| Revision as of 08:19, 18 March 2013 editRicose (talk | contribs)446 edits →Please stop← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:22, 19 March 2013 edit undoKmzayeem (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers10,660 edits →Please stopNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| :hi. . . . . i had no intention to make disruptive edits, however,[REDACTED] does not allow us to use copious amounts of non-referenced text (these can be removed at any time) and also weasel words and peacock terms. all the articles you reverted included too much of such content, but it's not allowed to use advertising type language on wikipedia. we wouldn't find things like that in an normal encyclopedia. i hope if you go back and look at my edits, then you will understand what i was trying to do. believe me, you'll get it when you read what things i deleted! since you are highly experienced in these matters, i will also be grateful if you can also give this matter some attention and help fix these articles. ] (]) 08:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC) | :hi. . . . . i had no intention to make disruptive edits, however,[REDACTED] does not allow us to use copious amounts of non-referenced text (these can be removed at any time) and also weasel words and peacock terms. all the articles you reverted included too much of such content, but it's not allowed to use advertising type language on wikipedia. we wouldn't find things like that in an normal encyclopedia. i hope if you go back and look at my edits, then you will understand what i was trying to do. believe me, you'll get it when you read what things i deleted! since you are highly experienced in these matters, i will also be grateful if you can also give this matter some attention and help fix these articles. ] (]) 08:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC) | ||
| ::Hi! Sorry for the late reply. Well, appreciate your concerns regarding those articles but going with your edits, I think you are removing more contents than you should. In few cases I've seen you are removing the reflinks and putting the ''citation needed'' tag, this doesn't appear to be constructive. Besides, I'm not the only editor that you should consult with as a lot of other editors have also contributed in those articles. I would suggest to discuss your concerns in the talk pages of those articles and add the related maintenance tags in those articles. Also, don't remove the contents unless the discussions reach a consensus. Thanks. --] <sup> ]</sup> 14:22, 19 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:22, 19 March 2013
Please leave your messages here!
Nancy (musician)
Hi. I've removed the Articles for deletion tag you placed on this article, as you did not actually say why you believe the article should be deleted. If you still wish to nominate the article for deletion, please have a look at WP:AFDHOWTO and follow the instructions there, or post a request (with your reasoning) at the Articles for deletion talk page. Or, leave me a note and I'll do it for you. Whichever way works best for you. Thanks. UltraExactZZ ~ Did 19:59, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
Please stop
Please stop making disruptive edits as you did here. You are removing large amounts of contents from those articles without even consulting to anyone, you are also removing reflinks as you did here, this is not how[REDACTED] works! I've asked you to discuss in the talk pages but you went on to revert my edits! If you have any concern regarding those articles, please discuss it first in the talk pages. Thanks. --Zayeem 17:48, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
- hi. . . . . i had no intention to make disruptive edits, however,[REDACTED] does not allow us to use copious amounts of non-referenced text (these can be removed at any time) and also weasel words and peacock terms. all the articles you reverted included too much of such content, but it's not allowed to use advertising type language on wikipedia. we wouldn't find things like that in an normal encyclopedia. i hope if you go back and look at my edits, then you will understand what i was trying to do. believe me, you'll get it when you read what things i deleted! since you are highly experienced in these matters, i will also be grateful if you can also give this matter some attention and help fix these articles. Ricose (talk) 08:19, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
- Hi! Sorry for the late reply. Well, appreciate your concerns regarding those articles but going with your edits, I think you are removing more contents than you should. In few cases I've seen you are removing the reflinks and putting the citation needed tag, this doesn't appear to be constructive. Besides, I'm not the only editor that you should consult with as a lot of other editors have also contributed in those articles. I would suggest to discuss your concerns in the talk pages of those articles and add the related maintenance tags in those articles. Also, don't remove the contents unless the discussions reach a consensus. Thanks. --Zayeem 14:22, 19 March 2013 (UTC)