Misplaced Pages

User talk:Yahnatan: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:46, 30 April 2006 editTimothy Usher (talk | contribs)5,475 edits →Thanks← Previous edit Revision as of 03:22, 30 April 2006 edit undoChaplineRVine (talk | contribs)205 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 57: Line 57:


As you'd expressed an opinion regarding Jesus/Isa translations about a month ago, I invite you to stop by ] (formerly ]) and offer your review of my recent changes.] 02:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC) As you'd expressed an opinion regarding Jesus/Isa translations about a month ago, I invite you to stop by ] (formerly ]) and offer your review of my recent changes.] 02:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
{{User talk:ChaplineRVine/hello-alt}}

Revision as of 03:22, 30 April 2006

Welcome!

Hello, Yahnatan, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  --ZappaZ 00:27, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Hey

Hey, I noticed you edited the TWI articles. Cool. Deckiller 00:08, 11 December 2005 (UTC)

Re: Oxford Annotated Bible

Fine additions..good work. Well done. KHM03 22:47, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

Why do people take[REDACTED] so seriously? I'm not trolling or anything I just want to know. It isn't as if anyone else other than[REDACTED] editors actually treat it as a serious source of information, because it won't ever be. Over half the traffic through wikipedia's servers are people who have something to do with[REDACTED] rather than people using it as a reference tool.. what do you think about that? Essentially, my point is, if "wikipedians" left it alone, it would drop out of existence fairly quickly. Just looking for an alternative point of view.. although I expect this comment will either be expunged or I will receive a nasty reply.

The above comment was NOT vandalism - why did you remove it? Are you afraid of criticism? Are you unable to enter into a balanced debate?

Thanks for (eventually) replying. Your response is indicative of the Misplaced Pages community as a whole: Firstly if you do not like something, you remove it, and accuse whoever posted the comment of vandalism. You use emotive and strong language like "harassment". You cannot claim harassment if one comment only has been posted. Harassment implies repeated unwanted contact over a period of time. This did not happen. Responses like this are what prevent me from being able to contribute to such a project: I could not, in good conscience, put my name toward such an endeavour as this unless there were a serious rethink of the rules of conduct.

As a word of advice, feedback you have asked for is not worth asking for. The true value comes when you haven't asked. Please take this to heart before you delete it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.140.186.215 (talk • contribs)

He's said his peace, fine and dandy. He went around adding vulgarities to articles and getting pissed at me for correcting them, that's his choice. I fixed them, said my peace, and have nothing left to say. Yahnatan 23:33, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Tawkerbot2

Sorry it issued you a warning. It was running in test mode, still issuing warnings but making no edits. There was a small problem with the code around detecting redirrects. I believe it is fixed. Please let me know if you encounter any other problems. joshbuddy 00:55, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Jehovah in the New Testament page move

It appears you did a cut-and-paste page move, which is 'bad' because it stops the 'new' article from having a complete page history. This is needed for Misplaced Pages's license. I've placed a tag on it to have its history merged, but in future just use the 'move' tab, found next to 'history' at the top of the page. Thanks, Petros471 19:54, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the tip! Yahnatan 21:06, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Micronation

Hello I'm DVGalot and I was wondering if you could join my micronation. DVGalot

Calvinist confederacy

If you have a moment, please lend your thoughts to Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion/Calvinist confederacy. --Flex 01:41, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for moving my message from the user page to the talk page for User:Apostasy. Andjam 12:33, 20 April 2006 (UTC)


Jesus in Islam

Hi Yahnatan,

As you'd expressed an opinion regarding Jesus/Isa translations about a month ago, I invite you to stop by Jesus in Islam (formerly Isa) and offer your review of my recent changes.Timothy Usher 02:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)


greetings

I'm new here so I thought I'd introduce myself to some of the people here--ChaplineRVine 13:52, 22 January 2025 (UTC)

User talk:Yahnatan: Difference between revisions Add topic