| Revision as of 23:59, 21 June 2012 editYoureallycan (talk | contribs)12,095 edits →Pending changes← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:00, 22 June 2012 edit undoYoureallycan (talk | contribs)12,095 edits →Pending changes: I have no trust in you at all - I am looking to remove your admin status asap -Next edit → | ||
| Line 104: | Line 104: | ||
| Your edit history appears to present that you have edited and failed to reply to my good faith concern - please reply - thanks - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 23:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC) | Your edit history appears to present that you have edited and failed to reply to my good faith concern - please reply - thanks - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 23:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| :Er, this has been made clear to you repeatedly now, YRC. I am not the only closer of the RfC. Four people are working on it. Four people are in the process of closing it. I cannot, no matter how much you might close your eyes and wish, kick the other three people out and go close the RfC alone. Neither I nor the community want that. I realize that because I'm the only one answering questions about it, it may be easy to assume that I am running things, or that I'm the reason this is taking a long time. This is not the case, and while I'm no happier about the delays than you are, I'm afraid you're going to have to resign yourself to seeing me edit other things while the close is in progress. ] (]) 23:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC) | :Er, this has been made clear to you repeatedly now, YRC. I am not the only closer of the RfC. Four people are working on it. Four people are in the process of closing it. I cannot, no matter how much you might close your eyes and wish, kick the other three people out and go close the RfC alone. Neither I nor the community want that. I realize that because I'm the only one answering questions about it, it may be easy to assume that I am running things, or that I'm the reason this is taking a long time. This is not the case, and while I'm no happier about the delays than you are, I'm afraid you're going to have to resign yourself to seeing me edit other things while the close is in progress. ] (]) 23:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
| ::" I'm afraid you're going to have to resign yourself to seeing me edit other things while the close is in progress. " - I am looking to remove your admin status asap - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 23:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC) | ::" I'm afraid you're going to have to resign yourself to seeing me edit other things while the close is in progress. " - I have no trust in you at all - I am looking to remove your admin status asap - <font color="purple">]</font><font color="orange">really</font><font color="red">]</font> 23:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:00, 22 June 2012
 | If you're trying to contact me, please remember:
|
The Signpost: 11 June 2012
- News and notes: Foundation finance reformers wrestle with CoI
- WikiProject report: Counter-Vandalism Unit
- Featured content: The cake is a pi
- Arbitration report: Procedural reform enacted, Rich Farmbrough blocked, three open cases
- Technology report: To support or not to support IPv6, and why knowing when this report was last updated might be getting easier
Can you help me in rectifying my edit?
I feel stupid asking you this, but since you voted after me and I am not able to rectify my error in my mobile device, can you correct the edit which seems to have removed others' opinions presumably due to edit conflict. Thanks. Suraj T 19:24, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Already done in the very next edit here so no action needed. --DBigXray 20:19, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Swamilive
WTF? The guy's a well known sock puppet with lots of history and verifying evidence, and you block him for 48 hours?
Do your homework please! He should be permanently blocked. You doubt me? Do a search on Swamilive. Look at the recent entry on WP:AIV. Etc. Pdfpdf (talk) 15:44, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Please try to rein in your temper - I'm trying to help you by blocking a disruptive user, and it's not encouraging to see someone lose their temper at me because I didn't do it the way they think I should do it. We don't block IPs permanently except in the most exceptional of circumstances. IPs aren't permanently tied to the people who use them, and there's no reason as of yet to think that in 48 hours, that IP will still belong to the person who was vandalising today. I'm not a checkuser, nor am I am expert in sockmasters, but in this case that's unlikely to matter, since all we have is an IP, not an account (which could be blocked permanently). Someone who is more familiar with socks is already looking at the situation, at my request, but I doubt they will be able to do much more than I've done. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:51, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, you are quite right, HE should be blocked permanently (which is impossible), not the IP address he happens to be using today.
- My apologies. (Grovel, grovel, grovel) Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 16:48, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Aw, don't worry about it - I know how stressful it can be to watch disruption go on and feel like no one's doing anything to stop it! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 17:30, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you! That's a very atypical[REDACTED] response, and I appreciate it. Pdfpdf (talk) 17:41, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
Reply
@DeltaQuad: Pine 17:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- You've got more messages there! We're a talkative crowd today. Pine 18:12, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- More. Yup. Pine 18:29, 18 June 2012 (UTC)
- Again. Pine 01:50, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thank you for your copyediting and tweaking on Peter Singer.
