Misplaced Pages

User talk:Chzz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 17:54, 25 November 2011 editKenullman (talk | contribs)15 edits David Ross McAndie refs's: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 18:18, 25 November 2011 edit undoBouteloua (talk | contribs)133 edits Huawei revision: new sectionNext edit →
Line 242: Line 242:


<!-- Please put a meaningful 'subject line' above, please link to whatever page(s) you are asking about - e.g. ] - and please remember to 'sign' at the end if your message, with ~~~~ Thanks! --> <!-- Please put a meaningful 'subject line' above, please link to whatever page(s) you are asking about - e.g. ] - and please remember to 'sign' at the end if your message, with ~~~~ Thanks! -->

== Huawei revision ==

Hi Chzz, I have considered your response and made a change to the proposed language on the ]. If you have time to review it and offer your thoughts on the new version, I would greatly appreciate it. --] (]) 18:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:18, 25 November 2011


Talk to me

Talk to me
Talk to me


Leave me a message

Leave me a message
Leave me a message


Emergency Misplaced Pages shutdown

DO NOT PRESS

DO NOT PRESS
DO NOT PRESS
Where has my message gone?
My talkpage is very active, so please check the archives.
Put your user name or article name into this box, and 'search'-----→
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36

b b

This user account is a bot operated by Chzz (talk). It is used to make repetitive automated or semi-automated edits that would be extremely tedious to do manually, in accordance with the bot policy. This bot does not yet have the approval of the community, or approval has been withdrawn or expired, and therefore shouldn't be making edits that appear to be unassisted except in the operator's or its own user and user talk space.
Administrators: if this bot is making edits that appear to be unassisted to pages not in the operator's or its own userspace, please block it.
This discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it.

{{bot|Chzz|status=approved}}

Archiving icon
Archives

1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10
11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20
21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40


ChzzBot IV is a bot (i.e. an automated editing program)

Refer to User talk:Chzz

Function

SEE Misplaced Pages:Bots/Requests for approval/ChzzBot IV

Please direct all enquiries to User:Chzz - Click here to leave a message.

For every entry in Category:Pending AfC submissions,

If it appears to be a submission - ie, it contains "{{afc submission") and the page name begins with "Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/", and doesn't contain "template:", and
If the page has no references at all (ie no "<ref" case-insensitive), or "{{harv" or "{{sfn" and
If it's not a disambig - ie doesn't contain "{disamb") or "{{dab" or "{{dbig" or the title contains "disambig",, and the AFC is not in a category containing "disambig" (e.g. {{geodis}} THEN
IF the creator has no user talk page at all, it adds a short 'welcome' -
Then it adds a message about the AFC needing a reference; User:ChzzBot IV/AFC unreferenced
It also adds a note to the AFC, and logs the actions to User:ChzzBot_IV/log.

Templates

Emergency Shutoff

If the bot is causing any problems, feel free to block it - and please inform the bot operator(s) on their talk page and/or by email.

Administrator emergency shutoff


Jorg Janke

Resolved – Were reviewed multiple times... mabdul 12:28, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi ChzzBot IV

I have updated the article http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Jorg_Janke, please review and reply me

Thanks, Winningindians — Preceding unsigned comment added by Winningindians (talkcontribs) 02:05, 20 March 2012 (UTC)

Patrick E. McGovern

Resolved – Article already accepted. mabdul 12:32, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

Dear ChzzBot IV,

I received your message that I need inline references in the "Patrick E. McGovern" article. But the original submission included numerous inline refs., which now have been deleted. How do I get back to the original version?

Best, William Pepper — Preceding unsigned comment added by Drwilliampepper (talkcontribs) 14:45, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

Nail

Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Nail (edit | project page | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi, this is Dodobird1982. You told me I need references but what if you learn something through a personal experience. In this case, I watched Dragon Ball Z, and that is how I know about the character Nail. Please respond as soon as you can! Thanks! Dodobird1982 (talk) 20:36, 20 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi Dodobird1982,
this is not how Misplaced Pages works. Misplaced Pages is an encyclopedia and thus your submission falls likely in the category which is not covered by Misplaced Pages. Please read WP:NOT and consider searching at Wikia for the Dragon Ball wiki. Regards, mabdul 12:38, 24 April 2012 (UTC)

A kitten for you!

