Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license.
Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat.
We can research this topic together.
Hi. I think you have been involved a lot with the GA of ]. We need help to salvage the article. Thanks. ] (]) 16:38, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
Hi. I think you have been involved a lot with the GA of ]. We need help to salvage the article. Thanks. ] (]) 16:38, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
:Thanks for letting me know about this. Looking at the extent of the copyvio, it would be more appropriate to work from the current version than to try and salvage the tainted version. ''']''' ''']''' 19:49, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
:Thanks for letting me know about this. Looking at the extent of the copyvio, it would be more appropriate to work from the current version than to try and salvage the tainted version. ''']''' ''']''' 19:49, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
== Alexander John Cuza vs Alexandru Ioan Cuza ==
Please can you say your option about Alexander John Cuza vs Alexandru Ioan Cuza at ]. -- Thanks, ] (]) 15:41, 2 December 2011 (UTC)
This page has archives. Sections older than 31 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 7 sections are present.
This is a Misplaced Pages user talk page. This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Codrinb.
This user advocates unified discussion, if you comment here, I will reply on your talk page and move the entire discussion to your talk page in the process; I would prefer it if you did the same, moving the thread back here for your reply. That way the discussions will always stay together and the intended recipient will see the message alert when he or she logs on. If you create a broken discussion by replying here while leaving my comments on your talk page, I may leave the discussion as is and continue the broken discussion, or I may reunite the discussion in my reply, depending on what I think makes more sense. Alternatively , use {{talkback}} (see below). Thanks.
If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Codrinb}} on your talk.
In early September I expanded the article Dromichaetes and now it has one section on Helis. There's a short discussion there. I found a lot about Sboryanovo and Sveshtari, but not so much about the north-Danubian contemporary settlements. Maybe you can wiki-link some of those proposals to the relevant archaeological sites (now they point to modern villages and towns). Also if you can improve or expand the text it would be great. Thank you in advance. Daizus (talk) 15:17, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
Hello, I'm doing fine, sorry it took so long to reply. If that kind of thing happens again, there are two things to keep in mind. First, strike while the iron is hot. The vandalism there was two months old; for administrators to care, it needs to be recent (say, under 2 days old) or ongoing. Second, I would recommend either WP:AIV or WP:ANI. Either of those will hopefully yield a quick and decisive result. - Biruitorul17:16, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Books on Dacia
Hi, this message is to let you know about disambiguation links you've recently created. A link to a disambiguation page is almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. For more information, see the FAQ or drop a line at the DPL WikiProject.
Regarding WP:DACIA, we need all help we can get. The only thing that worries me is that you were banned before. However from your statements upon lifting the ban, I understand you are up to speed with Misplaced Pages rules and guidelines. As you probably know, Dacia as a subject is loaded with controversy and nationalism. We have to strive to keep a neutral view on all articles. Please review the WP Dacia scope and goals. As for tasks, we have a lot of work: WP Dacia tasks. For samples of good work look at WP Dacia featured articles, the top quality articles in the assessment chart, and articles like Ziridava. I suggest you read the project page, to get familiar with the guidelines, templates and ideas behind the project. If Antes is of interest to you, start with that, although from WP Dacia perspective, it is of marginal importance, being at the extreme end of the time span covered by the project. Alternatively, Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Dacia/Drafts/List of Dacian towns and fortresses is currently in the works in the drafts section and needs much more work.
Regarding Antes, the statement ancient Slavic-Iranian tribal union and most of the article are controversial, and most certainly badly needs references. They are almost non-existent. If you think, that maybe those statements are from that book, they will need to be properly reference to the actual pages. Careful though about WP:PLAGIARISM. Also, the article needs to be balanced out using different authors not just rely on a single source or point of view. I suggest you get more familiar with WP:NPOV, WP:OR and WP:CITE.
Hello, Codrinb. You have new messages at Talk:Roman Dacia. Message added 16:38, 21 November 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Thanks for letting me know about this. Looking at the extent of the copyvio, it would be more appropriate to work from the current version than to try and salvage the tainted version. SilkTork19:49, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
