| Revision as of 07:08, 28 March 2013 view sourceSandstein (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators188,631 edits You have been blocked from editing for violating an arbitration decision with your edits. (TW)← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:15, 28 March 2013 view source Russavia (talk | contribs)78,741 edits →March 2013: prepare to live a life without the tools Sandstein you twitNext edit → | ||
| Line 53: | Line 53: | ||
| == March 2013 == | == March 2013 == | ||
| <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> To enforce an ] decision, and for violating your Eastern Europe topic ban recently affirmed by the Arbitration Committee, as described in the results section of the brought by you, ]you have been ''']''' from editing for '''2 weeks'''. You are welcome to ] once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and then appeal your block using the instructions there. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 07:08, 28 March 2013 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a ] "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | <div class="user-block" style="min-height: 40px"> To enforce an ] decision, and for violating your Eastern Europe topic ban recently affirmed by the Arbitration Committee, as described in the results section of the brought by you, ]you have been ''']''' from editing for '''2 weeks'''. You are welcome to ] once the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, please read the ] and then appeal your block using the instructions there. <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">]</span></small> 07:08, 28 March 2013 (UTC) <hr/><p><small>'''Reminder to administrators:''' In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a ] "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.</small></div><!-- Template:uw-aeblock --> | ||
| Get ready to go to Arbcom Sandstein. Better have all your evidence ready, I've got mine almost done. I've shown numerous people ] and their comments is that you have really shown what a power hungry twit and bully you are. You are WRONG in your decision to nullify Arbcom sanctions and decide that they don't apply any more. Might I suggest that you plan for a life on this project without the admin tools, for you have just in plain sight misused your tools, and I will be seeing to it that are stripped from you in the most public way possible. ] (]) 07:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:15, 28 March 2013
| Welcome to my talk page. Please leave me a message, alternatively you are welcome to email me. If you leave a message here for me and it requires a reply, I will reply here, so you may want to add my talk page to your watchlist. All users have my permission to remove any bot messages from my talk page at any time. |
|---|
 |
|---|
| 15 January 2025 |
|
 Archives |
|
Index 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 |
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III. |
Polandball
Would you please remove all mention of polandball from your user page. Currently, a mini edit war is in progress, with this edit being the most recent, and which restored the offensive cartoons. Possibly you overlooked my previous request on 8 March 2013 (diff; archived here), so please either remove the cartoon section, or again remove my request as an indication that you want to keep the polandball reference on your user page. Johnuniq (talk) 03:30, 17 March 2013 (UTC)
- Please do not post on my talk page again in relation to this "issue" whilst there is a topic ban in place, as it could be construed as baiting in trying to make breach my topic ban. I just hope that no-one sees this response as a breach of said topic ban; but I need to respond to it to make it clear to Johnuniq not to bring this issue to me again; I was hoping the first time I ignored it would have been enough. Russavia (talk) 09:57, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
user page protection
Sorry, I've had to protect your user page for a few days to allow the morons to find something else to do. It expires in three days; if you want to edit your user page before then, let me (or any other admin) know and we'll remove protection or make the edit for you, one of the two. --Floquenbeam (talk) 01:06, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
{{editprotect}} Whilst I appreciate that my userpage is currently the centre of attention for a few unsavoury types, I am asking that the current protection be removed and replaced with permanent protection against unregistered editors being able to edit. This will prevent the obvious IP of 2 permabanned trolls (we know who they are) from touching anything to do with my user page. Other than that, I am more than capable of editing my own userpage as required. Cheers, Russavia (talk) 18:14, 18 March 2013 (UTC)
Done - Thank you for that. Russavia (talk) 08:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the image
Russ, thanks for the image you added to Anthony Field. As the main editor of most of the articles about The Wiggles, I've had a struggle finding good, free images. Do you have to have any more, especially of the group's members? We really need an image of the new group all together. Christine (Figureskatingfan) (talk) 15:45, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
LOL I was just comming to say the same thing yes that is a wonderfull picture of anthony thank you !! Jena (talk) 19:01, 19 March 2013 (UTC)
- No problem, my pleasure. If I come across any decent photos of other Wiggles, as individuals or as a group, I will surely add them to the articles concerned. Cheers, Russavia (talk) 15:56, 20 March 2013 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/Cheetahs on the Edge (Director's Cut)
hia
hey, I was curious if you "agreed" with the idea or the post above yours? User_talk:Jimbo_Wales#Contributors_banned_over_conduct 84.106.26.81 (talk) 12:17, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
March 2013
To enforce an arbitration decision, and for violating your Eastern Europe topic ban recently affirmed by the Arbitration Committee, as described in the results section of the enforcement request brought by you,
Reminder to administrators: In March 2010, ArbCom adopted a procedure prohibiting administrators "from reversing or overturning (explicitly or in substance) any action taken by another administrator pursuant to the terms of an active arbitration remedy, and explicitly noted as being taken to enforce said remedy, except: (a) with the written authorization of the Committee, or (b) following a clear, substantial, and active consensus of uninvolved editors at a community discussion noticeboard (such as WP:AN or WP:ANI). If consensus in such discussions is hard to judge or unclear, the parties should submit a request for clarification on the proper page." Administrators who reverse an arbitration enforcement block, such as this one, without clear authorisation will be summarily desysopped.
Get ready to go to Arbcom Sandstein. Better have all your evidence ready, I've got mine almost done. I've shown numerous people User_talk:Sandstein#Please_cease_all_activities_on_the_Volunteer_Marek_AE_report and their comments is that you have really shown what a power hungry twit and bully you are. You are WRONG in your decision to nullify Arbcom sanctions and decide that they don't apply any more. Might I suggest that you plan for a life on this project without the admin tools, for you have just in plain sight misused your tools, and I will be seeing to it that are stripped from you in the most public way possible. Russavia (talk) 07:15, 28 March 2013 (UTC)