Thank you very much chzzbot for the review of my article and your guidance to improve it.

Kunalkulpati (talk) 22:04, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

About <The Flavor of corn> article_article-2012-05-04T17:01:00.000Z">

Hello,

Here I wanna discuss some questions about article <The Flavor of corn>. Here it's link http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/The_Flavor_of_Corn

So, in this article (which was denied by you as unverified)I added all improtant information, including supported by reliable sources. 3 times I was tried to make this article affirmed, but even after I added reliable and verifed sources, it's still was denied to be article. Is this homophoby or what?? And if my sources are not verifed, which you can call verifed sourses then??

Please respond me here, thanks in advance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.70.15.114 (talk) 17:01, 4 May 2012 (UTC)_article"> _article">

The High Quality Transport Refrigeration Parts

Hi, Recently i had purchased transport refrigeration parts from a site www.thermoenginesupply.com.The thermo king parts are of high quality and at affordable price. THERMO ENGINE SUPPLY is a leader in quality replacement parts for Thermo King transport refrigeration units. High-quality replacement parts for Thermo King transport refrigeration units and equipment.

Thermo Engine Supply offers a comprehensive line of fast-moving parts for your Thermo King, transport refrigeration unit maintenance and service needs.

we can purchase thermo king compressors,thermo king alternators,thermo king pumps and thermo king belts also. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thermoenginesupply (talkcontribs) 13:28, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Just in case you ever restart this

User:ChzzBot IV/AFC unreferenced is wrong. You need to completely re-code this if you ever try to run it again. The use of <ref> tags is absolutely not required, and you should not be telling users that their AFC submissions don't include WP:Inline citations merely because they don't use ref tags. WhatamIdoing (talk) 15:54, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

The Reference Links have been updated in the Article. And Links are made with proper attention. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ravinder3790 (talkcontribs) 10:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)

Dubstep

hello, chzz, i noticed the goings on over on the talk page for dubstep - it seems the editor wants his name added to the 'post-dubstep' section (why he felt the need to post the entire article on talk is beyond me) - and has created an article, Amdukias. seems to me a clear WP:COI, and i'd wager there are WP:N issues there too. Kaini (talk) 00:03, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Talk:TV5MONDE

Hey, Chzz. I've commented at the article talk page and would appreciate any assistance that you have to offer. You can post there as I have the page watchlisted. See ya'round Tiderolls

I'll try to get to it one day, but it might take a while; I have a list of lots of things-to-do. I understand the key point though. I'd think, probably, it just needs better coverage within the same article page, rather than a separate one. I've also added an {{update}} tag. Anyway...I'll try and look.  Chzz  ►  07:14, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

about recent change in talk Operation Trident (1971)

hi i saw your comment on talk Operation Trident (1971) the other party is taking your comment as an excuse to remove the dispute tag from the article again and again here. I understand that you do not want to get involved in the discussion of the talk page. But the Tags are important so that relevant editors having expertise in the section review the edits being questioned on the talk page. SInce my tags are being reverted multiple times .i request you to clarify about this and restore tags on top of article Operation Trident (1971)--ÐℬigXЯaɣ 08:37, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

If it is being repeatedly removed, then that means someone (you?) is putting it back. Instead, you should discuss it on the talk page, and work towards getting a consensus/agreement. If you cannot agree, see WP:DISPUTE.  Chzz  ►  08:52, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Edits to Huawei "Security concerns"

Hi Chzz, thank you for making the edit I proposed regarding Iran in the Huawei article, it is much appreciated. I have now also added a more specific request regarding the sentence on the Taliban in that same section. My apologies for not adding this in the first place, I had linked to the note on the Conflict of Interest Noticeboard where I made the request, but neglected to add the detail to the Huawei talk page request. I would greatly appreciate if you could review the edit I propose and make this change if you think that it is acceptable. Thank you. --Bouteloua (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I did take a look, but I'm not too sure; see .  Chzz  ►  18:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Added inline references