—Tom Morris (talk) 17:58, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
PooPrints
Hiya. Thanks for helping out at WP:AFC and reviewing Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/PooPrints. I'm a bit puzzled by your decline, as I thought the proposed article had good sourcing. If you have a moment, could you elaborate a bit on the decline reason, so I can improve my AFC submissions for the future. Thanks. -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 19:06, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Looks like we crossed in the mail here - I just got done leaving a better explanation on your talk page, when I realized the template I declined with didn't say what I thought it said. In short, you've got promising sources but no real article content, and my personal standard - which I think more or less matches the community's - is that the article itself needs to assert importance and tell us why this topic is encyclopedic. Sources are a necessary but not sufficient condition. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 19:10, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- ha! yes, crossed in the mail :) No worry. I left a reply on my talk. Cheers. -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 19:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hiya. I updated Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/PooPrints a bit: adding a bunch more refs, and added what might be a good quote to show importance. I still think it was ready for prime time in the previous version, but no harm in improving the draft anyways ;) -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 15:44, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good now - if you go ahead and flip the switch to re-submit it at AfC, I'll send it live. Doggie doo DNA testing...what a concept! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- switch flipped. This has to be one of the most interesting listings from WP:RA/CO I've found so far! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 16:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- And it's live. :) A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 16:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- switch flipped. This has to be one of the most interesting listings from WP:RA/CO I've found so far! -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 16:05, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Looks good now - if you go ahead and flip the switch to re-submit it at AfC, I'll send it live. Doggie doo DNA testing...what a concept! A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 15:58, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hiya. I updated Misplaced Pages talk:Articles for creation/PooPrints a bit: adding a bunch more refs, and added what might be a good quote to show importance. I still think it was ready for prime time in the previous version, but no harm in improving the draft anyways ;) -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 15:44, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
- ha! yes, crossed in the mail :) No worry. I left a reply on my talk. Cheers. -- Eclipsed (talk) (COI Declaration) 19:17, 19 June 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
- Investigative report: Is the requests for adminship process 'broken'?
- News and notes: Ground shifts while chapters dither over new Association
- Discussion report: Discussion Reports And Miscellaneous Articulations
- WikiProject report: The Punks of Misplaced Pages
- Featured content: Taken with a pinch of "salt"
- Arbitration report: Three open cases, GoodDay case closed
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
Ping
Not sure if you saw my note above about the conversation on DQ's talk page. Pine 22:01, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
GOCE July 2012 Copy Edit Drive
Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
 The Guild of Copy Editors invites you to participate in their July 2012 Backlog elimination drive, a month-long effort to reduce the size of the copy edit backlog. The drive begins on July 1 at 00:00 (UTC) and ends on July 31 at 23:59 (UTC). Our goals are to eliminate the articles tagged in April, May and June 2011 from the queue and to complete all requests placed before the end of June. Barnstars will be awarded to anyone who copy edits more than 4,000 words, and special awards will be given to the top 6 in the following categories: "Number of articles", "Number of words", "Number of articles of over 5,000 words", "Number of articles tagged in April–June 2011", and "Longest article". We hope to see you there! – Your drive coordinators: Dank, Diannaa and Stfg. To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. Newsletter delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 18:54, 21 June 2012 (UTC) |
Pending changes
Hi - whats going on you are contributing single edits as an admin but your not closing the Pending changes RFC - whats the problem now ?Youreallycan 23:30, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
Your edit history appears to present that you have edited and failed to reply to my good faith concern - please reply - thanks - Youreallycan 23:49, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- Er, this has been made clear to you repeatedly now, YRC. I am not the only closer of the RfC. Four people are working on it. Four people are in the process of closing it. I cannot, no matter how much you might close your eyes and wish, kick the other three people out and go close the RfC alone. Neither I nor the community want that. I realize that because I'm the only one answering questions about it, it may be easy to assume that I am running things, or that I'm the reason this is taking a long time. This is not the case, and while I'm no happier about the delays than you are, I'm afraid you're going to have to resign yourself to seeing me edit other things while the close is in progress. A fluffernutter is a sandwich! (talk) 23:55, 21 June 2012 (UTC)
- " I'm afraid you're going to have to resign yourself to seeing me edit other things while the close is in progress. " - I have no trust in you at all - I am looking to remove your admin status asap - Youreallycan 23:59, 21 June 2012 (UTC)