| Revision as of 13:35, 30 October 2012 editKhazar2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers191,299 edits →Copyright issue: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:05, 1 November 2012 edit undoKhazar2 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers191,299 edits →Edit warring: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
| Hey Finalyzer, I noticed you added this edit to the Pussy Riot article. While useful information, the some phrases and sentences of your addition appear to be taken verbatim from your sources, e.g. "The Cologne protesters were bustled out by cathedral officials, and have been charged with breaching the peace and disturbing a religious service." Please keep in mind that taking the exact words of a source without using quotation marks raises copyright issues; it's important that all additions (except quotations) be put into our own words. Thanks for your help with the article! -- ] (]) 13:35, 30 October 2012 (UTC) | Hey Finalyzer, I noticed you added this edit to the Pussy Riot article. While useful information, the some phrases and sentences of your addition appear to be taken verbatim from your sources, e.g. "The Cologne protesters were bustled out by cathedral officials, and have been charged with breaching the peace and disturbing a religious service." Please keep in mind that taking the exact words of a source without using quotation marks raises copyright issues; it's important that all additions (except quotations) be put into our own words. Thanks for your help with the article! -- ] (]) 13:35, 30 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| == Edit warring == | |||
| Doing this revert against editorial consensus is extremely poor form. Max, I, and the IP have all stated that it appears the other translation is the better one. Until that consensus changes, that's the one that should stay in the article. | |||
| If you still feel that we're all wrong, you could perhaps appeal to ]. But please don't revert again until you can find some other editors who agree with you. -- ] (]) 02:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 02:05, 1 November 2012
|
Sorry!
Sorry, I managed to accidentally hit roll back while checking my watch list on my phone and didn't catch it. I need to figure out a way to disable it in the mobile browser =/ a13ean (talk) 22:07, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- It's OK. Thanks for letting me know.Finalyzer (talk) 21:42, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright issue
Hey Finalyzer, I noticed you added this edit to the Pussy Riot article. While useful information, the some phrases and sentences of your addition appear to be taken verbatim from your sources, e.g. "The Cologne protesters were bustled out by cathedral officials, and have been charged with breaching the peace and disturbing a religious service." Please keep in mind that taking the exact words of a source without using quotation marks raises copyright issues; it's important that all additions (except quotations) be put into our own words. Thanks for your help with the article! -- Khazar2 (talk) 13:35, 30 October 2012 (UTC)
Edit warring
Doing this revert against editorial consensus is extremely poor form. Max, I, and the IP have all stated that it appears the other translation is the better one. Until that consensus changes, that's the one that should stay in the article.
If you still feel that we're all wrong, you could perhaps appeal to the third opinion noticeboard. But please don't revert again until you can find some other editors who agree with you. -- Khazar2 (talk) 02:05, 1 November 2012 (UTC)