I have added inline references. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Seanberney (talkcontribs) 17:21, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Re. Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Elevate
Thanks. However, articles need independent, reliable sources. "elevatethemovie.com" is not Independent, and IMDB is not reliable. It needs better references. Chzz  ►  07:21, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

IRC - I can't type

I clicked on link you provided to IRC. (Thank you for that & rest of what you wrote.) People started responding. ping stopped before i could pong. flurry of responses. anytime i tried to type, nothing on screen. sometimes, it went to find-box, but that could be my fault. (or Linux's)KnowLimits (talk) 22:13, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Type in the white area at the bottom; click in the white area to make it 'active'.

MY RESPONSE: Though unsure if OK for me to add comment in middle, rather than end of item.For me, this is like email, responding inline. At the time, I tried that. nothing appeared. When I make next attemmpt, I will learn more. Per other discussion, next attempt planned for small group, to let me get hang of process. --KnowLimits (talk) 11:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

There might be other people getting help / other discussions, but you can ignore those.

MY RESPONSE: Was not happening that time. So "help IRC" is like internet live-chat when customer service talking with several people at same time? --KnowLimits (talk) 11:03, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

 Chzz  ►  00:09, 22 November 2011 (UTC)


Can we ( me & 1-3 people) do a trial run (sometime - not today), so i can see how this works - before inviting the whole crowd? If so, please tell me who I should contact and how (link?) Would it help if I give few hours/day/days notice of when ready to do it?

Note, when I tried to save, an i (information ball) arrived, I did not understand third sentence - until read several times. (You auto-asked for edit-summary.) Suggest replace word "one" with actual meaning.KnowLimits (talk) 01:20, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Replied (briefly) over on user talk page.  Chzz  ►  07:06, 22 November 2011 (UTC) +again  Chzz  ►  11:08, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Received your Email note, No real problem but I thought I would chat, actually that error was quite some time back, and I don't ...

To Chzz, got your message

Dear Chzz, I got your Email message. It referred to an error I observed once when editing. Unfortunately it was some time back and I don't remember which article I was working on. But I do remember that it was the appearance of some Russian chemistry which didn't below where it intruded. Perhaps someone had been editing something in Russian and accidentally got it into my article. But it didn't seem to be a permanent intrusion.

In any case, it is not something to be concerned about now.

Chzz, it was good to hear from you. You were being too formal with my last name. I'm Howard to my friends.

I've written five Misplaced Pages articles on Organic Chemical things of interest (Important in my view). What I'm finding is that the really critical things are beyond what are in textbooks, and the opinion has been offered that articles should have only textbook stuff. But that would leave out the most important things. the textbook writers are not that knowledgeable in chemistry.

I've also found a number of items which have come from my research but have been written up by other editors. Generally they are well-written.

On a personal note, you may have noted that here in Madison, Wisconsin we have had some weird protests. They have stemmed from a conflict between the Governor and the Unions. He has balanced our budget without raising taxes and has given flexibility to the School Boards and Municipalities permitting them to avoid layoffs, that is, except where the Unions have rushed in to block him. But so many are persuaded that the Union Bargaining is a "right" when the Economics don't permit what they want. This pertains to the State.

We have National problems but not so easily solved.

Chzz, it was good to hear from you. You had been so very helpful in the past.

I'll end here.

