| Revision as of 17:48, 17 March 2013 editKmzayeem (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers10,660 edits →Please stop: new section← Previous edit | Revision as of 08:19, 18 March 2013 edit undoRicose (talk | contribs)446 edits →Please stopNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| Please stop making disruptive edits as you did . You are removing large amounts of contents from those articles without even consulting to anyone, you are also removing reflinks as you did , this is not how[REDACTED] works! I've asked you to discuss in the talk pages but you went on to revert my edits! If you have any concern regarding those articles, please discuss it first in the talk pages. Thanks. --] <sup> ]</sup> 17:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | Please stop making disruptive edits as you did . You are removing large amounts of contents from those articles without even consulting to anyone, you are also removing reflinks as you did , this is not how[REDACTED] works! I've asked you to discuss in the talk pages but you went on to revert my edits! If you have any concern regarding those articles, please discuss it first in the talk pages. Thanks. --] <sup> ]</sup> 17:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| :hi. . . . . i had no intention to make disruptive edits, however,[REDACTED] does not allow us to use copious amounts of non-referenced text (these can be removed at any time) and also weasel words and peacock terms. all the articles you reverted included too much of such content, but it's not allowed to use advertising type language on wikipedia. we wouldn't find things like that in an normal encyclopedia. i hope if you go back and look at my edits, then you will understand what i was trying to do. believe me, you'll get it when you read what things i deleted! since you are highly experienced in these matters, i will also be grateful if you can also give this matter some attention and help fix these articles. ] (]) 08:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 08:19, 18 March 2013
Please leave your messages here!
Nancy (musician)
Hi. I've removed the Articles for deletion tag you placed on this article, as you did not actually say why you believe the article should be deleted. If you still wish to nominate the article for deletion, please have a look at WP:AFDHOWTO and follow the instructions there, or post a request (with your reasoning) at the Articles for deletion talk page. Or, leave me a note and I'll do it for you. Whichever way works best for you. Thanks. UltraExactZZ ~ Did 19:59, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Please stop
Please stop making disruptive edits as you did here. You are removing large amounts of contents from those articles without even consulting to anyone, you are also removing reflinks as you did here, this is not how[REDACTED] works! I've asked you to discuss in the talk pages but you went on to revert my edits! If you have any concern regarding those articles, please discuss it first in the talk pages. Thanks. --Zayeem 17:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
- hi. . . . . i had no intention to make disruptive edits, however,[REDACTED] does not allow us to use copious amounts of non-referenced text (these can be removed at any time) and also weasel words and peacock terms. all the articles you reverted included too much of such content, but it's not allowed to use advertising type language on wikipedia. we wouldn't find things like that in an normal encyclopedia. i hope if you go back and look at my edits, then you will understand what i was trying to do. believe me, you'll get it when you read what things i deleted! since you are highly experienced in these matters, i will also be grateful if you can also give this matter some attention and help fix these articles. Ricose (talk) 08:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)