency standpoint. Mike Cline (talk) 16:30, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
- Strongly oppose this hobgoblin. Consistency in error is not desirable; and the same link shows that precision is also valued. The present title describes this article and no other; the proposed title would describe this article, a list of works about him, or a mixture. JCScaliger (talk) 02:10, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
- Comment ~97% of the 246 articles in Category:Bibliographies by author are entited Author bibliography. A bibliography About someone is properly entitled Bibliography of author, the author being to topic of the bibliography, not the author of the works listed. Bibliography of Abraham Lincoln is a good example of this. --Mike Cline (talk) 02:18, 21 November 2011 (UTC)