Howard Hez (talk) 00:19, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Great to hear from you! I'm thrilled that you've embraced the Misplaced Pages idea; we so need people like yourself, to help improve our "sum of all human knowledge"!
  • Re. the error - sometimes, strange things happen, and if the error goes away, it's best to just "blame aliens" and not worry or bother to investigate; life is too short. If it now works, it works, and that's all that matters.
  • "Beyond textbooks" is fine - of course; it's great; it's what Misplaced Pages is all about - as long as it's verifiable! As you know, 'original research' - whilst laudable - belongs elsewhere; an Encyclopaedia cannot publish novel information, it can only report the things documented elsewhere.
  • I'm sorry to hear of your local taxation disputes; no, I did not know about that; it hasn't hit our UK news so far. But the more general issue of the Western systems as a whole is certainly a "hot topic"; earlier today, I spent quite a long time looking at http://xkcd.com/980/ (if you click on it, you 'zoom in') - fascinating stuff.
Best wishes,  Chzz  ►  00:35, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Request for feedback on User:Timeport101/Verax NMS

Hello Chzz, thanks for a great feedback you gave me on User:Timeport101/Verax NMS. I've implmented your suggestions and found additional references. I'd like to ask you about your opinion on this. I'm not sure if I cited refrences 100% correct (research papers and workshop materials).--Timeport101 (talk) 13:45, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

I've responded, as well; seriously, if I saw this at npp now I'd send it on through as patrolled. I've stuck one {{cn}} tag on it. Pesky (talkstalk!) 15:30, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Moved to Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Verax NMS.
The live page has been protected from creation (following Misplaced Pages:Articles_for_deletion/Verax_NMS), but I think the new draft is OK, so I asked if the page could be unprotected -  Chzz  ►  00:19, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Editing: Next Steps

Hi,

I submitted an article entitled "USTA Eastern," and got a message asking for citations. I inserted a number of citations and was just wondering what the next steps are to getting the article published.

Thanks so much, Geostory (talk) 16:54, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Most/all of the references are not independent reliable sources; almost all are at usta.com. Please see WP:VRS and WP:PSTS.  Chzz  ►  10:04, 23 November 2011 (UTC)


Chester Valley Trail

Haha, that's why I stopped doing that awhile ago, I wasn't very good at it. xP Glacialfox (talk) 01:52, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Dan Terry

Greetings! I was wondering what specific items for which I need to include in-line references for my article on Dan Terry. The Leonard Feather article about his early career -- referenced here http://danterrybigbigband.wordpress.com/press/1960-the-encyclopedia-of-jazz/ -- should cover issues about the musician until 1954. Can you recommend a better way I can include that information in the article? Perhaps there are items later in the article that need references. Please advise. Thank you! Kostraba (talk) 03:55, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/Dan Terry

inline references.

Hello

i went onto chat as i am not exactly tech savvy(!) to try and make sure i included inline references. i have done one, however am not sure what else is needed, or indeed if i have done it correctly. apolagies for not getting this right, is there anything lse i should do please? I understand that i shouild not include references from the woodford website for example..?

many thanks

Supertrooooper — Preceding unsigned comment added by Supertrooooper (talkcontribs) 12:35, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

The reference you've added it OK, yes... except that I don't think it verifies that it's the only such charity. It shows it's a charity though - so yes, it's a good start.
You can use their own website, but with care; it's a primary source, so it should only be used for simple, neutral facts - and not for any type of claim. For example, ChzzCo is based in London.<ref> http://www.chzzco.co.uk/about.html </ref> -that's OK. But ChzzCo has over 9000 customers per year.<ref> http://www.chzzco.co.uk/accounts.html </ref> -that is not OK.
Also, primary sources do not help show 'notability' - because all articles need to show "significant coverage in independent reliable sources". The article must mostly be based on independent references. For more info, see WP:PSTS.  Chzz  ►  12:46, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

The Ten Year War

Hello. This is in regard to your critique of my article Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/The Ten Year War. I did read your notes and I still have some questions as to why you rejected it. I tried to chat with you a few minutes ago but couldn't figure out how to get it to work.

You mentioned that there were "large portions" of the piece that were unreferenced. Besides the background, what are they? I included 36 citations in the article, all from reliable third-party sources.

