Misplaced Pages

User talk:Zrdragon12: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from[REDACTED] with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:55, 24 September 2012 editTheTimesAreAChanging (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users23,391 edits Re: new section← Previous edit Revision as of 22:58, 24 September 2012 edit undoZrdragon12 (talk | contribs)824 edits Re: commentNext edit →
Line 16: Line 16:


Your edits to Vietnam war casualties are not formatted correctly, but the citations to Rummel are too screwed up for me to bother with.] (]) 22:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC) Your edits to Vietnam war casualties are not formatted correctly, but the citations to Rummel are too screwed up for me to bother with.] (]) 22:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
:The links on some of the numbers there were incorrect so I changed them earlier on and then you came and changed them back to the wrong link. I am sorting out the links in the reference/notes page now,well the ones I did earlier.There are so many numbers on that page that it is confusing and I am sure they add up differently for different sections.] (]) 22:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:58, 24 September 2012

Here for any inquires.

Zrdragon12, you are invited to the Teahouse

[REDACTED]

Hi Zrdragon12! Thanks for contributing to Misplaced Pages. Please join other people who edit Misplaced Pages at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Misplaced Pages where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Misplaced Pages and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

Visit the TeahouseThis message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 00:27, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Re

Your edits to Vietnam war casualties are not formatted correctly, but the citations to Rummel are too screwed up for me to bother with.TheTimesAreAChanging (talk) 22:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)

The links on some of the numbers there were incorrect so I changed them earlier on and then you came and changed them back to the wrong link. I am sorting out the links in the reference/notes page now,well the ones I did earlier.There are so many numbers on that page that it is confusing and I am sure they add up differently for different sections.Zrdragon12 (talk) 22:58, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
User talk:Zrdragon12: Difference between revisions Add topic