| Revision as of 06:25, 9 March 2013 editCSDarrow (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,671 edits →Men's Rights Dispute: redo link← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:22, 9 March 2013 edit undoCSDarrow (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users1,671 edits →Always wondered how to do this.: new sectionNext edit → | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| Yes that is fine. I am not sure what happened there, no idea how the signature got there. Ty. ] (]) 11:39, 6 March 2013 (UTC) | Yes that is fine. I am not sure what happened there, no idea how the signature got there. Ty. ] (]) 11:39, 6 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| == Always wondered how to do this. == | |||
| {{od}} | |||
| Now I know. | |||
Revision as of 21:22, 9 March 2013
Note
Just a note to remove the red link from you talk page. You have taken a name that places the bar pretty high and I am hoping that you live up to it. Einar aka Carptrash (talk) 15:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
A friendly notice
Thank you for your contributions to the encyclopedia! In case you are not already aware, an article to which you have recently contributed, Men's rights movement, is on article probation. A detailed description of the terms of article probation may be found at Talk:Men's rights movement/Article probation. Also note that the terms of some article probations extend to related articles and their associated talk pages.
The above is a templated message. Please accept it as a routine friendly notice, not as a claim that there is any problem with your edits. Thank you. Cailil 00:44, 22 September 2012 (UTC)
Men's Rights Dispute
"Men's Rights Resolution Dispute"
Just making sure
...that I was right to do this. Cheers, Reyk YO! 06:33, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Yes that is fine. I am not sure what happened there, no idea how the signature got there. Ty. CSDarrow (talk) 11:39, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Always wondered how to do this.
Now I know.