I'd also like to add that I'm a staunch Michigan fan and I hate Ohio State with a passion. :) So, it would be a tall order for me to say anything complimentary about Woody Hayes (referring to the "brilliant" passage you referred to). But I went out of my way to make the piece fair and objective. If you follow college football at all, you'd see that Hayes won three national titles at Ohio State, was there for 28 seasons and was treated like royalty. If that's not brilliant, I don't know what is. College coaches don't stay in one place for that long if there's no record of excellence. I'm willing to drop the "brilliant" reference or find a source, but I think that's common knowledge. You also mentioned that there were multiple statements of opinion besides that. Where?

As to the statement that Hayes was fired, Hayes WAS fired. If you saw the clip that I included (from ABC Sports, a reliable source), you'd see why he was fired. There are other articles on Misplaced Pages, namely Woody Hayes that state that he was fired and there were no citations stating such.

A lot of work was put into this article and if you were in my shoes, you'd hate to see all that work shot down like that. Any guidance you can give on this to make the article "live" would be a huge help. Thanks! Mdb1370 (talk) 15:18, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I certainly didn't mean to shoot it down, not at all; just to help improve it a bit before accepting it.
Regarding "fired" - I'm always extra-careful about any possibly-negative BLP claims that appear to be unreferenced. If the ABC Sport had been a ref on the end of that fact, I would not have worried.
I'm sure the information comes from reliable sources, but because some things don't have a ref actually on the end of the claim, I couldn't tell, without hunting through all the other stuff. Apart from 'background', some of the seemingly-unref'd-things are - in == 1969: Michigan 24, Ohio State 12 ==;
  • Ohio State's 1969 team was dubbed by the media as the "greatest college football team of all time", with a handful of proven All-Big Ten players and All-Americans. - is that covered in the same ref at the end of the next sentence? I do not have access to the book myself, so I cannot check.
The specific problem there is, as follows; imagine if I wrote Chzz was born in 1901. Chzz lives in England. <ref> good reliable source </ref> - and then later, someone edited it, putting Chzz was born in 1901. Chzz has a pet cat. Chzz lives in England. <ref> good reliable source </ref> - I'm sure you can see the problem there; is the pet cat fact covered in the ref? We don't know. For that reason, it's best to add references on the end of each sentence. It's "acceptable" to have a ref just at the end of a paragraph, but it does lead to that problem.
  • Quarterback Don Moorhead would score two plays later on the keeper to extend Michigan’s lead to 21-12. Michigan would kick a field goal and go into the locker room with a stunning 24-12 lead. - that's the end of the paragraph, and there's no ref.
  • The next two-sentence paragraph, starting with In the third quarter... has no reference.
  • Ohio State finished at #4.
The same kind of thing is true of the other sections.
Regarding neutral language,
  • Probably the most significant aspect of this stretch of the rivalry was - avoid 'probably' - it either is a fact we can support with a reference, or it is just an opinion and shouldn't be in the article.
  • a stunning 24-12 lead - no need for the word "stunning" - just present the fact, and let the reader decide how significant it is
  • Hayes really going ballistic - not encyclopaedic language; try to keep it more formal such as, "Hayes became more angry"
  • a freshman phenom named Archie Griffin - do you mean "phenomenon"?
  • the record Ohio Stadium crowd screaming themselves hoarse - unnecessary exaggeration; just "screaming" would be quite enough
  • Lytle would be stuffed by two Ohio State defenders "stuffed" isn't very appropriate
  • only blemish was a heartbreaking loss to Oklahoma - opinion rather than fact (whose heart did it break?)
  • whacking the ABC-TV cameraman do you mean 'hitting'?
  • Tom Cousineau was considered the country’s best defensive player - according to who?
  • Avoid contractions - such as "he'd" instead of "he had", or "couldn't" instead of "could not" - there are quite a few, throughout.
Please note, these are just suggestions for improvement; I'm not really concerned about them, it's just ideas for making it better. The only thing that truly matters is, the referencing. Hope that helps,  Chzz  ►  10:47, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

About not acceptance of article Joe Gunther (singer)

http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Joe_Gunther_(singer) Joe Gunther (singer) Thank you for reviewing the article I submitted. You said in your reply none of the references mention the person. If you pay attention to the right side bar, you will see Joe Gunther is the stage name for "Joao Barao Neto" mentioned in both articles, including[REDACTED] page about James Durbin's debut album, currently one of the TOP20 selling albums in the world.

