| Revision as of 01:32, 12 January 2013 editFotaun (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users35,121 edits →About the RfD on Commercial break redirects.← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:10, 25 January 2013 edit undoJc37 (talk | contribs)Administrators49,166 edits noteNext edit → | ||
| Line 63: | Line 63: | ||
| |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For extraordinary contributions of content and quality to articles related to space. Congratulations! ] (]) 01:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC) | |style="vertical-align: top; border-top: 1px solid gray;" | For extraordinary contributions of content and quality to articles related to space. Congratulations! ] (]) 01:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| |} | |} | ||
| == Protecting a proposal == | |||
| *] | |||
| A proposal is not a policy page, nor an article. And indeed, it is considered disruptive to edit a proposal during an active straw poll (XFD is one example, see also some discussions concerning the recent Arbcom election as well.) | |||
| So protection in this case was merely "preventative, not punitive". | |||
| You're welcome to your opinion, but that in itself is all it is. | |||
| Incidentally, no worries, I'll just see about placing any future proposals in user space so that such nonsense will be avoided in the future. Shrugs. | |||
| Oh and incidentally, the next time you reverse a protection, you might consider dropping a note on the protector's user page. Making accusations in your edit summary without actually making any attempt to discuss would seem to be counter to ] (not to mention ]). YMMV of course. | |||
| Oh and as far as I'm concerned, while I would have been happy to discuss at the time, at this stage, don't bother. | |||
| Happy editing. - <b>]</b> 21:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:10, 25 January 2013
|
This page is archived by MiszaBot III. Please, do not archive it manually. |
 Archives |
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 10 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 7 sections are present. |
e-mail notification
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Hawkx101
Hey I want you to become my mentor. I want to mostly review articles and possibly write new scientific articles. My interests are science and math, chemistry, biology, physics, calculus, trigonometry, geometry. I read a lot of scientific articles, ex textbooks, new developing things, and also a member of a scientific organization. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hawkx101 (talk • contribs)
MediaWiki talk:Searchmenu-new-nocreate
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Nice Work
YGM
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Check your email (from meta).
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
I didn't get. Read other email + resend.
Belated Happy New Year
Hey Ruslik, I hope you had a great 2012, and that your 2013 goes just as well. ceranthor 20:52, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- and happy Russian Christmas! Serendious 21:27, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you guys! Ruslik_Zero 18:10, 7 January 2013 (UTC)
About the RfD on Commercial break redirects.
Everyone said yes to a separate article about commercial breaks, but the result was to keep all ? What kind of sense is this? JSH-alive/ 08:19, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- What do you want me to do? Write the article myself? I am not going to write anything. If you want to turn a redirect into an article you do not need my (or anyone's also) permission to do this. Ruslik_Zero 18:32, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
The Space Barnstar
|
The Space Barnstar | |
| For extraordinary contributions of content and quality to articles related to space. Congratulations! Fotaun (talk) 01:32, 12 January 2013 (UTC) |
Protecting a proposal
A proposal is not a policy page, nor an article. And indeed, it is considered disruptive to edit a proposal during an active straw poll (XFD is one example, see also some discussions concerning the recent Arbcom election as well.)
So protection in this case was merely "preventative, not punitive".
You're welcome to your opinion, but that in itself is all it is.
Incidentally, no worries, I'll just see about placing any future proposals in user space so that such nonsense will be avoided in the future. Shrugs.
Oh and incidentally, the next time you reverse a protection, you might consider dropping a note on the protector's user page. Making accusations in your edit summary without actually making any attempt to discuss would seem to be counter to WP:ADMIN (not to mention WP:CIVIL). YMMV of course.
Oh and as far as I'm concerned, while I would have been happy to discuss at the time, at this stage, don't bother.
Happy editing. - jc37 21:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC)