| Revision as of 03:15, 20 June 2012 editTheSoundAndTheFury (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,994 edits Remove tag← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:39, 26 June 2012 edit undoTheSoundAndTheFury (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users3,994 edits A note on getting flamed.Next edit → | ||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| I have two modes of editing: one is the general grazing, where I cruise around, fix things, nip things, join in arguments, tidy up sentences, and sometimes delete or rearrange paragraphs, sections, or even pages. The other mode is a more focused, and therefore rare, state, where I go and get some books, or pick a topic and find some online reliable sources, then go and build out, create, or rewrite pages. I do that more rarely because it is more intellectually taxing. | I have two modes of editing: one is the general grazing, where I cruise around, fix things, nip things, join in arguments, tidy up sentences, and sometimes delete or rearrange paragraphs, sections, or even pages. The other mode is a more focused, and therefore rare, state, where I go and get some books, or pick a topic and find some online reliable sources, then go and build out, create, or rewrite pages. I do that more rarely because it is more intellectually taxing. | ||
| One word of advice if you are new here: if you edit in controversial areas, and you are not intimidated by extant editors with strong views on the topic, prepare to be ]. The problem will be resolved eventually, but you may need a seriously thick skin. | |||
| ===Essays of interest=== | ===Essays of interest=== | ||
Revision as of 03:39, 26 June 2012
.jpg){kind=link}
The bat-like creature flying through a night sky declares the subject of this famous engraving: Melancolia I. That dark temperament is personified by a female figure seated in the foreground. The winged infant beside her is a 'genius' (in the ancient sense, meaning an accompanying spirit).
Melancholy has wings and from her belt hang keys and a money bag, symbolizing power and wealth. She is surrounded by measuring instruments. Above her head is a panel of 'magic' numbers (they add up to 34 in all directions). At her feet are the tools that can fashion the material world. Yet she does nothing: lost in thought, she turns away from the light.
I have two longstanding fields of interest: one is cultural theory and criticism, philosophy, and the humanities; the other is Chinese politics, religion, and history. Since becoming a Wikipedian I've also become interested in financial topics. Misplaced Pages is a complex place, especially when it comes to contentious topics where editors have strong opinions and are committed to seeing the Misplaced Pages pages on those topics represent those opinions. I used to be quite sanguine about the encyclopedia, but the issue of persistent POV-pushing coupled with aggressive and disruptive behavior is a difficult and complex one to deal with. No suggestions for a solution to that problem, though the thoughts here seem a good start. (This is mainly in reference to the Falun Gong family of articles and some articles on China, with which I have been involved.)
Misplaced Pages is interesting for another reason, I guess it is a kind of systemic bias though it is not all that serious: it is simply that some types of articles get little attention. For example, the articles on Finance, generally, are poorly sourced, often poorly written, and are not all that useful (I'm not speaking of all of them, but a goodly number). I can only guess that this reflects the biases of Wikipedians writ large, because they just don't care about that stuff so much. In other article spaces, an unsourced sentence won't be allowed for a second. On Mergers and Acquisitions, however, you get sentences like "There are some elements to think about when choosing the form of payment. When submitting an offer, the acquiring firm should consider other potential bidders and think strategically." as though this were a how-to guide! I want to build out some of those articles with good sources and make them more informative.
I have two modes of editing: one is the general grazing, where I cruise around, fix things, nip things, join in arguments, tidy up sentences, and sometimes delete or rearrange paragraphs, sections, or even pages. The other mode is a more focused, and therefore rare, state, where I go and get some books, or pick a topic and find some online reliable sources, then go and build out, create, or rewrite pages. I do that more rarely because it is more intellectually taxing.
One word of advice if you are new here: if you edit in controversial areas, and you are not intimidated by extant editors with strong views on the topic, prepare to be flamed. The problem will be resolved eventually, but you may need a seriously thick skin.
Essays of interest
- Vine, Richard. "Foucault's gay science," New Criterion, January 1992.
- Orwell, George. "Reflections on Ghandi," Partisan Review, January 1949.
Quotes
"A sense of irony is the first victim of utopian dreams." — Theodore Dalrymple
"The fact of the matter is that editors who care about Misplaced Pages lose to editors who desire only to make articles reflect their viewpoints." — user:Hipocrite