I would appreciate if you could take another look at the article and therefore accept it.

Joaoneto1982 (talk) 19:28, 24 November 2011 (UTC) Thanks!

Hi. I'm sorry I missed that connection, but in there's only a very brief mention of Neto, and I still can't see anything in . We need "significant" coverage about the subject of the article, to meet WP:GNG. The success of Durbin's album doesn't help.  Chzz  ►  19:45, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Hello Chzz. Neto was one the songwriters of http://en.wikipedia.org/Memories_of_a_Beautiful_Disaster. Therefore I would like to be able to link his name on that page to his own page. I don't see how different he is from other writers on the page that have their own writer's page on Misplaced Pages such as http://en.wikipedia.org/Paul_Trust or http://en.wikipedia.org/Anna_Waronker The references I added to Neto's page prove him to be one of the writers of song Deeper, and the other reference link shows that song is James Durbin's favorite song in the album. Also his album being one of the current Top 20 selling albums in the world and that song being his favorite song in the album are enough notoriety to establish Neto as a songwriter worth of a page of his own. I kindly ask you to review your decision. Joaoneto1982 (talk) 23:00, 24 November 2011 (UTC)Thank you.

MtC drive

So, thanks for joining the next MtC drive. I'm here since you forgot to add yourself to the logs page, and it would be boring to get nothing for transferring 3 thousand files. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 20:43, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Chzz. You have new messages at Debastein's talk page.
Message added 20:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Debastein (talk) 20:49, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, Chzz

Thank you for your message re references in other Misplaced Pages articles. Happy thanksgiving. Songcat (talk) 22:59, 24 November 2011 (UTC)

Page Visibility

Hi,

I just had my first page approved for qualifying non-uk pension schemes but i can't seem to find it in the search results at all...Does this just take time or do I need to add something to the page so the search engine is able to find it related to various keywords?

MrHarrison123 (talk) 10:13, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

It just takes time - up to a day - before it's been indexed in the Misplaced Pages search. It'll work if you put in the exact title, Qualified Non-UK Pension Scheme. Google has already found it although for me, it is about the 8th entry (it varies, by region). The Misplaced Pages article will probably move up the Google ranking soon.  Chzz  ►  10:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)


http://en.wikipedia.org/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/John_Seymour_of_Sawbridgeworth Okay Chzz, I'm starting to clue-in to the message. I still believe that factual and interesting information belongs in an encyclopedia, and will completely re-write it with a Joe Friday tone. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 186.99.172.140 (talk) 13:45, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

EcoMil Almond article

hello! I'm writing to you because I'm having some troubles with publishing an article... and as you have reviewed it twice, I was wondering if you could give some advice?

It's the first time I publish anything in Misplaced Pages. I'm a vegan, and when I moved to UK I found this product, EcoMil, and I thought it could be interesting to talk about it here, as other products like Alpro and Provamel are already in the wiki. I don't really want to make it soung as an advertisement, I've even used some medical studies to support it, but I still can't make it right...

Could you please give me a hand with that, and give some tips to make it work?

Thank you very much!!

(Cristina-nutriops (talk) 15:17, 25 November 2011 (UTC))


re: http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/David_Ross_McAndie&action=submit I have added a couple of ref's but most of the information is in our family history which is not published. What do you suggest?

Kenullman (talk) 17:41, 25 November 2011 (UTC) Thanks!



David Ross McAndie refs's

I added a couple of references to Articles for creation/David Ross McAndie and resubmitted.Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/David_Ross_McAndie Kenullman (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2011 (UTC) Thanks!


Huawei revision

Hi Chzz, I have considered your response and made a change to the proposed language on the Huawei discussion page. If you have time to review it and offer your thoughts on the new version, I would greatly appreciate it. --Bouteloua (talk) 18:18, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Categories:
User talk:Chzz: Difference between revisions Add topic