Misplaced Pages

:Sockpuppet investigations/Rinpoche: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:18, 15 April 2012 editElen of the Roads (talk | contribs)16,638 edits result← Previous edit Revision as of 00:19, 15 April 2012 edit undoElen of the Roads (talk | contribs)16,638 edits →Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments: and that was meNext edit →
Line 37: Line 37:
{{checkuser|1=LornaDooneBlackmore}} {{checkuser|1=LornaDooneBlackmore}}


RUCloseYet? is {{likely}} on checkuser and {{megaphoneduck}}, so I think time can be called on this account. RUCloseYet? is {{likely}} on checkuser and {{megaphoneduck}}, so I think time can be called on this account.--] (]) 00:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC)


---- ----

Revision as of 00:19, 15 April 2012

Rinpoche

Rinpoche (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

Populated account categories: confirmed · suspected

For archived investigations, see Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Rinpoche/Archive.

A long-term abuse case exists at Misplaced Pages:Long-term abuse/Rinpoche.

– A user has requested CheckUser. An SPI clerk will shortly look at the case and endorse or decline the request.

10 April 2012
Suspected sockpuppets

Subsequent to RobvanderWaal's block yesterday per the previous investigation, this account shows up. User:RUCloseYet? showed up to the Major depressive disorder article and immediately implemented the change Rinpoche was trying to argue (under various accounts). His only previous activity occurred during the period between Skirtopodes' block and the beginning of RvdW's activity.

I know it's not exactly flawless scientific method, but I'm also always suspicious of accounts whose first edit is to create their own userpage. Could someone take a look please? Basalisk ⁄berate 08:37, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Updated on 13/4/2012. I'm adding User:LHirsig to the investigation based on behavioural evidence. As one example, see this diff in the same discussion. The writing style and arguments are identical to Skirtopodes. Basalisk ⁄berate 23:02, 12 April 2012 (UTC)

  • *Could've fooled me - in my experience with all 3 editors - Rinpoche, Skirtopedes and RobvanderWaal; I found Rob to be far more polite and reasonable; I'm surprised that he also went to complain about major depressive disorder - I was attacked by them as well for describing the painting as despair in the van Gogh article...Modernist (talk) 12:02, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Comments by other users

Accused parties may also comment/discuss in this section below. See Defending yourself against claims.

Clerk, CheckUser, and/or patrolling admin comments

Thought this had been hanging around for long enough.

LHirsig is  Confirmed as User:Skirtopodes, which makes him a sock of Rinpoche.

And I have two more  Confirmed socks of Skirtopodes,

JemimaWales (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki) (already blocked by Risker back in Feb)
LornaDooneBlackmore (talk · tag · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · spi block · block log · CA · CheckUser(log) · investigate · cuwiki)

RUCloseYet? is  Likely on checkuser and  Sounds like a duck quacking into a megaphone to me, so I think time can be called on this account.--Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:19, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

Categories:
Misplaced Pages:Sockpuppet investigations/Rinpoche: Difference between revisions Add topic